
Tuesday April 17, 2007
[ Media ]
The Kingdom of Content
Thomas Hazlett, professor of law and economics at George Mason university, writes about how "content" has become "king":
In 1983, US cable operators paid an average of just $2 annually per
subscriber in license fees – and over $238 in 2005. In aggregate, total
payments to cable programmers from cable operators went from just $60m
in 1983 to $16bn in 2005.
The advent of cable brought forth many legal questions:
Where it all comes out is difficult to tell. In the early days of cable television, US law was a puzzle. Should cable systems be allowed
to abscond with over-the-air signals of broadcast TV stations, re-transmitting them to subscribers? Or should cable operators – then called “Community Antenna Television” (CATV) systems – give broadcast TV stations a slice of the subscription fee pie?
This question went to the US Supreme Court in 1968 and again in 1974, an era when cable TV delivered only broadcast TV signals (ESPN, CNN, Discovery, A&E and the rest were to come years later). Both times the court held that cable operators retransmitting local signals owed nothing. In extending broadcast signals they improved reception for households, like a large antenna.
Now, we have a battle between the super copy-and-distribute machine and the "copyright-protected" content. As many have argued, in the case of the Internet, the increasingly more strict protections granted through copyrights can put stringent constraints on cultural creativity.
2007-04-17 15:04:25.0 --
;
Permalink
;
Trackback.
content
economics
law
media