Friday November 03, 2006 |
Tagging comes to RollerYeserday, blogs.sun.com's "Roller" implementation was updated to V3.1. The roller projects page is here.... This has integrated tagging and the Xihna Editor. I had to change the editor in my settings page and this is the first article written using it. I wonder how to apply classes to the paragraphs, so dave B$ whence html was tagged by using the show html source button and inserting the class attribute by hand. The technorati tags are tags: technology roller blogging xinha tagging opensource and I have repeated them in the roller entry tag edit box. I may go back through the blog and tag every article, or at least all those I have already tagged, and I need to work out how to display my blog's tag cloud (2006-11-03 01:58:24.0) Permalink My personal planetI now have an instance of the Planet RSS feed aggregator running on my Qube under Linux 2.2 which is aggregating my Snipsnap and del.icio.us feeds, or would be if I hadn't discovered a misconfiguration that makes it difficult to blog on my snipsnap. (This seems to be a windows firewall problem!) How do I do this?
Planet requires Python(v2,2 or better). So I downloaded the most recent Python (2.4) from and tried to compile it into an install directory, this failed because my TCL library was too old, and I couldn't replace this with an up to date version; the ActiveState TCL distribution complained about my libc's age and version, and with Linux, that's that.
For more on this unfortunate state of affairs, check my personal wiki here.... Fortunately I have a friend (Chris Gerhard) who installed Python 2.x a long time ago on a Qube and I borrowed his installation directory, copied it to my system and ran a
Here's my H1 rule, which is used to implement the page banner -
h1 {
Hope this helps! tags: technology linux qube opensource planetplanet python feedaggregator (2006-07-25 15:11:10.0) Permalink Free Databases get better all the timeDave Axmark, (see also here...one of the founders of My SQL spoke next after lunch. After he stopped talking about the product he presented some interesting slides on adoption compared with other open source projects, which probably prove the centrality of database to multi-user computing. He repeated the centrality of the "Easy Install" to the design goals of MySQL. He almost said "Release Early, Release Often!", but actually argued for the "containerisation" of fault fixes, and saves them up for infrequent releases, a version of "Do one thing really well!", which he stated was a design philosophy of MySQL. "Free databases get better all the time!" Why? Good bug reports are worth more than good code. Adoption leads to quality; all code lines are distributed to all users, the licensor does not/cannot utilise price discrimination and therefore do not create marketing/pricing packages, everyone gets everything. You have access to the ultimate documentation, the source. (I'm not 100% impressed by this argument). Security is not by obscurity. He also repeated messages other Open Source companies articulate that the community reputations developed in Open Source act as great recruitment funnels, so staff are good & known, have a good fit with the culture and a passion for the product. All arguments that apply to software other than databases! tags: Technology www2006 opensource MySQL (2006-05-23 06:45:11.0) Permalink Data Centre Life CycleJennifer Schopf then presented to the workshop on Globus' adoption of open governance, one bullet is of great interest where she talked about a technology solution to managing objects in the grid life cycle. I need to follow up on this. tags: Technology www2006 opensource (2006-05-23 04:08:39.0) Permalink Open Source Workshop at www2006I opened the "Open Source Workshop : Platform for Collaboration" using SimonPhipp's slides, "The Zen of Free", the slides I used are here.... Hopefully it went OK! Open source is in the interests of the original author and second adopters and contributors. It is not about altruism, it requires licence, motivation and agreement around governance. Some open source is more open than others! The software market is evolving, to payment at the point of value. The value is no longer right to use, but chosen from the code, education, documentation, access to updates, defect resolution, warranty, indemnity, installability. The unbundling, through the development of new monetisation strategies by software companies allows transparency of costs for software consumers. Unlocking this value, places a new role on standards in order to change the scale of inter-operability and substitutability to protect the investment of both of the past and the future. tags: Technology www2006 opensource economics (2006-05-23 