1.6 GHz SPEC CPU2006 - Rate Benchmarks
UltraSPARC T2 and T2 Plus Systems
Improved Performance Over 1.4 GHz
Reported 07/21/09
Significance of Results
Results are presented for the SPEC CPU2006 rate benchmarks run on the new 1.6 GHz Sun UltraSPARC T2 and Sun UltraSPARC T2 Plus processors based systems. The new processors were tested in the Sun CMT family of systems, including the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120, T5220, T5240, T5440 servers and the Sun Blade T6320 server module.
SPECint_rate2006
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, equipped with four 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor chips, delivered 57% and 37% better results than the best 4-chip IBM POWER6+ based systems on the SPEC CPU2006 integer throughput metrics.
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server equipped with two 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor chips, produced 68% and 48% better results than the best 2-chip IBM POWER6+ based systems on the SPEC CPU2006 integer throughput metrics.
-
The single-chip 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 processor-based Sun CMT servers produced 59% to 68% better results than the best single-chip IBM POWER6 based systems on the SPEC CPU2006 integer throughput metrics.
-
On the four-chip Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, when compared versus the 1.4 GHz version of this server, the new 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor delivered performance improvements of 25% and 20% as measured by the SPEC CPU2006 integer throughput metrics.
-
The new 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor, when put into the 2-chip Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server, delivered improvements of 20% and 17% when compared to the 1.4 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor based server, as measured by the SPEC CPU2006 integer throughput metrics.
-
On the single-chip Sun Blade T6320 server module, Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120 and T5220 servers, the new 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 processor delivered performance improvements of 13% to 17% over the 1.4 GHz version of these servers, as measured by the SPEC CPU2006 integer throughput metrics.
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, equipped with four 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor chips, delivered a SPECint_rate_base2006 score 3X the best 4-chip Itanium based system.
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, equipped with four 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processors, delivered a SPECint_rate_base2006 score of 338, a World Record score for 4-chip systems running a single operating system instance (i.e. SMP, not clustered).
SPECfp_rate2006
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, equipped with four 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor chips, delivered 35% and 22% better results than the best 4-chip IBM POWER6+ based systems on the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server, equipped with two 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor chips, produced 40% and 27% better results than the best 2-chip IBM POWER6+ based systems on the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
-
The single 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 processor based Sun CMT servers produced between 24% and 18% better results than the best single-chip IBM POWER6 based systems on the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
-
On the four chip Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, the new 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor delivered performance improvements of 20% and 17% when compared to 1.4 GHz processors in the same system, as measured by the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
-
The new 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor, when put into a Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server, delivered an improvement of 12% when compared to the 1.4 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor based server as measured by the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
-
On the single processor Sun Blade T6320 server module, Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120 and T5220 servers, the new 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 processor delivered a performance improvement over the 1.4 GHz version of these servers of between 11% and 10% as measured by the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
-
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 server, equipped with four 1.6 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor chips, delivered a peak score 3X the best 4-chip Itanium based system, and base 2.9X, on the SPEC CPU2006 floating-point throughput metrics.
Performance Landscape
SPEC CPU2006 Performance Charts - bigger is better, selected results, please see www.spec.org for complete results. All results as of 7/17/09.
In the tables below
"Base" = SPECint_rate_base2006 or SPECfp_rate_base2006
"Peak" = SPECint_rate2006 or SPECfp_rate2006
SPECint_rate2006 results - 1 chip systems
| System | Processors | Base Copies |
Performance Results | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores/ Chips |
Type | MHz | Base | Peak | |||
| Supermicro X8DAI | 4/1 | Xeon W3570 | 3200 | 8 | 127 | 136 | Best Nehalem result |
| HP ProLiant BL465c G6 | 6/1 | Opteron 2435 | 2600 | 6 | 82.1 | 104 | Best Istanbul result |
| Sun SPARC T5220 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1582 | 63 | 89.1 | 97.0 | New |
| Sun SPARC T5120 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1582 | 63 | 89.1 | 97.0 | New |
| Sun Blade T6320 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1582 | 63 | 89.2 | 96.7 | New |
| Sun Blade T6320 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1417 | 63 | 76.4 | 85.5 | |
| Sun SPARC T5120 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1417 | 63 | 76.2 | 83.9 | |
