Friday November 24, 2006
On Movies and Leadership
I was watching "Poseidon"(2006) the other night. It is a remake of
the "The Poseidon Adventure" from 1972. I saw them both, but this
isn't the point I will be trying to make. Poseidon is the regular
disaster movie. People are having a good time, and suddenly disaster
strikes. It could be fire, a giant wave, earthquake, sharks, etc. The
plot is also rather predictable, and the end is usually good. But
these movies usually have interesting points to watch that may easily
be overlooked due to the intense action going on the screen.
Take for example leadership. There is always the person who promises
and succeeds to lead a group of people to safety. How does it happen?
How is the leader selected? Why do people follow? Unlike the movies,
in real life people don't follow a person because of his good looks.
They follow because they believe that they have a better chance if they
follow. Analyzing leadership is very tricky, particularly in light of
the following observation: "The difference between bravery and
stupidity is only the result". Yet, leaving the cynicism alone, it is
fascinating to watch the decision making process, the risks that are
taken, the acceptance of the followers. If you ever rent Poseidon, try
to look at it trying to understand the dynamics of leadership. You
will find it quite interesting, I am sure.
Another interesting aspect is to watch the transformation of human
beings at a disaster. How quickly people return to the basics. In the
film (but this is true for other films, and indeed for reality as
well), you see people dressed in suits and dress gowns, having a fancy
dinner, dancing and having a wonderful time. A few minutes later they
become a group of survivors, struggling for the basics: breathing,
having a solid piece of something to stand on.
Yet another point is the intensity and the speed of the decision making process people in
this state must go through in order to survive. A decision making
point presents itself at almost every minute in survival situations.
You have to be able to process information quickly and be able to
decide based on partial information at a rate of a decision a minute.
Failing to make the right decisions (including failing to make decisions at all) could be fatal. Obviously, correcting a non-fatal decision very quickly becomes critical.
Last but definitely not least, is the fact that only some survive. Not
because they are smarter, stronger, more adaptive. They survive
because in retrospect they were able to make more correct decisions,
and that at every decision making point in which the wrong decision
would mean death - they made the right one. It certainly helps to be
smarter and stronger and more resourceful, but it is not sufficient.
For anyone who wants to send me email directly, you can use
my.china.experience@gmail.com. I promise I will respond to nice
letters!
Posted at 01:34PM Nov 24, 2006 by Amiram Hayardeny in Personal | Comments[0]
| « December 2009 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
| Today | ||||||
Today's Page Hits: 14
| www.flickr.com |