Sun X4200 $/Perf Record: Lotus Domino NotesBench R6iNotes
Friday Feb 02, 2007
Sun Fire X4200 M2 (Opteron 2220) delivers record price/performance on Lotus Domino 7.0 mail server delivered industry leading results with best price/performance for the Lotus[R] R6iNotes on Domino mail serving benchmark.
The Sun Fire X4200 M2 server, equipped with 2 AMD Opteron 2220 processors achieved best price/performance of $2.66/user among all classes of servers using the Lotus Domino 7.0 Messaging server running the HTTP based R6iNotes benchmark.
The Sun Fire X4200 M2 server has performed best as the lowest cost and higher throughput solution for Lotus Domino 7 Messaging server running HTTP based R6iNotes benchmark at 24% less price/performance than IBM X3650 Xeon 2x3.0GHz and 56% less $/user than IBM p5-550Q Power5 2x1.5GHz.
The Sun Fire X4200 M2 server has achieved 16% less $/user than HP DL380G5 Xeon 2x3.0GHz and 36% less price/performance than HP Proliant DL580 G3 Dual core Xeon 2x3.0GHz.
The Sun Fires X4200 M2 server had 6X better average response time (AvRT) than the IBM X3650 Woodcrest based system and nearly 2X better AvRT than the HP DL380G5 Woodcrest base system.
Lotus Domino 7.0 NotesBench R6iNotes Performance Chart (in increasing $/userorder)
Users = number of users supported (bigger is better)
NotesMark = the benchmark metric (bigger is better)
$/User = cost per user (smaller is better)
#Ptn = number of partitions
| System |
#CPUxType |
Cores |
GHz |
OS |
$/User |
Users |
NotesMark |
#Ptn |
Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun Fire |
2xOpteron 2220 |
2 |
2.8 |
Red Hat Enterprise Server Linux 4.0, 64-bit |
$2.66 |
17000 |
14347 |
3 |
496ms |
| HP DL380G5 |
2xXeon (Woodcrest) |
2 |
3 |
Windows Server 2003 |
$3.15 |
19000 |
15750 |
3 |
868 ms |
| IBM X3650 | 2xXeon (Woodcrest) |
2 |
3 |
SUSE9 |
$3.47 |
22000 |
18989 |
3 |
3056ms |
| Sun Fire |
1xUST1 |
8 |
1.4 |
Solaris10 |
$3.94 |
19000 |
16061 |
4 |
400 ms |
| HP Proliant |
4xXeon |
2 |
3 |
Windows Server 2003 |
$4.15 |
18500 |
15953 |
4 |
434 ms |
| Sun Fire |
1xUST1 |
8 |
1.4 |
Solaris10 |
$4.48 |
23200 |
19518 |
4 |
692 ms |
| IBM eServer 550Q |
2xPOWER5 |
4 |
1.5 |
AIX5L V5.3 |
$5.97 |
24000 |
20108 |
4 |
932 ms |
| Sun Fire V890 |
8xUSIV+ |
2 |
1.8 |
Solaris10 |
$7.19 |
40000 |
33862 |
4 |
324 ms |
Benchmark Description
The benchmark simulates active users accessing their Domino[R] R6iNotes mail files via standard Web browser. Each simulated user periodically sends, retrieves, and deletes a specified number of e-mail messages from a browser. An average user runs this script four times per hour.
The R5iNotes and R6iNotes workloads, using the Lotus Domino Mail server (R5 or R6) are both HTTP based workloads. R6iNotes is heavier with added features and larger mail files using the MIME format.
The Lotus Webmail and iNotes workloads are NOT comparable.
Disclosure Statement:
NotesBench R6iNotes Sun Fire X4200 M2, 2 sockets, 2 cores/socket@2.8GHz AMD Opteron 2220, 32GB, 3 partitions, Red Hat Enterprise Server Linux 4.0, 64-bit, Lotus[R] Domino 7.0, 17000 users, $2.66per user, 14347 NotesMark tpm, 496ms avg rt. , IBM eServer 550Q, 8x1.5GHz POWER5, 32GB, 4 partitions, AIX 5L V5.3, Lotus Domino 7.0, 24000 users, $5.97 per user, 20108 NotesMark tpm, 932 ms avg rt., HP DL380G5, 2x3.0GHz, Intel Xeon 5160, 6GB, 3 partitions, Windows Server 2003, Lotus[R] Domino 7.0.1, 19000 users, $3.15 per user, 15750 NotesMark tpm, 868ms avg rt., IBM X3650, 2x3.0GHz, Intel Xeon, 32GB, 3 partitions, SUSE9, Lotus[R] Domino 7.0.1, 22000 users, $3.47 per user, 18989 NotesMark tpm, 3056ms avg rt., HP Proliant DL580G3, 4x3.0GHz, Intel Xeon, 8GB, 4 partitions, Windows Server 2003, Lotus[R] Domino 7.0, 18500 users, $4.15 per user, 15953 NotesMark tpm, 434ms avg rt., More info: www.notesbench.org
Results Summary
|
Audited Results |
|||
|
|
Users: |
|
17000 |
|
|
NotesMark: |
|
14347 |
|
|
Price Performance: |
|
$2.66 $/User |
|
|
Price Performance: |
|
$3.15 $/NotesMark |
|
|
Response: |
|
496 ms |
|
System: |
|
Sun Fire X4200 M2, 32GB, 2x73GB disks |
|
|
Number Processors: |
|
2 sockets, 2 cores/socket |
|
|
Processor MHz: |
|
2.8 GHz |
|
|
Storage: |
|
2 x StorageTek 3320 SCSI JBOD(12x146GB,15Krpm) Storage Arrays |
|
|
Notes Version: |
|
Lotus Domino 7.0 |
|
|
|
#Domino Partition |
|
3 |
|
Operating System: |
|
Red Hat Enterprise Server Linux 4.0, 64-bit |
|
|
Cost: |
|
$45,239.42 |
|
|
Other Performance Metrics |
|||
|
|
Users/CPU: |
|
8500 |
|
|
Users/Core |
|
4250 |











Posted by przemol on February 03, 2007 at 11:54 PM PST #
Sun also has lots of results that show Solaris is faster than Linux and we have more of those coming.
Posted by BM Seer on February 05, 2007 at 10:28 AM PST #