| IBM System p 570 | 2/1 | POWER6 | 4700 | 4 | 53.2 | 60.9 | Best POWER6 result |
SPECint_rate2006 - 2 chip systems
| System | Processors | Base Copies |
Performance Results | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores/ Chips |
Type | MHz | Base | Peak | |||
| Fujitsu CELSIUS R670 | 8/2 | Xeon W5580 | 3200 | 16 | 249 | 267 | Best Nehalem result |
| Sun Blade X6270 | 8/2 | Xeon X5570 | 2933 | 16 | 223 | 260 | |
| A+ Server 1021M-UR+B | 12/2 | Opteron 2439 SE | 2800 | 12 | 168 | 215 | Best Istanbul result |
| Sun SPARC T5240 | 16/2 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1582 | 127 | 171 | 183 | New |
| Sun SPARC T5240 | 16/2 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1415 | 127 | 142 | 157 | |
| IBM Power 520 | 4/2 | POWER6+ | 4700 | 8 | 101 | 124 | Best POWER6+ peak |
| IBM Power 520 | 4/2 | POWER6+ | 4700 | 8 | 102 | 122 | Best POWER6+ base |
| HP Integrity rx2660 | 4/2 | Itanium 9140M | 1666 | 4 | 58.1 | 62.8 | Best Itanium peak |
| HP Integrity BL860c | 4/2 | Itanium 9140M | 1666 | 4 | 61.0 | na | Best Itanium base |
SPECint_rate2006 - 4 chip systems
| System | Processors | Base Copies |
Performance Results | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores/ Chips |
Type | MHz | Base | Peak | |||
| SGI Altix ICE 8200EX | 16/4 | Xeon X5570 | 2933 | 32 | 466 | 499 | Best Nehalem result Note: clustered, not SMP |
| Tyan Thunder n4250QE | 24/4 | Opteron 8439 SE | 2800 | 24 | 326 | 417 | Best Istanbul result |
| Sun SPARC T5440 | 32/4 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1596 | 255 | 338 | 360 | New. World record for 4-chip SMP SPECint_rate_base2006 |
| Sun SPARC T5440 | 32/4 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1414 | 255 | 270 | 301 | |
| IBM Power 550 | 8/4 | POWER6+ | 5000 | 16 | 215 | 263 | Best POWER6 result |
| HP Integrity BL870c | 8/4 | Itanium 9150N | 1600 | 8 | 114 | na | Best Itanium result |
SPECfp_rate2006 - 1 chip systems
| System | Processors | Base Copies |
Performance Results | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores/ Chips |
Type | MHz | Base | Peak | |||
| Supermicro X8DAI | 4/1 | Xeon W3570 | 3200 | 8 | 102 | 106 | Best Nehalem result |
| HP ProLiant BL465c G6 | 6/1 | Opteron 2435 | 2600 | 6 | 65.2 | 72.2 | Best Istanbul result |
| Sun SPARC T5220 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1582 | 63 | 64.1 | 68.5 | New |
| Sun SPARC T5120 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1582 | 63 | 64.1 | 68.5 | New |
| Sun Blade T6320 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1582 | 63 | 64.1 | 68.5 | New |
| Sun Blade T6320 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1417 | 63 | 58.1 | 62.3 | |
| SPARC T5120 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1417 | 63 | 57.9 | 62.3 | |
| SPARC T5220 | 8/1 | UltraSPARC T2 | 1417 | 63 | 57.9 | 62.3 | |
| IBM System p 570 | 2/1 | POWER6 | 4700 | 4 | 51.5 | 58.0 | Best POWER6 result |
SPECfp_rate2006 - 2 chip systems
| System | Processors | Base Copies |
Performance Results | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores/ Chips |
Type | MHz | Base | Peak | |||
| ASUS TS700-E6 | 8/2 | Xeon W5580 | 3200 | 16 | 201 | 207 | Best Nehalem result |
| A+ Server 1021M-UR+B | 12/2 | Opteron 2439 SE | 2800 | 12 | 133 | 147 | Best Istanbul result |
| Sun SPARC T5240 | 16/2 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1582 | 127 | 124 | 133 | New |
| Sun SPARC T5240 | 16/2 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1415 | 127 | 111 | 119 | |
| IBM Power 520 | 4/2 | POWER6+ | 4700 | 8 | 88.7 | 105 | Best POWER6+ result |
| HP Integrity rx2660 | 4/4 | Itanium 9140M | 1666 | 4 | 54.5 | 55.8 | Best Itanium result |
SPECfp_rate2006 - 4 chip systems
| System | Processors | Base Copies |
Performance Results | Comments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cores/ Chips |
Type | MHz | Base | Peak | |||
| SGI Altix ICE 8200EX | 16/4 | Xeon X5570 | 2933 | 32 | 361 | 372 | Best Nehalem result |
| Tyan Thunder n4250QE | 24/4 | Opteron 8439 SE | 2800 | 24 | 259 | 285 | Best Istanbul result |
| Sun SPARC T5440 | 32/4 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1596 | 255 | 254 | 270 | New |
| Sun SPARC T5440 | 32/4 | UltraSPARC T2 Plus | 1414 | 255 | 212 | 230 | |
| IBM Power 550 | 8/4 | POWER6+ | 5000 | 16 | 188 | 222 | Best POWER6+ result |
| HP Integrity rx7640 | 8/4 | Itanium 2 9040 | 1600 | 8 | 87.4 | 90.8 | Best Itanium result |
Results and Configuration Summary
Test Configurations:
Sun Blade T6320
64 GB (16 x 4GB)
Solaris 10 10/08
Sun Studio 12, Sun Studio 12 Update 1, gccfss V4.2.1
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120/T5220
64 GB (16 x 4GB)
Solaris 10 10/08
Sun Studio 12, Sun Studio 12 Update 1, gccfss V4.2.1
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240
128 GB (32 x 4GB)
Solaris 10 5/09
Sun Studio 12, Sun Studio 12 Update 1, gccfss V4.2.1
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440
256 GB (64 x 4GB)
Solaris 10 5/09
Sun Studio 12 Update 1, gccfss V4.2.1
Results Summary:
| |
T6320 | T5120 | T5220 | T5240 | T5440 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECint_rate_base2006 | 89.2 | 89.1 | 89.1 | 171 | 338 |
| SPECint_rate2006 | 96.7 | 97.0 | 97.0 | 183 | 360 |
| SPECfp_rate_base2006 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 64.1 | 124 | 254 |
| SPECfp_rate2006 | 68.5 | 68.5 | 68.5 | 133 | 270 |
Benchmark Description
SPEC CPU2006 is SPEC's most popular benchmark, with over 7000 results published in the three years since it was introduced. It measures:
- "Speed" - single copy performance of chip, memory, compiler
- "Rate" - multiple copy (throughput)
The rate metrics are used for the throughput-oriented systems described on this page. These metrics include:
- SPECint_rate2006: throughput for 12 integer benchmarks derived from real applications such as perl, gcc, XML processing, and pathfinding
- SPECfp_rate2006: throughput for 17 floating point benchmarks derived from real applications, including chemistry, physics, genetics, and weather.
There are "base" variants of both the above metrics that require more conservative compilation, such as using the same flags for all benchmarks.
See here for additional information.
Key Points and Best Practices
Result on this page for the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120 server were measured on a Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220. The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5120 and Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 are electronically equivalent. A SPARC Enterprise 5120 can hold up to 4 disks, and a T5220 can hold up to 8. This system was tested with 4 disks; therefore, results on this page apply to both the T5120 and the T5220.
Know when you need throughput vs. speed. The Sun CMT systems described on this page provide massive throughput, as demonstrated by the fact that up to 255 jobs are run on the 4-chip system, 127 on 2-chip, and 63 on 1-chip. Some of the competitive chips do have a speed advantage - e.g. Nehalem and Istanbul - but none of the competitive results undertake to run the large number of jobs tested on Sun's CMT systems.
Use the latest compiler. The Sun Studio group is always working to improve the compiler. Sun Studio 12, and Sun Studio 12 Update 1, which are used in these submissions, provide updated code generation for a wide variety of SPARC and x86 implementations.
I/O still counts. Even in a CPU-intensive workload, some I/O remains. This point is explored in some detail at http://blogs.sun.com/jhenning/entry/losing_my_fear_of_zfs.
Disclosure Statement
SPEC, SPECint, SPECfp reg tm of
Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Competitive results from
www.spec.org as of 16 July 2009. Sun's new results quoted on this page have been submitted to SPEC.
Sun Blade T6320 89.2 SPECint_rate_base2006, 96.7 SPECint_rate2006,
64.1 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 68.5 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220/T5120 89.1 SPECint_rate_base2006,
97.0 SPECint_rate2006, 64.1 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 68.5 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 172 SPECint_rate_base2006, 183 SPECint_rate2006,
124 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 133 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 338 SPECint_rate_base2006, 360 SPECint_rate2006,
254 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 270 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun Blade T6320 76.4 SPECint_rate_base2006, 85.5 SPECint_rate2006,
58.1 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 62.3 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220/T5120 76.2 SPECint_rate_base2006,
83.9 SPECint_rate2006, 57.9 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 62.3 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 142 SPECint_rate_base2006, 157 SPECint_rate2006,
111 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 119 SPECfp_rate2006;
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5440 270 SPECint_rate_base2006, 301 SPECint_rate2006,
212 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 230 SPECfp_rate2006;
IBM p 570 53.2 SPECint_rate_base2006, 60.9 SPECint_rate2006,
51.5 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 58.0 SPECfp_rate2006;
IBM Power 520 102 SPECint_rate_base2006, 124 SPECint_rate2006,
88.7 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 105 SPECfp_rate2006;
IBM Power 550 215 SPECint_rate_base2006, 263 SPECint_rate2006,
188 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 222 SPECfp_rate2006;
HP Integrity BL870c 114 SPECint_rate_base2006;
HP Integrity rx7640 87.4 SPECfp_rate_base2006, 90.8 SPECfp_rate2006.

Having lost your fear of ZFS some two-odd months back is that reflected in the filesystem used in each of these new Sun results?
Also, drifting away from the results themselves since they are all rates, doesn't the emergence of auto parallelization mean this description:
'"Speed" - single thread performance of chip, memory, compiler'
needs an update?
Posted by rick jones on July 22, 2009 at 08:30 AM PDT #
Hello Rick, yes, the 255-thread version benefits from ZFS. Thanks for the edit about the definition of speed - I am fixing it to say "single-copy", not "single-thread". Good point. -john
Posted by John Henning on July 22, 2009 at 08:51 AM PDT #