Amiram Hayardeny's My China Experience

« Previous month (Jan 2007) | Main | Next month (Mar 2007) »

http://blogs.sun.com/ChinaExperience/date/20070328 Wednesday March 28, 2007

One Last Response to Comment - I Promise!

OK, I can see already that we are on to something here.  And that my "no responses to comments" attitude can be put to rest, at least for a while.  I have received another very interesting comment from Corporate Pirates (very interesting choice of alias!) which, in short, states the following: customer service is demanded by people who do not pay the check, when people are given a choice between customer service and price, the unanimously choose lower prices over good service.  Corporate Pirates gives examples from the airline industry: Southwest airlines is the example of supposedly poor service, but lower prices.  American and United are examples for the opposite.

Truth is, at first glance I thought that there was something to it.  If I was given the choice of low price or good service and quality - wouldn't I choose the price over service?  That is if I, personally, was picking up the tab.  And then I realized, I respectfully disagree.  Hear me out.

First, Southwest has excellent service AND low prices.  In fact, Southwest was on the list of 25 top ranking customer service champions ().  What makes the difference at Southwest is NOT that they have given up on customer service for lower prices.  It's because they have found ways to lower their operating costs significantly.  To give a couple of examples: they only use Boeing 737.  This choice of one type airliner lowers their maintenance costs significantly.  They fly out of secondary airports - again lowering the operating costs.  The crew is multi-tasking.  I once saw a pilot handing me my luggage, and then I realized - this is GOOD service AND low cost!  Last but not least: they hold the industry record for preparing an airplane which has just landed for takeoff.  In that, they get more flights from an airplane then any other airline in the world.  By the way, United and American are poor service AND high prices. 

Moving on.  Service is not only the frequency with which the flight attendants smile at you.  It is also how much can you trust that what you are getting is not going to harm you, or worse.  In other words, if  you are guaranteed that everything always goes well, you may choose prices over quality.  But what if something goes wrong?  If you were given the choice of price vs. quality, what would you do?  Go with the cheaper airline, with questionable airplane maintenance?  With less pilot training?  I don't think so.  What you pay for under the umbrella of "service" is much more than that: it's safety, quality, security.

Continuing on the same thought.  We were addressing airlines.  What about the rest?  Would you choose lower priced medicine?  Education?  I think not.

So while I do think that customer select their service provider based on multiple categories - price, quality, service, and more.  Indeed, service and quality are tangibles for which people are willing to pay.  So maybe we should change the bottom line: the customer must be satisfied on a variety of categories: price, quality, service to name a few.  Companies who know how to offer the best of all shall win the heart and the wallet of their potential customers.

Taking it to the business I am in.  I have been working in the enterprise storage area for many years.  Currently I work for Sun Microsystems, as a development director for the Solaris operating system.  Suppose for a second that you are the manager of a corporate data center, for a large, global, financial firm.  Suppose further, that your data center must support hundreds of thousands of transactions every minute, 24/7, coming in from every remote corner of the globe.  Suppose, that if your systems are not available for what ever reason, you suffer a loss of $20M, every hour.  Would you choose the no name, no backing, storage controller?  Or would you go with Sun?

http://blogs.sun.com/ChinaExperience/date/20070325 Sunday March 25, 2007

Competition - Response to Comment

I usually don't respond to comments, but this one certainly deserved a response.  UX-admin raised an age old question, and an excellent one too: what if there are no options?  What if there is no competition?  No choices?  Obviously, the observation is correct.  You cannot be an educated consumer if no options exist.  In fact, the very concepts of open markets and free trade are based on the fact that the markets are just that: open and free.  What UX-admin is talking about is monopoly.  In many cases, a monopoly is government owned, but not always.  Sometimes, a monopoly was successful in wiping out all smaller competitors, to be left alone and squeeze the choice-less consumers.

Indeed, the "regulator" has a critical role in the elimination of monopolies.  In many countries, a monopoly, once declared, is required to take significant steps in its own elimination - AT&T and to a certain extent Microsoft are recent examples.  Monopoly is a consumer nightmare.  The reason is simple: once there is no competition, the product or service can be sold at the highest possible price.  Competition is the best price moderation in existence.
So my not so great answer to UX-admin is that free markets are built from the bottom up.  Surely, in some aspects choices DO exist.  You can eat in a restaurant that is cheaper and serves its customers better.  You can do what I do: tell the places which you frequent that you come to them because they are either cheaper, better, higher quality.  You can tell your family and friends to go or to not go to certain places.  At the age of the Internet - you can do what I do: blog.