03:33:33.0) Permalink Open Source, Friend or FoeThe Register today, has an article, headlined "US in open source backlash" arguing that the US is a late, slow and distressed adopter of open source compared with Europe and Latin America. It reminded me of some of the speeches and conversations I had last week (See my blog here...) in Ipswich. I bumped into Simon Deighton of MySQL. When I rudely asked him how they had beaten Postgres despite the latter's technical advantage he argued that success as an OSS vendor requires three things, a community {based around the code}, ease of installation {low barriers to entry/use}, and reliable and good enough functionality. He suggested that MySQL beat Postgres through ease of installation. Having thought hard about the list, I think its a good one. I shall certainly think about it for things I look to out there. Others should too. Zaheda Bhorat of Google spoke about their commitment to Open Source and while much of their engagement is as consumers, they sponsor the summer of code and leverage the extreme programming policy of letting their developers spend one day/week doing what they want! This freedom {together with other aspects of their culture, such as the signed publication of open source, i.e. recognising authorship} they argue makes them a desirable place to work and helps them recruit the best people. I'd not heard Simon Phipps speak before and he used some of the slides he's posted on the web. He showed how open source creates value summarised by the pithy quote "it's not about altruism". Both publication and contribution is in the coder's best interests. (I'll return to this another day as it impacts on some thinking I've been doing for the last couple of years about the source of wealth and the nature of software & information). He also offers a definition of open based on readability, however, most opensource is licenced and therefore the "right to use" is constrained. Simon has written a White Paper (see here...) offering a simple classification based on how the licence constrains copyright if users change the code. The third leg of his defintion of open relates to how easy it is to become a committer and/or how the original authors control or share the code's development and future. However possibly the most interesting comment is that we're now in "Software Market 3.0" and both expect to pay for software at the point of value and expect to make transparent payments for services related to software. Critically access to the "committers" so that errors can be fixed but a whole bunch of things come with software such as updates, fixes, documentation (including the known errors list), RFC process, consultancy, education etc. Open source allows consumers to negociate these services and pay a fair price for what they require. Simon referred to it as "unbundling the software value proposition". Clever stuff. tags: "Business Economics" opensource SUNW FOSS (2006-05-04 23:35:26.0) Permalink Open Source in the UkI attended an "Open Source Day" conference at BT's Global R & D centre having arranged for Simon Phipps to speak on behalf of Sun at the event. We took a couple of laptops with Solaris "Nevada" release 35/37 and Simon Cook blogs here..., and now in my sidebar, demonstrated the use of Zones, Net Beans and Glassfish. It was great to meet so many people; who fell into two camps, those that remember Sun as an open systems company and those that have never known and repeat our competitor propaganda that we're proprietary. It was good to have the opportunity to explain what we do. Another article posted several days later than occurred and back dated.
tags: "Business Economics" opensource opensolaris glassfish FOSS (2006-04-27 23:00:00.0) Permalink Dave's Adventures in Qubeland; shells and boot configurationIsn't This works with #
chkconfig: 2345 65 35 Copy the rc file to the I have added the following (final two) lines to the opensshd script to permit
#!/bin/sh
Running An additional problem however, is that the openssh project distributes the
rc script with an incorrect directory for the shell. For Cobalt (and maybe
other) Linux(es), you'll need to substiture the first line with
cat ${opensshd_script_name} | sed -e "s?\#\!/sbin/sh?\#\!/bin/sh?g" \
We might want some version control code. The code above assumes that
if
[ `unname` -eq 'Linux' ] This will create a file called exec_shell=`which sh` and use if
[ ! -x /sbin/sh ]&& [ -x /bin/sh ] Maybe this is all too complicated, why they've selected I've copied this article to the opensshd developer list, although while I
hope they take notice of the shell issue, tags: Technology SUNW Linux services DDNS DNS (2006-01-04 00:25:28.0) Permalink Comments [1] |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||