BM Seer Unofficial thoughts from an anonymous Sun employee

Performance of the new Sun UltraSPARC T2

Tuesday Aug 07, 2007

Sun UltraSPARC T2 is an amazing chip and very fast! The UltraSPARC T2 features several industry firsts:

  • Eight cores and 64 threads
  • Integrated 10 GbE networking and I/O
  • Dedicated, cryptographic and floating point units per core
  • 10 cryptographic functions supported with hardware
  • open-source design: www.opensparc.net

Based upon preliminary runs, the Sun UltraSPARC T2 processor at 1.4 GHz, beat all single chip scores showing 78.3 est. SPECint_rate2006. How do these preliminary runs (we must use the term "estimated" by SPEC rules) compare to SPECint_rate2006 results.

  • These Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz processor scores beat the best single-chip IBM POWER6 4.7GHz processor published result by 29%.
  • These Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz processor scores beat the best single-chip estimated scores of the AMD Barcelona by 23%.
  • These Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz processor scores beat the best single-chip published scores of the 2.66GHz Intel X5355 (Clovertown) by 48%.
Based upon preliminary runs, the Sun UltraSPARC T2 processor at 1.4 GHz, beat all single chip scores showing 62.3 est. SPECfp_rate2006. How do these preliminary runs (we must use the term "estimated" by SPEC rules) compare to SPECfp_rate2006 results.
  • These Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz processor scores beat the best published single-chip IBM POWER6 4.7GHz processor result by 7%.
  • These Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz processor scores beat the best single-chip estimated scores of the AMD Barcelona by 11%.
  • These Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz processor scores beat the best single-chip published scores of the 2.66GHz Intel X5355 (Clovertown) by 66%.

Performance per core doesn't matter GHz doesn't matter, what matters is numbers of cores, efficiency, and design of the chip! Competitors are saying that UltraSPARC T2 is proprietary... this makes no sense. both UltraSPARC T1 and UltraSPARC T2 are open source designs (www.opensparc.net). You do not find the latest design of Intel, AMD, or IBM as open source designs.

Disclosure Statement:

All Sun UltraSPARC T2 SPEC CPU metrics quoted are from full “reportable” runs, but are nevertheless designated as “estimates” because they use preproduction systems. SPEC, SPECint, SPECfp registered trademarks of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4GHz (1 chip, 8 cores, 64 threads) 78.3 est. SPECint_rate2006, 62.3 est. SPECfp_rate2006. Competitive results from www.spec.org as of August 6, 2007. IBM POWER6 4.7GHz (1 chip, 2 cores, 4 threads) 60.9. SPECint_rate2006, 58.0 SPECfp_rate2006. AMD Barcelona 2.6 GHz (1 chip, 4 cores, 4 threads) 63.9 est SPECint_rate2006, 56.3 est. SPECfp_rate2006. Barcelona estimates based upon "The Register" article stating 2.6GHz quad is 21% and 50% faster than Intel 2.66 system. Fujitsu RX300 Intel X5355 2.66 GHz (1 chip, 4 cores, 4 threads) 52.8 SPECint_rate2006, 47.5 SPECfp_rate2006.

Reminder: The Niagara 2 score was obtained from a full "reportable" SPEC run, but is designated as an "estimate" because a pre-production system was used.

...more information on the UltraSPARC T2 later today.

[6] Comments
Comments:

[Trackback] BMseer compares the preliminary SPECint_rate2006 and SPECfp_rate2006 results of Niagara2 with some other leading processor brands ... very encouraging.

Posted by c0t0d0s0.org on August 07, 2007 at 10:23 AM PDT #

%s/T1/T2/g needed...

Posted by Paul Murphy on August 07, 2007 at 10:50 AM PDT #

You need to proofread! A whole section is duplicated, and as Paul said T1/T2 needs fixing. Also, the link to <a href="http://www.opensparc.net">www.opensparc.net</a> is broken.

Posted by 76.199.196.198 on August 07, 2007 at 11:39 AM PDT #

whoops, busy day and I got sloppy... typos fixed.

Posted by BM Seer on August 07, 2007 at 12:03 PM PDT #

Now if you Sun liars would stop pretending you're open, or actually OPEN UP that would be great. Until you provide docs for your hardware, you are not open. Where's the schizo docs, still, after 3 years of requests? Why does the open source community have to resorty to reverse engineering to support your chipsets if you are so open?

Posted by Joe on August 07, 2007 at 06:28 PM PDT #

Cool eco-fact in the top right. You should also check out this one.
http://www.pge.com/news/news_releases/q2_2007/070510.html
Also when is Sun going to stop forcing customers to buy 32MB of memory on T2000's? You are killing the environment.

Posted by Shamus on August 09, 2007 at 08:56 PM PDT #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.