Of course, if you are on your own - you won't get very far.  But if there are many - it's an entirely different ballgame.  And the government, once it is open for election (absolute competition) wants the citizens to be happy.  The government regulates monopoly, and enforces competition.  It is good for everyone: the consumer and (believe it or not) the competitors.  Competition encourages innovation, quality, price.  Competition is the best form of trade.  It takes time, but since it is the only concept which supports equilibrium - it works.

So be optimistic, and patient.  It will happen, in due time.

Quarterly Visit to the USA - Impressions

My first trip to the United States was at the age of 16, in 1979.  This was also my first trip out of the Israel, where I was born and raised.  My first impression was at the airport.  For the first time in my life, someone addressed me as "Sir" and added "Mister" to my last name.  But throughout the eight week trip, I remember clearly that I was most impressed with the level of service I received.  Customer service that is.  Thirty years ago, customer service did not yet arrive in Israel.  There was no such thing as "refund" or "exchange".  If you stayed at a store over a few minutes without giving any indication of purchasing anything, it was quite likely that you would be asked to leave.  When I went to the US, I realized that there's another world out there.  A world which respected people, or rather customers, consumers, potential customers.  I was introduced to the phrase "The Customer is Always Right"...

Needless to say, I liked it.  Not only I liked it, I learned to demand it.  If I was going to pay someone, I made sure I was getting my money's worth.  Like me, hundreds of thousands of Israelis went to Europe and to the US, and overtime, they influenced the level of service in Israel by simply giving the business to competitors in case of disappointment.  Nowadays, when you enter a store, you are addressed with "Sir".  You are given the respect you deserve.  The respect you pay for.  You can return merchandise, you can exchange it.  It's a pleasure.

And guess what.  When I go to the US now, I realize that the service level is deteriorating, significantly, and consistently.  Many times I encounter service persons who are uneducated, unprofessional, sometimes simply rude.
There are exceptions, of course.  I read BusinessWeek's rating of the top twenty five customer service champions.  (Read: BusinessWeek's Customer Service Champions)  Some companies really appreciate their customers, others don't.  You will find in this article, the exceptional service given by some companies to their customers.  Needless to say, good service is associated with very successful companies.

My latest example is United Airlines.  Last week I flew back and forth from Beijing to San Francisco.  I chose United Airlines (not too many options).  I was surprised to discover that the service given by United staff was much better at the Beijing airport.  At the San Francisco airport, the service was substandard.  The flight was overbooked, and there was no way to check in on line.  I have a personal problem - I cannot sit in the middle seat, I am simply too heavy.  Therefore, I reported to the check-in counter four (4!!!) hours before departure so I can get either a window or an aisle seat.  To my great surprise and disappointment, I was told that seat assignment will be done at the gate (unless of course I was willing to pay $599.00 for an upgrade to business - to which I said: thanks but no thanks).  Now, I have been flying much longer than the check-in counter attendant has lived, and never was I told that seat assignment will be done at the gate because the flight was full.  But my protests lead me to nothing.  At the gate, I met dozens of people waiting in line to get a seat assignment.  They were all upset.  The flight was packed and crowded, not a great experience.    I encountered a similar experience at the Hertz counter.

To be fair, there was one incredible exception.  For the first time in my life, I showed up at a hotel - the Sierra Suites of Santa Clara, and there was no reservations for me.  The attendant, a young woman named Sandra, was amazingly kind, trying all she could to get me settled.  When she realized she couldn't get me a room at the Sierra Suites, she made a few phone calls and got me a room at the Holiday Inn, and even printed the directions for me.  Thanks Sandra!  The Sierra Suites will definitely get my future business.

Lastly, please bear with me, the issue of the gifts.  I have two young kids who hate it when I travel for work.  But they understand it is necessary, and gifts do help them to be more reasonable about it.  Lately, my wife and I noticed, that every time I go to the US, I come back with a load of gifts, ALL made in China.  So we agreed, that when I go away on business, she goes to the local stores, buys the gifts, and leaves them in the trunk of the car for me.  When I get back I present it to the kids, who are as happy, and for a fraction of the price.  Still, I wanted to buy them something in the US.  So what could I buy?  Clothes, shoes, games, model cars? They are all made here in China.  So what do I get?  I respect intellectual property, ownership, rights, royalties.  Therefore, I thought I'd buy original computer games proudly made in the US of A rather than buy the cheap copies sold here in Beijing.  I bought a couple of Dr. Seuss games, and a couple of Disney games for my four year old son.  I am sure they will have a good time playing with it.

