Arun Gupta, Miles to go ...

GlassFish and MySQL Student Contest - 3 steps to earn $500

Are you a student and like to earn $500 ? Here are three steps:

• Download GlassFish v2 UR2 and MySQL 5.1 Community Edition
• Create a cool open-source web application using them
• Write a review and submit your URL

• NetBeans IDE allows you to create several Java EE modules like JSP, Servlets, Java Persistence Units, Enterprise Java Beans, Java Server Faces and Web services seamlessly and deploy them directly on GlassFish.
• Rails and Grails applications can be deployed on GlassFish v2 UR2 as WAR files.
• Metro is an extensible and highly performant Web services stack in GlassFish. New functionality can be easily added by creating and configuring your pipes.

Posted by Arun Gupta in General  |  Comments[2]

Rails Conf Europe 2008 - End of Tutorial Day

Sep 2, 2008 was the Tutorials Day @ Rails Conf Europe. I attended Renegade's Guide to Hacking Rails Internals (partly) and Deploying and Monitoring Ruby on Rails. The first session did exactly what it says - explained the complete internals, digging deep into the code and how to hack them to meet your needs. I thoroughly enjoyed the second tutorial as it covered the deployment in detail and somewhat monitoring.

The first part covered the common Application Server and Web/Proxy Servers used for Rails deployment. It explained the different deployment scenarios and their pros/cons. The Application Servers (along with their detailed notes) are:

• FastCGI
• Use mod_fcgi
• Proxy local and remove FastCGI instances
• Oldest way of deploying Rails
• Deprecated & Unstable (security problems in impl of Apache2, easy to get zombie processes, works for some)
• Hard to debug
• Dont' use in production
• Mongrel
• As an alternative to FastCGI
• Complete HTTP-server that can load arbitrary Ruby-servlets
• Built-in Rails support
• Utility to manage several Mongrel clusters (mongrel_cluster)
• Very robust, strict HTTP parser, easy to debug
• Defacto standard deployment with Apache 2.2 and mod_proxy_balancer
• Can be a bit difficult to setup
• Not so easy on mass/virtual hosting
• mod_rails (aka Phusion Passenger)
• Similar to mod_php
• Fairly new module of Apache 2.2
• Allows Apache to control Rails instances
• Apache starts/stop app instance depending on the app load
• Very easy to setup
• Able to run any RACK-compatible Ruby app
• Pros
• Touching a file "restart.txt" and Phusion automatically restarts all the Rails instances
• All Rails instances are local to a machine
• HTTP balancer is required to spawn across multiple machines
• Fairly new but ready for production
• Makes setup easier - on single machine
• Multiple server still require load balancer
• Suitable for mass hosting
• JRuby, GlassFish & Co
• Similar to mod_rails where multiple runtimes can run on a single machine
• WAR-based deployments
• Suitable for Java shops
• Database connection pooling

• Hide cluster backend from the user
• Load-balancer backend instances
• Recognize down hosts
• Fair scheduler
  

• Apache2
• Introduced mod_proxy_balancer
• Can speak to multiple backends and balance requests
• Can act as pure proxy or can also serve static files
• Deliver static content
• Pros
• Very old, mature, stable
• Many people know  how to work with Apache
• Integrates well with other modules (SVN, DAV, etc)
• Cons
• Can be complicated to configure
• The stock Apache is quite resource-hungry (12-15 KB, where nginx takes 3-5 KB and 20% faster serving of static files) compared to pure proxy solutions
• nginx
• Popular Russian web server with good proxy support (40% websites in Russia run nginx)
• Can load-balance multiple backends and deliver static content
• Quite popular with Mongrel as Rails backend
• Simple configuration file - http://brainspl.at/nginx.conf.txt (nginx conf file)
• Pros
• Stable, Robust, Fast
• Use fewer resources (CPU & RAM) than Apache proxy-mode & static files
• Simple configuration file
• Can directly talk to memcached - SSI
• Cons
• More documentation would be nice
• No equivalent for many Apache modules
• LightTPD
• Lightweight and Fast web server
• Balancing proxy server
• Good FastCGI support
• Used to be popular - until Mongrel came around
• Nobody is using these days in production
• Pros
• Fast & lightweight
• User fewer resources
• Simpler configuration file
• Cons
• Unstable for some people
• Slow development cycle
• More docs would be nice
• HA-Proxy (also applies to Pen and Pound)
• Reliable, High performance TCP/HTTP-level balancer (SNMP or MySQL proxying too)
• Proxying and content inspection
• No content serving, just a proxy
• Pros
• Mature, stable & fast
• TCP & HTTP Balancing
• Cons
• Few Rails examples
• Usually not needed in Rails setup

• Small site - Apache 2.2 with mod_rails
• Medium site - Apache 2.2 as front-end proxy + Mongrel or mod_rails as backend, Deliver static files with Apache.Not nginx because it does not depend on the extra power to deliver static files.
• Large Rails site - Redundant load-balancer, redundant proxy/web, Mongrel/mod_rails
• Heavy static files - Dynamic requests to Apache+mod_rails, static files nginx/lighttpd
• Java Shop - WAR fles + integrate with existing Java landscape and infrastructure

• Is it still running ?
• What are the trends ?
  

• Monit
• Process-level monitoring
• Checks PID-files, ports and perms
• Reacts by executing a script and/or alerting
• Munin
• Host level monitoring tool
• Master periodically ask nodes for local data
• Check system resources and records historical data
• Allows to recognize trends and make predictions
• Alerting support
  

• Welcome (9:00)
• Morning Keynote (9:15)
• JRuby: The Other Red Meat (10:45)
• Rails Software Metrics (11:35)
• Achieving High Throughput and Scalability with JRuby on Rails (13:40)
• Rubinius 1.0 (14:30)
• Security on Rails (15:20)

Posted by Arun Gupta in web2.0  |  Comments[6]