My storage team and I focus on three of the most important aspects in any industry: customers, competitors and market trends. There is insight to gain and share in this role, so here is our take on Sun and Storage - Taylor Allis
NetApp's David Hitz Declaration
I have made it a point to not comment or offer opinion on the ongoing NetApp litigation for obvious reasons - I'll leave that task up to Sun's lawyers and our Chief General Counsel.
Fortunately, the court recently unsealed a document in the ongoing litigation. So for anyone interested in details; a copy of a declaration from NetApp's co-founder and EVP, Dave Hitz, can be viewed below:
Below are some quotes taken directly from the document:
On patents being discussed that revolve around Sun ZFS and NetApp's WAFL technology:
"Sun's ZFS technology appears to be a conscious reimplementation of NetApp's innovative WAFL filesystem, as admitted by the creators of ZFS: 'The fie system that has come closest to our design principles, other than ZFS itself, is WAFL...the first commercial file system to use the copy-on-write tree of blocks approach to file system consistency.'"
On Sun open sourcing ZFS software:
"Irreparable harm to NetApp through Sun's open sourcing of ZFS:
Sun has open-sourced ZFS and thereby given away for free NetApp's patented technology to anyone that wants to download a copy. That means Sun has created infringing computer code and made it easy for software users and software companies everywhere to infringe, instead of having users compensate NetApp for its technology through normal product purchases. This is not much different from the problems caused when an entity builds a business by distributing for free infringing copies of music. In both cases, there are practical problems in any attempt to recover the infringing copies or to enforce rights against everyone that has downloaded copies of the infringing software. One difference is that adoption of ZFS requires time because it is a software program and not just a song. The next two or three years are very significant for the proliferation of ZFS and it is vital to shut down Sun's distribution promptly."
Mike Dillon updates us that Sun submitted 6 reexamination requests on the patents asserted by NetApp to the US Patent Office (PTO); asking that it reconsider whether those patents should have ever been issued. According to Mr. Dillon, the PTO has already issued a first action rejecting all the claims of one patent - no 6,857,001. Sun has also asserted 22 patents in response against NetApp's product line.
On Sun freely licensing ZFS to other companies:
"Sun is not the only company that could potentially hurt NetApp's market position. Because Sun freely licenses ZFS to other companies, it is possible that the entire competitive profile of the data storage market might change within the next 3-5 years.
REDACTED
Moreover, because ZFS is open-sourced, it lowers the barier to entry for startup companies to bring products incorporating ZFS technology to market and start competing with NetApp. Indeed, because Sun is distributing ZFS at no cost, it dramatically lowers the product development costs for any company, not just startups."
I encourage anyone to read the document in its full context. For any legal updates, be sure to bookmark Mike's Blog.
Posted at 02:11PM Jul 01, 2008 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[0]
Open Storage: Early Customers
Now let's talk about what really matters when it comes down to Open Storage - customers. Now, forgive me for repeating myself because I mentioned some of these customer testimonials in my first Open Storage blog. But it just so happens that the ones I blogged about ended up in the Open Storage Adoption White Paper. So, I'll talk about them (again), but also throw some new ones in...
Customer Blog Comments: Before I do, I want to point to a couple of blog comments. The first one was submitted to Chuck Hollis' EMC blog post Do-It-Yourself Storage. After Mr. Hollis finished criticizing Open Storage, an experienced storage and IT customer posted this comment in response to his critique:
Posted at 05:54PM Jun 26, 2008 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[1]
My Switch from PC to Mac....
Well, I'm officially blogging from my new MacBook Pro after my old Dell PC fizzled out on me....
What a difference a decade makes. I started out on Apple as a Web developer. It was my platform of choice and I never thought I'd go to a PC - I was loyal to the core. I remember the good 'ol days of making sure my Config PPP screen showed two connected smiley faces; and the days of posting docs to my websites with my Gopher or Fetch (FTP) applications. The days of Mosaic...and then Netscape (I still remember how excited I was when I first saw Netscape). But then I left Web development to join an HP distributor and it was PCs from then on...
Why the switch?
Despite the great ads; I got into multimedia and Web 2.0 for lack of a better term. Even though I'm a "business/marketing guy"; I get to re-live the good 'ol days through my blog, Wikis and Podcasts. I also develop home movies and videos. So the switch started at home - I bought a Mac for our home computer several months ago b/c of all the multimedia features it had.
