The Sun BabelFish Blog

Don't panic !

Thursday Jun 22, 2006

Princess Diana

Here is a picture I took of a nice sculpture my mother made of the late Princess Diana.

My new camera: Fuji FinePix F30

Nine months ago I bought a Waterproof Pentax Optio while cycling through Europe. It was really good for outdoors, being waterproof, but I was quite dissapointed about the quality of indoor pictures: The receptors were not very sensitive (very low ISO range), so a little lack of light was soon interpreted as being indoors, and when indoors there was no way to control the flash, aperture or opening speed, so one inevitably ended up with a lot of red eyes. For out door photography I was happy enough on the whole, especially as I could take pictures whilst cycling.

Sadly at some point in one of my many trips to Grenoble I either lost the camera or had it stolen. I just don't know. I never found the time to buy a new camera, never being quite sure if I had not just mislaid it. A pitty really because I could have taken some really nice photos of my telemarking experience over there.

So yesterday, after finding that I did not have all the complex documentation required to buy a cell phone, I thought that it might be time instead to buy a camera again. This time I was looking for something flexible, with good indoor capabilities, a lot more controllable and yet still light weight enough to take on cycling expedition. The sales man easily convinced me to get the Fuji FinePix F30 with an ISO range from 100 to 3200 (review. It fits in my pocket, is easy to manipulate, very controlable. So let's see how far I get with this.

Tim Berners Lee: Net Neutrality: This is serious

When Tim Berners Lee one of the few people on the web who needs no introduction (he mostly invented it) thinks something is serious, on had better watch out. See his latest Blog Entry.

His definition of Net Neutrality is simple

Freedom of connection, with any application, to any party, is the fundamental social basis of the Internet, and, now, the society based on it.
And as he says, this does not mean you should not be able to pay more for better service. Now are the mobile phone operators not clearly violating this principle with their clauses forbidding one to use P2P services on their 3G connections?

This is a debate that is not bringing small people to the table. Lawrence Lessig has been very concerned too.

More on this issue:

Why I have not had a cell phone for over three years

I keep waiting for 3G to improve, prices to become reasonable and cell phones to contain the features I am looking for. And until now I have not managed to find anything close to what I needed. I was in Paris yesterday and walked into a fnac store where the Nokia E61 immediately cought my eye. It has most things: good looks, wide keyboard, large screen, wifi, 3G, edge, umts, etc..., but as I did not have all the paperwork, I had to leave empty handed. I took the time to educate myself on it a little more. Here are some good reviews:

But the time I had to think also was time for my doubts to grow. Was a phone, even this nice, worth buying? The most important thing for me is to be able to connect my laptop from wherever I am to the network. Being able to go to a café and be able to work would be something worth paying for. So I have been thinking for over a year of buying specialised 3G PCMCIA card to do this, but now that I want to upgrade to the new apple laptops pretty soon and as they have replaced PCMCIA with ExpressCard, it does not seem like quite the right time. I would even be willing to pay the €80 a month for so called "unlimited" coverage, if it were really unlimited. But of course it is not. Here is some fine print in French:

L’accès Data mobile illimités est strictement réservé à l’utilisation d'une personne physique. Toute association de la carte avec un équipement de type routeur, à des fins de partage de l’accès Data Haut Débit Illimité entre plusieurs utilisateurs est interdite. Les usages de type streaming, voix sur IP, Peer to Peer, sont prohibés.

Which in english can be translated roughtly as

you can not allow others to share your network, and not use it for any streaming type data, voice over IP, or P2P.

So what's the point of unlimited if you have all kinds of restrictions? Especially at that price! Hey in France for €24 you can get Gigabit ADSL, television, and free telephone! I'd be paying 4 times as much, and they want to limit what I can do on the network? Is this not also a clear violation of the net neutrality principle?

Ayway the E61 can serve as a 3G modem, so it has the required functionality, and it looks good. Perhaps with a limited number of wifi hours I could get it at a reasonble price, I thought. But the price one has to pay per month is just as offputting! It costs €30 for a few hours of talk time per month and another €30 at least to get 6 hours or 150MB of download. €60 a month. Now six hours or 150MB go really quickly in my work.

All in all I'd have to pay over €60 a month for a few hours of mobile connectivity. But with my laptops I am pretty well connected anyhow. I use iChat and Adium as chat clients, irc for group conversation, e-mail, and skype for voice calls. I can roam across coutries really well with it, and don't even have to change number. I really don't really need a mobile phone that bad come to think of it. Most places have wifi or ADSL. And if I am really in a bind I can put a few € for a special connection. But that happens relatively rarely. I have done without a mobile/cellular for over three years, without trouble. Sure sometimes it could be handy to be able to call someone when away, but then again it can be quite nice to have some quiet periods. Most of the time I am too well connected.

So what are these service providers thinking by charging so much? Does anyone really need mobile that bad?

Search

Recent Entries

Navigation

Referers