Bottom line, we are paying hefty prices, we deserve, and we should demand that what we buy is of good quality, that it works, and that the people who serve us do it politely and professionally.  Good customer service is not, or at least should not be an option - it is mandatory.  If you don't get it, take your business elsewhere.

http://blogs.sun.com/ChinaExperience/date/20070320 Tuesday March 20, 2007

Flight Adventures

I hate long flights. I understand, that is not a big piece of news. I assume that everyone who travels for work dislikes the really long flights. Let me be clear, I am not talking about the 4-5 hour flights across the US, not even the 6-7 hour flights from the the US to Europe. I'm talking about the over 10 hours in the air, non-stop.

I had my share of long flights. A rough estimate would be an average at least five cross the Atlantic round trips per year for the last twenty years. Not counting domestic flights.

The reason I am suddenly writing about it, is that I have realized something during my last flight from Beijing to San Francisco. I do fine flying at night. For years I had the same ritual. I would get to the airport at 10:00 PM, take off at midnight and after about ten hours of flight, most of them sound asleep, I would land in New York where the time would be just before sunrise. Not bad. Many times I was asleep before the plane took off. Coming back, the same way. Take off around midnight and land sometime in the early afternoon. Sure, jet-lag was always present, but it was a mild version, and usually, within a day or two it was gone.

Now, living in Beijing, the option of flying at night is not there, or at least I haven't found the option yet. So I take off around noon, fly for almost 11 hours, getting no sleep whatsoever, and land at San Francisco four hours before I left Beijing – early morning. Going back – same way: take off around noon, land in Beijing on the following. No sleep again. Nasty jet-lag, the works.

And I am not mentioning the bad movies, the sad service, the narrow seats – I know, I should be on a diet, but so should at least half the other passengers, and the flight attendants too... It seems to me that the airlines, in a miserable effort to cut costs, are reducing the service to really interesting levels. I know I brought it up before, but I will again. You call the airline, and after a 15 minute tour of the automated systems, you realize that you were hung up on. They say you can check in online, only if you can get the page up. You can get a seat assignment online, but only if you have an e-ticket, and if you are really lucky.

To be honest, I tried to run the following scenario: what if a flight took off from Beijing around midnight? What time will it be when the plane lands in San Francisco? So there you have it. If you take off from Beijing around midnight, and fly for roughly eleven hours, you will get to San Francisco around eight in the evening. Is this a good deal? I think not. Supposedly you just woke up from your sleep, and it is almost time to go back to sleep. Not good. How about the way back? Take off from San Francisco at around midnight. This will land you in Beijing at around four in the morning – next day. Actually I could go for that.

But the most interesting part is always the partners you spend your flight with. What do I mean by partner? Do you have a better name for someone whom you've never seen before, who suddenly shares your bed, snores next to you (not to mention the other stuff), and tells you his life story? I guess this is what's really bad with day flights. You have to stay up, and listen to strangers blabber about their lives. Don't get me wrong, I had some great flight partners, some of whom I am still in touch with, seriously. But this one was really amazing. A 46 year old community college professor from Wyoming, who was as big as me, and wouldn't stop coughing, snoring, talking, joking in a really loud voice. 11 hours. When we landed I was beat.

And it looked so promising in the beginning. I got the aisle seat of the emergency exit row. Probably the best seat in the plane excluding the business class. And when I got there, a little old lady was sitting in the middle seat, smiling. I was happy, hoping. Two minutes later she left, and the college professor took the seat.

Sigh.

http://blogs.sun.com/ChinaExperience/date/20070316 Friday March 16, 2007

Star Trek - Thirty Something Years Later

This is how a ceremony is created.  I come home from work, the kids are still doing homework, playing, or watching something on TV.  Smell of food comes out of the kitchen.  I change, shower and check my email.  Amazingly, one hour after leaving work, there are a couple of dozen messages already...  Dinner, showers, pajamas, and then it starts.  My seven year old daughter carefully takes out the DVD pack and selects the disk we are currently watching.  Then she puts out the light, turns on the TV and the DVD, and we sit down to watch, yes, you may have guessed: Start Trek.

The story usually starts with a quote from the captain's log:  "Captain's Log, Stardate 43385.6. We are orbiting Barzan II, which is entertaining bid for control of what appears to be a stable wormhole which could provide a permanent shortcut to the distant Gamma Quadrant."  Or something similar. 

Then the story begins.  And then, we both wait for it patiently comes the familiar and dramatic: "Space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. It's continuing mission to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations to boldly go where no man has gone before."  Both my daughter and I recite this phrase every single time.  It's exciting.