I made the switch to Mac for business this week after leaving Mac over 10 years ago. I use multimedia and Web features in business more now than I ever have before. The design and innovation coming out of Mac has been incredible lately - so the geek in me had some influence as well. Also, so far, all the applications I had on my PC work well (sometimes better) on this Mac (but of course I just got it).
But a large driver was also working at Sun - while my new Mac is pretty foreign to me at this point in time; I did see something familiar in its disk utility - ZFS. It's pretty cool to see your company's enterprise-class file system on your consumer laptop. A testament to the versatility to ZFS and open software...
Posted at 12:28PM Jun 19, 2008 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[2]
What is Open Storage? White Paper
Our Open Storage announcement drummed up interest in the industry - and for good reason...
With that said - there is still a lot more to discuss about Open Storage. We will have announcements upcoming, and we will also be publishing some White Papers on the subject.
This first one is appropriately titled, What is Open Storage? And it can be downloaded here:
I'll post the CliffsNotes below. I would also like to thank Bruce Norikane, our Sr. Analyst, for his help in writing these papers - his intellect on storage infrastructures, past and present, is astounding. I'd like to also thank or intelligence manager, Chris Ilg, for his forecasting work; as well as Graham Lovell, Jason Schaffer and our army of developers/engineers for their direction and edits (and leading the way to Open Storage...)
What is Open Storage? (The short version)
Open Storage refers to open systems storage products based on industry-standard hardware and open source software. Also, in an open storage architecture, customers can select the best hardware and software components for their individual needs. By contrast, almost all modern disk arrays and NAS storage offerings are closed systems.
To see the evolution of disk architectures and benefits to Open Storage, see the blog post, "Sun is on to something"
Open Storage Versus Traditional Storage
The following chart compares vendor products, first ship dates, and storage system components. Red items are system components that are closed, proprietary, and available through a single vendor. Yellow items are built from industry-standard components yet sold as part of a closed, proprietary system. Green items are truly open components. They are industry-standard or open-source software, giving customers choice over how their systems are built.

Of significance, since 1992, storage systems have started to utilize open-source, commodity, or industry-standard technologies. FreeBSD and Linux are used in several systems from vendors such as IBM, EMC, NetApp, and HP. However, these open technologies are deployed in a closed-system approach.
Storage software is the last major storage infrastructure software to become open source, and Sun’s OpenSolaris Storage community has been leading the change.
Sun Open Storage Value Proposition
The market shift to open storage systems and Sun’s open storage approach offer four distinct advantages:
Sun Open Storage Offerings.
Posted at 01:00PM May 15, 2008 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[5]
Sun is on to something - Open Storage
I freely admit, when Sun announced its open source storage community a year go I was a skeptic. Sure, open source has its play in software and servers - but storage?
Well, after a year of watching Sun's open storage investments, industry-standard hardware used in enterprise storage and working within Sun on today's announcement - Sun Extends World's First Open Storage Platform - I think Sun is on to something...
Also read all about Sun Open Storage here....
I'll make a brief case for open storage and Sun's leadership in it here. We have also developed a series of open storage White Papers that give more detail on the below info - I'll post them here.
What is Open Storage?
Here is a simple definition: Open storage is the combination of open source software with industry-standard hardware to create enterprise-class storage systems
Open source software like Linux or OpenSolaris OS. Open source applications like MySQL database software. And Sun has been one of the first companies to break the barrier with higher-level open source storage applications which include:
Industry-standard hardware is typically available through multiple vendors and is very price-competitive. Examples include x86 servers and standard FC/SATA/SAS disk drives. One could also include LTO tape because it is an industry-standard tape technology - but I'll primarily focus on disk systems, as this is the market that will be most impacted by open storage.
In an open storage architecture, the customer selects
the best hardware and software for the job. In contrast, almost all of
today's disk arrays and NAS appliances are closed - customers are
locked into using the vendor's disk drives, controllers and proprietary
software.
