Peerapong Kunasirirat's weblog

Solaris ZFS Performance (compared to VxFS, Linux Ext3 and W2K NTFS)

Wednesday Jun 13, 2007

Below is the excerpt from the articles for 3 comparison of ZFS against VxFS, Linux Ext3 and NTFS.

Solaris ZFS vs VxFS

In many cases, Solaris ZFS performs better at the initial release. In
some cases Solaris ZFS does not perform as well — but in almost all cases Solaris ZFS
performs differently. These results, as well as supporting testing data described in this
document, strive to give organizations sufficient detail on the differences between
Solaris ZFS and the Veritas File System so that intelligent decisions can be made about
when each technology could or should be used. Indeed, the results presented here can
help enterprises reach performance goals, if the goals can be quantified.

Solaris ZFS vs Linux Ext3

Testing results reveal:
• Solaris ZFS outperforms the ext3 file system in tests that represent the storage and
data requests typically made by database, mail server, and Web applications.
• The various ext3 file system mount options available require making a trade-off
between data integrity and performance — creating implications for environments in
which continuous access to data is critical. Such trade-offs are not necessary in
Solaris ZFS.

 Solaris ZFS vs MS Windows Server 2003 NTFS

Solaris ZFS outperforms the Microsoft Windows Server 2003 NTFS file system by a
factor of 1.99 to 15, depending on the test.
• A 2 TB Solaris ZFS file system can be created in 17.5 seconds using two commands. In
contrast, creating a similarly sized Microsoft Windows Server 2003 NTFS file system
involves extensive command line or graphical user interface interaction and takes
nearly four hours to complete.
• Testing of multiple disk arrays was limited due to the inability to create volumes
containing more than 32 disks in the Microsoft Windows Server 2003 environment.

 Full reports

 Solaris ZFS vs Linux Ext3 :
http://blogs.sun.com/Peerapong/resource/zfs_linux.pdf

 Solaris ZFS vs VERITAS VxFS:
http://blogs.sun.com/Peerapong/resource/zfs_veritas.pdf

Solaris ZFS vs W2K NTFS: 
http://blogs.sun.com/Peerapong/resource/zfs_msft.pdf

Solaris ZFS vs Linux RAID : http://unixconsult.org/zfs_vs_lvm.html

My previous ZFS by examples : http://blogs.sun.com/Peerapong/entry/zfs_by_examples

 


 

[2] Comments
Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg
Comments:

[Trackback] Peerapong Kunasirirat points to some really interesting benchmark documents regarding the comparision between ZFS and ext3/NTFS/vxfs. I find one paragraph out of the ext3/ZFS comparision quite informative:For the conditions tested, Solaris ZFS can out...

Posted by c0t0d0s0.org on June 13, 2007 at 05:31 PM ICT #

But in the most popular workload in datacenters - OLTP with 8kB uncached (similar to Oracle on filesystems with directio) VxFS is almost three times faster then ZFS.

Posted by przemol on June 13, 2007 at 06:57 PM ICT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed