Colm Smyth's Weblog
Gestalt Blogology
   

20041115 Monday November 15, 2004

Java and open-source - to the point

Newsforge has an exceptionally insightful article on Java and open-source, from which I will just quote the conclusion:

Businesses and developers who fret about whether or not Java is or will become open source are missing the point. The free availability and near ubiquity of Java in the enterprise software market means that the open source software being created with Java is much more interesting than the open source status of Java.

Companies basing their business on Java software must have a well defined strategy about open source. A simple "ignore" or "accept" will not do. Companies as different as Sun and BEA see business value in open source, yet engage open source in very different ways. To succeed today, you must know how to match your business' value with the value of open source.

(2004-11-15 14:26:00.0) Permalink

Oblivious, but then ignorance is bliss

Adi Oltean's blog over on MSDN points out a brief but fascinating report hosted on the the American Psychological Association about a well run study that shows that poor performers over-rate themselves, which supports the old saw "the more you know, the more you know you don't know". Well, now you know.

But it's interesting to cross-reference that with a second article on the APA site which proposes that social comparison happens subliminally, and automatically.

Personally I choose to believe the first report because the second one appears to rely on snap judgements based on looking at photographs of people who are considered to be archetypically young (e.g. a baby), intelligent (e.g. Einstein) or beautiful, or their converse. It seems to me however that the primacy effect and a purely perceptual (rather than cognitive) classification plays too strong a role for that to be an effective predictor of a participant's day-to-day self image.

(2004-11-15 13:54:20.0) Permalink

Been there, blogged that (and here's the t-shirt to prove it)
++ungood t-shirtIf your quest for geek chic should also reflect a concern for the rise of political correctness, the decline in human languages, or amazement at the continued survival of one of the C programming language's more endearingly terse features, you've got to have one of these t-shirts (now that's real literate programming).
(2004-11-15 11:30:41.0) Permalink

Just Plain English? (no, non, nein, nyet)

In contrast to my earlier post on the importance of having a common office document format for communication, the same logic doesn't apply to human or natural languages...

A recent Forbes article muses "Must not a superstate of a score of nations have a common language?". I agree that any form of rich communication requires a language in common, but that is not the same as a single common language.

Anyone who immerses themselves in another language discovers not merely a different vocabulary and grammar, but a unique medium for communicating in the mode of a people. The most compelling example I can give of this is the turns of phrase, quotes, sayings and cliches that each language possesses. The simple fact that we love to use these because of their flavour, conciseness and expressiveness demonstrates that they are important; they are also unique to each language, reflecting the history, concerns and ideas of a people.

By accidents of history, birth and travel respectively I speak English, Gaelic, French and German in that order. English happens for me to be the most used among those langages, but it is a unique joy for me to hear and speak a different language. I have had the very great pleasure also to hear and in part to understand Italian, Russian, Czech, Hungarian, and Spanish along with several dialects in their native lands. Each of these languages has a unique flair - a different pace, a sound, a fundamental emotion or world view - and because it is often heard in a certain place, it is part of the mood and atmosphere of a different land. Language is a standing carrier wave for shared events, beliefs and culture.

There are some who view foreign languages as somehow primitive or harsh or comical simply because they are alien. I will never forget how my view of the German language changed when I had the opportunity to live in Munich for 5 months (I actually lied that I could speak German just so that I could get a job there close to my girlfriend, now my wife, and I went through 3 weeks of intense immersion in the language with books and tapes so that I could start on day one with a modicum of understanding ;) - how the experience of an initially odd word like "Schmetterling" changed when it really sunk in that this word represented "butterfly" and that when said with something approaching a native accent it could even sound beautiful - how it felt when I actually dreamed in German; how astonishing to travel on a U-bahn 6 weeks after that initial learning period and actually understand the intense conversations of German teenagers or the traditional insights of a homegoing Opa and Oma commenting on youth's vigour and blindness.

As a citizen of a country (Ireland) that has all but lost it's historic language through conquest, I can only hope that this world's rainbow of languages (including Russian for example which appears to be one of several synthetic languages under threat) never succumbs to the pale monotony of a single colour, even in the limited context of business or statercraft. That would be, hmm... double-plus-ungood.

(2004-11-15 10:48:30.0) Permalink

Historic advance in communication technology

It may seem like just another baby step (the kind we are used to seeing with web services, which will eventually enable a true pan-vendor service-oriented architecture), but I believe today we are seeing something closer to a "giant step for mankind".

A report by the European Commission recommends a common XML-based rich office productivity document format, the OASIS Open Office format, which is being put forward to become an ISO standard. The significance of this can hardly be over-emphasised - client and server applications create short-lived SOAP messages to invoke web services, but people create documents.

Imagine being able to use an office application today to create a document, and in ten years to be able to use a different version of the same application (or even a completely different application) to open and modify the same document. Now imagine you (or your child or grandchild) being able to do that in 50, or even 500 years. That is exactly what a common open standard document format makes possible.Rosetta Stone - the Key to understanding ancient alphabets

There is a very nice history of communication over on inventors.about.com, however it actually omits the Rosetta stone (see picture) which enabled archaeologists to understand writings in dead scripts. In many ways, a common electronic format for all kinds of office documents is like the creation of a universal electronic script - it gives us a way to store and exchange all kinds of rich documents with the knowledge that they can be read and understood long into the future. A rich open standard for documents can also replace serviceable creaky HTML as the Internet's universal format.

As we create technologies that are capable of storing ever more information (before the end of this century, we are likely to be able to store the entire content of the Internet on a hand-held device!), a common document format gives us the assurance that the information in our documents remains accessible. Which is good news for those of you who were perhaps thinking we were going to have to save the Internet as hard copy ;)

See Simon Phipps and Erwin Tenhumberg's comments for more about what was achieved and who supported it.

(2004-11-15 09:56:47.0) Permalink


archives
links
referers