The irony being that a lot of closed systems are built from open source software and industry-standard hardware - helping
vendor margins but not customer budgets
The Evolution of disk Architectures
Our brilliant disk analyst, Bruce Norikane, also points out that industry disk systems have been evolving to more open architectures over time and with each new market introduction. A similar trend has also happened in the server market. Consider the graphic below:
Early disk systems were custom, proprietary engineering projects starting with IBM's SLED (Single Large Expensive Disk) in 1956 where everything was custom. Then in the 1980's a high-volume disk market emerged thanks to PCs and servers; and in the 1990's Enterprise RAID was adopted. Enterprise RAID incorporated a custom disk controller and these new market drives. Modular storage then hit the market, consisting of a separate controller and disk enclosures that fit in a standard rack - more flexible and affordable. Most recently we have seen the RAIN (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Nodes) architecture emerge - distributed storage based on server technologies offering better scalability at a better price point. RAIN architectures are largely based on industry-standard servers, operating systems and networks. However, while RAIN systems leverage open components, they tend to be build as closed systems with locked-in components from traditional vendors.
The next logical step is open storage - industry-standard hardware and open source software that drive down storage economics and spur greater innovation. Again, this storage systems evolution is not unlike what happened in the server world - where servers were large, proprietary and expensive years ago. Smaller, industry-standard servers and open source software changed the economics in the server market - and they are doing the same thing to storage.
Why Open Storage?
Four reasons:
1. Enterprise-class storage: Systems that offer as much or more quality, reliability and data integrity as closed systems. Sounds like a stretch? Just see the InfoWorld review of Sun's x86, SATA, open source software-based archive solution. It scored perfect 10s in reliability and scalability. Let's also not forget that ZFS offers 19 9s of data integrity with predictive, self-healing features.
2. An Open Storage Software
Community: This is important if you are a developer, a company that
has developers or a company that is planning on hiring developers to
differentiate through IT. When we launched OpenSolaris Storage last
year we had only a handful of open source projects - we now have over
30. The OpenSolaris community has more than 96,000 registered
members in all. Why is this important? Customers don't have to wait on a vendor
for the features they need - they can find
new innovations in the community or develop features themselves. Innovation is not held back by vendor objectives or limited R&D budgets...
3. Breakthrough Economics: Probably the most compelling argument for open storage and why open storage is needed today. The best way to understand how open storage can impact storage economics is through an overly-simplistic diagram of a closed system:
Now consider an open storage architecture:
In a nutshell, storage applications are free from licensing costs and open to developers. Open storage users can choose the platform their IT staff is most familiar with. An industry-standard server with ZFS (which again includes RAID, data management and data integrity features) can take the place on an expensive controller. And affordable, market-priced disks can be deployed under the system - even fast and cheap JBOD if you leverage ZFS.
To see the real-world impact we compared some closed systems vs.
open systems using Ideas International pricing:

In full disclosure, these are
US list prices. We did configure every system to be as close in
capacity as possible using affordable SATA drives in most every
configuration. And finally, certain applications, features and
environments simply must run higher-end arrays today - I am not
implying that everyone throw out their closed storage and go with 100%
open. But at this economic price difference - users will be compelled
to determine which applications and which data should migrate to more
open storage - and we presume the data center mix of open vs. closed
storage will change over time.
You can also read about the open storage impact in the VTL space here...
4.
Dynamic Scalability: Lastly, the ability to dynamically and efficiently
scale to meet today's huge data demand has become business critical,
especially with emerging Web 2.0 applications. Sun sells systems that
scale from less than 10TB to greater than 100PBs. And OpenSolaris
ZFS is a 128-bit file system that provides 16 billion, billion times (yes you read that right) the capacity of 32-bit or even 64-bit file systems.
Sun Open Storage
Sun offers every component of open storage: A tried-and-tested enterprise platform in OpenSolaris, the leading HPC file system Lustre, and the open source storage applications mentioned above. Sun also offers a complete portfolio of innovative and efficient industry-standard servers and storage.
Sun has, and will announce,
storage systems built on an open storage platform as well - Sun Fire X4500 and
Sun StorageTek 5800 are Sun's first products built on a truly open storage platform.
Sun also offers open storage services and resources through its community :
Sun Open Storage Customers
More compelling than anything I can write is what our customers say about Sun and open storage:
DigiTar
DigiTar provides advanced messaging security and processing services
over the Internet. They are using the opensolaris, Solaris ZFS and Sun
Fire X4500's. Jason Williams is DigiTar's COO/CTO and highlights his
expereince with Sun open storage in his blogpost Democratizing
Storage. Even though the DigiTar team is self-described as “Linux zealots,”
OpenSolaris was
brought in because it made a superior storage
platform. Some of my favorite quotes are below:
“That’s the really amazing thing about OpenSolaris as a storage platform. It has all of the features of an expensive array and because it allows you to build reliable storage out of commodity components, you can build the storage architecture you need instead of being held hostage by the one you can afford.”
“When you’ve got rock-solid iSCSI, NFS, and I/O multipathing implementations, as well as a file system (ZFS) that loves cheap disks…and none of it requires licensing…you can suddenly do anything. Need to handle 3600 non-cached IOPs for under $60K? No problem. Have an existing array but can’t justify $10K for snapshotting? No problem. How ‘bout serving line-rate iSCSI with commodity storage and CPUs? No problemo.”
“By using X4500s, we get the same reliability and redundancy for about 85% less cost. That kind of savings means we can deploy 6.8x more storage for the same price footprint and do all sorts of cool things..."
Nexenta
Nexenta has built its NexentaOS and NexentaStor software appliance on
Sun open storage products – OpenSolaris and ZFS. This is significant,
as the Nexenta team developed an iSCSI stack that was adopted by the
Linux community. Nexenta's team choose OpenSolaris for their storage
platform to actually build a new NAS appliance.
Nexenta's NexentaStor
offering is a software-based NAS and iSCSI solution - read about it here. There is also an excellent blog on ZFS and Nexenta here.
TACC
Open Storage also has a large play in HPC - consider one of the
world's largest supercomputer built from Sun's open storage, servers and traditional storage offerings. TACC's Ranger system will be used in computational science
& technology research. Ranger runs 3,936 nodes and 62,976
processing cores; has 23TB of memory and 504TFlops at peak performance;
and uses 1.73PB of shared disk and 31.4TB of local disk. Ranger uses
Lustre file system running across 72 Sun Fire X4500
servers. For long-term data retention and archive, Ranger runs Sun
StorageTek SAM software over six metadata servers - and deploys five
Sun StorageTek SL8500 libraries with 48 StorageTek T10000 tape drives.
Ranger will scale to over 3.1PB of online storage and 200PB of
near-line storage.
From a simple NAS appliance to one of the world's largest supercomputers - open storage scales!
You can read more user case studies below:
What about Sun's other Storage offerings?
I invariably get this question when we highlight one architecture or approach. So, to be clear - Sun sells closed systems too...and we sell a lot of them. We now sell both depending on customer needs. But we see the need for open storage - and we are investing in it while other vendors are not. We are also investing in our traditional storage products - our customers deploy a mix of storage architectures depending on their needs - so Sun sells both. Lastly, you can't claim breakthrough economics without leveraging tape in your portfolio. If you want to hear about Sun's tape commitments, read about my trip down to Imation.
But as far as open storage goes, I think Sun is on to something...
---- Updates ----
Other Open Storage Blogs:
Posted at 07:19AM Apr 29, 2008 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[2]
Top 10 Storage Technology Trends

1. Open Storage Platform (aka general purpose storage, open source storage): Trend #1 is a term we coined, so it may not sound familiar. It is a combination of market trends as well as a direction Sun is taking with its newer products. The concept of a common platform is not new – several vendors have tried to build one platform that can run multiple storage applications, saving users time and money. “Open” is a relatively new concept for storage, but not for software or servers. There are generally three components that make up an Open Storage Platform:

3. Thin Provisioning: Better system utilization is the name of
the game. Most admins know that the
utilization rates on their disk systems are not where they need to be. Thin Provisioning allows admins to allocate
or provision space to specific applications, making full use of their system’s
capacity. 3PAR spearheaded open systems
Thin Provisioning and NetApp offers it as a part of Data OnTap. Sun announced Thin Provisioning on its
StorageTek 9990V system in May – meaning consumers can have the world’s fastest
enterprise array, Virtual Disk AND Thin Provisioning all on
one platform.
Pretty cool…
4. Data Deduplication
(aka De-dup, Single-instance storage): In a world where there is more data coming
into a company than can possibly be managed – data compression ratios ranging
from 10:1 to 50:1 sound pretty darn nice
(See how De-dup works here). Data
Domain, Diligent, FalconStor and other upstarts get credit for bringing this
new technology to market and larger vendors are quickly following suite. De-dup is still emerging, can have
performance issues and does not work perfectly for every application – but
economics dictate its worth consumers investigating where it can work for them.
