BM Seer Unofficial thoughts from an anonymous Sun employee

2-chip world record SPECjbb2005 Sun Blade T6340 & Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240

Thursday Oct 23, 2008

World Record multi-JVM 2-chip performance. Nice way to end my day presenting some more performance facts...

The Sun Blade T6340 server module and Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server, each with two 1.4 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus processors, obtained the best multi-JVM 2 chip results on the SPECjbb2005 server-side Java benchmark.

A Sun Blade T6340 server equipped with two UltraSPARC T2 Plus processors at 1.4GHz, delivered a World Record 2-chip result of 388456 SPECjbb2005 bops, 24279 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM.

A Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server equipped with two UltraSPARC T2 Plus processors at 1.4GHz, delivered an outstanding 2-chip result of 384934 SPECjbb2005 bops, 24058 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM.

The Sun Blade T6340 (two 1.4 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus chips) demonstrated 11% better performance over the IBM Power 550 (four 4.2 GHz POWER6 chips) result of 350642 SPECjbb2005 bops, 87661 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM.

The Sun Blade T6340 (two 1.4 GHz UltraSPARC T2 Plus chips) demonstrated 17% better performance over the IBM x3650 result of 330605 SPECjbb2005 bops, 82651 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM which uses two 3.3 GHz Xeon chips.

The Sun Blade T6340 and Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 each used Solaris 10 10/08 and Sun JDK 1.6.0_06 Performance Release to obtain these leading results.

Benchmark Description

SPECjbb2005 (Java Business Benchmark) measures the performance of a Java implemented application tier (server-side Java). The benchmark is based on the order processing in a wholesale supplier application. The performance of the user tier and the database tier are not measured in this test. The metrics given are number of SPECjbb2005 bops (Business Operations per Second) and SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM (bops per JVM instance).

Competitive Landscape

SPECjbb2005 Performance Chart (ordered by performance, bops: SPECjbb2005 Business Operations per Second (bigger is better)

System Processors Performance
Ch,Cr,Thr GHz Type SPECjbb2005
bops
SPECjbb2005
bops/JVM
Sun Blade T6340 2,16,128 1.4 UltraSPARC T2 Plus 388456 24279
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 2,16,128 1.4 UltraSPARC T2 Plus 384934 24058
IBM Power 550 4,8,16 4.2 Dual-Core POWER6 350642 87661
IBM x3650 2,8,8 3.3 QC Xeon 330605 82651
IBM x3650 2,8,8 3.1 QC Xeon 323172 80793
Fujitsu RX200 2,8,8 3.3 QC Xeon 316728 79182
Dell M600 2,8,8 2.3 QC Xeon 314513 78628
IBM BC HS21XM 2,8,8 3.0 QC Xeon 310028 77507
Dell PE 2950 2,8,8 3.16 QC Xeon 305411 76353

Complete benchmark results may be found at the SPEC benchmark website http://www.spec.org.

Disclosure Statement:

SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results as of 10/17/2008 on spec.org. Sun Blade T6340 (2 chips, 16 cores) 388456 SPECjbb2005 bops, 24279 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM submitted for review. Sun SE T5240 (2 chips, 16 cores) 384934 SPECjbb2005 bops, 24058 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM submitted for review. IBM p550 (4 chips, 8 cores) 350642 SPECjbb2005 bops, 87661 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM IBM x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores) 330605 SPECjbb2005 bops, 82651 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM IBM x3650 (2 chips, 8 cores) 323172 SPECjbb2005 bops, 80793 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM Fujitsu RX200 (2 chips, 8 cores) 316728 SPECjbb2005 bops, 79182 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM Dell M600 (2 chips, 8 cores) 314513 SPECjbb2005 bops, 78628 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM IBM BC HS21XM (2 chips, 8 cores) 310028 SPECjbb2005 bops, 77507 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM Dell PE 2950 (2 chips, 8 cores) 305411 SPECjbb2005 bops, 76353 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM

Results Summary

T6340 Results: 388456 SPECjbb2005 bops, 24279 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM
T5240 Results: 384934 SPECjbb2005 bops, 24058 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM
Reference Date: Oct 21, 2008
Systems: Sun Blade T6340
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240
Total Number Processors: 2, 2
Processor/GHz of Server: UltraSPARC T2 Plus 1.4 GHz
Operating System: Solaris 10 10/08
JVM: Java HotSpot(TM) 32-Bit Server, Version 1.6.0_06 Performance Release

Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg
Comments:

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.