I remember clearly, many years ago, must be at least thirty (my God, I can't believe I am saying this).  Star Trek was showing every Friday at 3:00 PM.  Indeed, as I am talking about Israel, Friday was a half working / school day.  Still 3:00 PM clearly was not a prime time slot.  Yet, I would try to do everything to be there on time.  To meet Captain James T. Kirk, Mr. Spok, and Bones (Dr. McCoy) and join their adventures in the great and strange universe.  Indeed, occasionally I would ask myself the obvious questions: how come all aliens speak English, why do they all look reasonable human (additional ears, and strange shaped forehead does not count)?  But there was always an interesting plot, a question, something to resolve, to assess, to understand.  There were adjustments to be made - alien worlds have different rules.  There were laws to be kept - the prime directive (*) to name one.  And imagine, the original Star Trek aired in 1966(!!!), over forty years ago.

My favorite, though, is Captain Picard.  It is over thirty years later, and I am watching this still relevant show with my kid daughter.  And she loves it.  Now, I am not sure whether she loves it because it is really interesting to her, or simply because she gets to see it with Dad.  But does it really matter?  I truly believe that reading and watching science fiction (not the ones with the green dripping aliens...) opens the mind, the horizons.  It takes you to strange new worlds, to interesting adventures, to places where no man has gone before!

(*) As the right of each sentient species to live in accordance with its normal cultural evolution is considered scared, no Star Fleet personnel may interfere with the healthy development of alien life and culture.  Such interference includes the introduction of superior knowledge, strength, or technology to a world whose society is incapable of handling such advantages wisely.  Star Fleet personnel may not violate this Prime Directive, even to save their lives and/or their ship unless they are acting to right an earlier violation or an accidental contamination of said culture.  This directive takes precedence over any and all other considerations, and carries with it the highest moral obligation.

Ah, in the meantime, my four year old son watches Tom and Jerry on the other TV.  I wish I could beam myself to the other room occasionally...

http://blogs.sun.com/ChinaExperience/date/20070307 Wednesday March 07, 2007

More Food and Global Warming

I have mentioned to a friend that my menu was significantly extended since my daughters visited in Beijing.  The reason is that one of them is (almost) strictly vegetarian.  My friend immediately suggested that I put it in my blog, so other visitors with similar restrictions will be able to enjoy it.

This conversation made me think about blogging.  I realized quite a while ago, that blogging actually changed the way I experience life.  I know it's a big statement, but I really think that.  I find myself often looking at things and considering whether this topic will make a good blog entry.  When I realize that it will, I start taking mental notes (and sometimes real notes) so I can recall it later when the time comes to write it down.  Later I look at the notes, look up some data on the web and write the entry.

I had lunch today with two colleagues.  We went to the vegetarian restaurant here in the Tsinghua Science Park.  In my opinion it is the best restaurant around.  They serve a large variety of meat looking and tasting dishes which can be easily mistaken for the real thing.  Yet they are all made of tofu, eggplant, and other vegetables.  I love it.  I can't remember what brought it on, but suddenly we started talking about global warming.  I admit that it is rather difficult to talk about global warming when the outside here in Beijing is frozen.  Yet, it is a great topic to discuss anyway.  The variety of opinions is incredible.  Starting with those who think we should all move back to the mountains and eat fruits and vegetables, to those who don't even think that the phenomenon exists.  I will not state my opinion here, but I do want to point out a book I have read a couple of years ago.  "State of Fear", was written by Michael Crichton.  He is by far my favorite author of all times.  In fact, when I travel to the US, I have a mandatory visit to Barnes and Noble.  If there's a new Michael Crichton book available - probability is 100% that I will buy it, and be sorry that there was only one...

To make a long story short, Crichton states that the science of global warming is inaccurate at best, and may be manipulated by interested parties.  Again - I will not state my opinion.  The Heartland institute, published this article, which sums up the reasons why global warming data should be very carefully considered.  (Heartland Article)

  • most of the warming in the past century occurred before 1940, before CO2 emissions could have been a major factor (p. 84);
  • temperatures fell between 1940 and 1970 even as CO2 levels increased (p. 86);
  • temperature readings from reporting stations outside the U.S. are poorly maintained and staffed and probably inaccurate; those in the U.S., which are probably more accurate, show little or no warming trend (pp. 88-89);
  • “full professors from MIT, Harvard, Columbia, Duke, Virginia, Colorado, UC Berkeley, and other prestigious schools ... the former president of the National Academy of Sciences ... will argue that global warming is at best unproven, and at worst pure fantasy" (p. 90);
  • temperature sensors on satellites report much less warming in the upper atmosphere (which the theory of global warming predicts should warm first) than is reported by temperature sensors on the ground (p. 99);
  • data from weather balloons agree with the satellites (p. 100);
  • “No one can say for sure if global warming will result in more clouds, or fewer clouds,” yet cloud cover plays a major role in global temperatures (p. 187);
  • Antarctica “as a whole is getting colder, and the ice is getting thicker” (p. 193, sources listed on p. 194);
  • The Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica has been melting for the past 6,000 years (p. 195, p. 200-201); “Greenland might lose its ice pack in the next thousand years” (p. 363);
  • The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is “a huge group of bureaucrats and scientists under the thumb of bureaucrats,” and its 1995 report was revised “after the scientists themselves had gone home” (p. 245-246);
  • James Hansen’s predictions of global warming during a Congressional committee hearing in 1988, which launched the global warming scare, were wrong by 200 percent (.35 degrees Celsius over the next 10 years versus the actual increase of .11 degrees); in 1998, Hansen said long-term predictions of climate are impossible (pp. 246-247);
  • there has been no increase in extreme weather events (.e.g., floods, tornadoes, drought) over the past century or in the past 15 years; computer models used to forecast climate change do not predict more extreme weather (p. 362, 425-426);
  • temperature readings taken by terrestrial reporting stations are rising because they are increasingly surrounded by roads and buildings which hold heat, the “urban heat island” effect (p. 368-369); methods used to control for this effect fail to reduce temperatures enough to offset it (p. 369-376);
  • changes in land use and urbanization may contribute more to changes in the average ground temperature than “global warming” caused by human emissions (p. 383, 388);
  • temperature data are suspect because they have been adjusted and manipulated by scientists who expect to find a warming trend (p. 385-386);
  • carbon dioxide has increased a mere 60 parts per million since 1957, a tiny change in the composition of the atmosphere (p. 387);
  • increased levels of CO2 act a fertilizer, promoting plant growth and contributing to the shrinking of the Sahara desert (p. 421);
  • the spread of malaria is unaffected by global warming (pp. 421-422, footnotes on 422);
  • sufficient data exist to measure changes in mass for only 79 of the 160,000 glaciers in the world (p. 423);
  • the icecap on Kilimanjaro has been melting since the 1800s, long before human emissions could have influenced the global climate, and satellites do not detect a warming trend in the region (p. 423); deforestation at the foot of the mountain is the likely explanation for the melting trend (p. 424);
  • sea levels have been rising at the rate of 10 to 20 centimeters (four to eight inches) per hundred years for the past 6,000 years (p. 424);
  • El Niños are global weather patterns unrelated to global warming and on balance tend to be beneficial by extending growing seasons and reducing the use of heating fuels (p. 426);
  • the Kyoto Protocol would reduce temperatures by only 0.04 degrees Celsius in the year 2100 (p. 478);
  • a report by scientists published in Science concludes “there is no known technology capable of reducing [global] carbon emissions ... totally new and undiscovered technology is required” (p. 479);
  • change, not stability, is the defining characteristic of the global climate, with naturally occurring events (e.g., volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis) much more likely to affect climate than anything humans do (p. 563); and
  • computer simulations are not real-world data and cannot be relied on to produce reliable forecasts (p. 566).

 Here's my extended menu.  Enjoy.  I must admit that my wife and I are particularly fond of 宫爆鸡丁 and  地三鲜!


菜单

Menu

凉拌白菜芯 Cabbage salad
宫爆鸡丁 Chicken and peanuts
家常豆腐 Home style Tofu
鸡蛋炒饭 Fried rice with eggs
地三鲜 Eggplant, pepper and potato
茶干牛柳 Beef and peppers
红薯煎鸡柳 Sweet and sour fried chicken breast and yams
蒜茸西兰花 Garlic sauteed broccoli
烧二冬 Fried sauteed mushrooms and bamboo shoots
红烧豆腐(不放肉,放蘑菇和青菜) Braised bean curd with mushroom and vegetables
地三鲜 Sauteed eggplants, potatoes and green peppers
烧茄子(不放肉) Braised eggplants
烧豆角(不放肉) Braised green bean
青炒芦荀 Fried Asparagus
南瓜 Pumpkin
松仁玉米 Pine nuts with sweet corn
拔丝红薯 Sweet Potatoes in syrup

 

 

 


Valid HTML! Valid CSS!

This is a personal weblog, I do not speak for my employer.