There are two emerging de-dup architectures: “Inline” – where the de-dup magic happens in real-time, as data comes into the system, as found in Diligent's ProtecTIER appliance. Or “Post-Processing” where the magic happens as a secondary process after the backup job, as found in FalconStor’s Single Instance Repository (SIR) software. Both have their pros and cons, and deciding which approach to use depends on balancing your performance vs. complexity needs. For the record, Sun sells both….
5. Data Encryption: One need only read the horror stories of lost
tape and disk drives to see the importance of data encryption. While it has been around for a while – the
need has never been greater. Growing
storage capacity has caused another problem – one can store a lot of personnel
records on a single cartridge or drive.
In an age of identify theft, losing one storage device can put a company
out of business. The new trend is not
how to encrypt, but where to encrypt… On the host server? On an appliance in the network? In the storage device itself? Decru (since bought by NetApp) benefited from
this trend with their encryption appliance.
I once worked with a brilliant engineer whose favorite saying was “never put a product where a feature should be.” I’d say this was Sun’s philosophy when we delivered the Sun StorageTek T10000 tape drive. Put simply, Sun put an encryption chip next to the compression chip on the drive – so data is encrypted as it is fed onto the tape. Simple and affordable – no extra appliance needed. Sun also offers the StorageTek Crypto Key Management Station to centrally authorize, secure and manage encryption keys.
6. Eco Storage (aka Green Storage/IT): I freely admit that when I was first approached with “Green Storage” I was a skeptic. I would have also never guessed Al Gore would win the Nobel Peace Prize! But Eco also stands for Economics. If you save power and footprint, and the world while you are at it – who can argue with that? But the challenge for storage customers will be sorting through the vendors who make REAL Eco investments vs. the ones that just add “Eco” or “Green” to their marketing collateral. Sun’s in the “real” category, investing heavily in Eco IT. Sun’s Eco efforts can be seen here...
7. Object Archive
(aka CAS, Application Aware Archive): The dizzying array of regulations,
compliance requirements and influx of data have made the archive market one of
the fastest growing markets in IT and storage.
And customers must continually evaluate which archive approach will work best for them. The trend here is to “build a better mousetrap archive.” The challenge is this, an archive system
must:

But do keep in mind for deep archive; Sun’s StorageTek
SL8500 Tape Library is tough to beat – just one library's max raw capacity is
56 Petabytes, and data sitting on tape consumes 0 kilowatts and generates 0 CO2… (see above trend #6)
8. New Interfaces, Protocols & Configurations: There is a lot of change happening in storage systems and how they are configured. The three primary ways storage is attached is Direct Attached Storage (DAS), Storage Area Networks (SAN) and Network Attached Storage (NAS). A disk system can also be configured in a couple different ways. RAID configurations stripe data across multiple drives and impact a system’s reliability and performance. JBOD (Just a Bunch of Disks) is more affordable because it does not require a disk controller, but provides no data redundancy. New interfaces and protocols will impact each of these markets significantly.
9.
10. Storage as a Service:

Storage as a service offered over the Internet has been talked about for years – but poor performance and implementations have cooled this trend. However, Amazon has given Storage as a Service a power boost with its Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3). By leveraging Amazon’s existing e-commerce and storage infrastructure, the company is offering customers storage capacity for $0.15 per GB-Month of storage used – possibly the cheapest $/GB on the planet. And while this may have more play in the consumer market, Amazon could re-invigorate the storage as a service trend. Also keep an eye on Sun’s Internet Service offerings over Network.com...
--- Updates ---
Posted at 12:51PM Nov 30, 2007 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[6]
Lacrosse and the future of storage...
I like storage, strategy and sports - so I really liked Scott Tracy's "Telegraph" Blog. I commented on it, but will elaborate further here. He talks about Storage running on general-purpose Solaris, and shows a nice OpenSolaris Storage Platform diagram. I'll serve up my own sports analogy (and re-live the glory days while I am at it...)
I played Football and Lacrosse in high school and college (yes, I was a UPS Logger) - but I'll stick with the Lacrosse theme.
In high school my team competed in Florida's Cocoa Expo Lacrosse Tournament. We were quickly mocked by all the teams there - they represented the best of east coast lacrosse and we were from cow-town Colorado. We were at first intimidated by their "moves" - quick sticks, behind the back passes, etc. But our coach told us to stick to the basics - two hands on the stick, straight forward passes, etc.
What happened?
We won the tournament that year - first place, #1 (and went on to win State by the way). So what's the storage tie in?
There is an appliance or point-product for everything in storage today - virtualization, data movers, back up, CDP, encryption, etc. A lot of fancy stuff that can solve individual problems, but adds to the overall complexity of IT storage. I like the OpenSolaris Storage Platform approach because it sticks to the basics - data volume management, data services, file systems - open and residing at the heart of any system or solution - its OS.
That's a winning strategy...
Posted at 02:12PM Jun 19, 2007 by Taylor Allis in Storage Intelligence | Comments[0]
Today's Page Hits: 167
| « November 2009 | ||||||
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 | |||||
| Today | ||||||
I like the "Google like approach to storage" comment (and the fact that a disk + ZFS system replaced an EMC DMX and Celerra system for this particular customer!) I also had a customer post these comments to my blog - they just deployed a 2TB OpenSolaris ZFS + COMSTAR storage system for a VMWare Cluster with off the shelf components saving €2,000 in the process. Cool stuff.
Open Storage Customers: Not surprisingly, a lot of these early adopters use open source to compete in their respective businesses. You may also expect that early Open Storage adopters would come from Sun's Solaris install base - while true, many new customers do NOT come from Sun's current base. In fact, a lot are Linux users. They have chosen Sun because of...Storage. (Open Storage to be precise).
DigiTar
DigiTar provides messaging security and processing services over the Internet (antivirus, antispam, antiphishing, firewall, and archiving). DigiTar is using Open Storage to improve the performance and efficiency of their database servers. They are using Sun's X4500 storage servers and ZFS to automate database storage administration - with ZFS they have reduced the identification and fixing of database corruption by days and/or weeks. They are also an active member of Sun's OpenSolaris community and use the OpenSolaris community and SunSpectrum for tech support.
What I personally love about DigiTar's story is that they were (still are) a Linux shop. So what made them a Sun OpenSolaris customer??? Storage!
Why? Read their CEO/CTO's blog: Democratizing Storage. He basically states that OpenSolaris was brought into the company because it made for a superior storage platform. The clencher (and essence of Open Storage) for me is when he compares deploying Open Storage vs. a traditional storage architecture:
Want do do more with less? DigiTar is with Open Storage...
Nexenta
Nexenta is unique in that they are an Open Storage customer - but they are using Open Storage to build and sell storage products of their own. They bill their product as “Enterprise-class data storage for everyone!” Nexenta has built its NexentaOS and NexentaStor software appliance from OpenSolaris and ZFS; and they can deploy it over the Sun Fire X4500 as well as other HW.
Like DigiTar, Nexenta was founded by Linux gurus. In fact, the Nexenta team developed the iSCSI stack that was adopted by the Linux community. So what platform did these experts in storage and open-source software choose to build a new storage offering? OpenSolaris & ZFS - due to its advanced storage functionality and long history in enterprise environments.
So now the company offers NexentaStor - a software-based NAS and iSCSI solution with unlimited incremental backups, snapshot mirroring and the inherent virtualization, performance, thin provisioning and ease of use benefits of ZFS.
Sapotek Inc.
Sapotek Inc. is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) provider that offers online desktop services to (currently) 200,000 users worldwide. This SaaS provider had a classic Web 2.0 storage problem - how to massively scale, efficiently and affordably?
Sapotek was running Red Hat Enterprise Linux on Dell servers and had been maxing out at five concurrent threads per server. So they migrated to Sun Fire X4200 servers and the Sun Fire X4500 storage server running ZFS. They replaced four (4) Dell/EMC storage systems with one (1) Sun Fire X4500. Sapotek also used Sun's ZFS snapshot feature, and reported that it had reduced backup and recovery times by 99%! (From hours/days to minutes). Here is what their cheif tech officer, Oscar Mondragon, said about Sun Open Storage:
Above is just a sampling of early customers that have deployed components of Sun's hardware and software Open Storage portfolio. Read the Open Storage Adoption White Paper for more case studies or my previous blog post. Additionally, take a look at these customer testimonials (Some have bought commercial versions of Sun's storage offerings and some have deployed open source offerings)