BM Seer Unofficial thoughts from an anonymous Sun employee

Woodcrest memory lacks an important power-saving feature

Thursday Dec 07, 2006

There are technical reasons why a 32GB 2-processor Woodcrest server draws a hefty 510 watts. Intel decided not to implement the energy saving "page open mode" for the power-hungry FB-DIMMs. So CPU power throttling may have limited benefit on Woodcrest systems.

System 8GB 10GB 16GB 32GB
Woodcrest 330 watts 2-socket 400 watts 1-socket 430 watts 2-socket 510 watts 2-socket
Disk Config 1x150GB 7200 rpm SATA disk disk one 73GB 15K rpm SAS (disk idle) just 2 SATA HDDs
Sources: Intel disclosed intel whitepaper Sun measured www.c0t0d0s0.org posting

Intel has shown that a 10GB 1 socket Woodcrest draws 400 watts, but you have to dig past some marketing spin to find it, see page 3 of www.intel.com/it/pdf/energy-efficient-perf-for-the-data-center.pdf.

Sun publishes benchmark performance and watts on Sun Fire T2000(~330 watts) and the Sun Fire T1000(~185 watts), performance, and configuration on all of its benchmarks http://www.sun.com/servers/coolthreads/t1000/benchmarks.jsp.

  • 330 watts 32GB Sun Fire T2000
    • 32GB; 4 x 73GB 10K rpm SAS disks, 3 Northstar NICs, Crystal FCAL
    • 32GB T2000 has 100 less watts and twice the memory of the 16GB Woodcrest config
    • measured by Sun, CPUs busy, network busy, disks idle
  • 185 watts 16GB Sun Fire T1000
    • Measured on every T2000/T1000 benchmark

Woodcrest 16GB 430 watt measured config details:

    Dell 2950
    2 x 3GHz Woodcrest Xeon 5160 (4MB L2 cache)
    16GB = 8 x 2GB DIMM;
    one 73GB 15K rpm SAS (disk idle)
    1.333MHz FSB
    PERC 5/i, x6 Backplane Integrated Controller Card
    QLogic 2462 Dual Channel 4GB Optical FC HBA PCI-E
    OS: SuSE - SLES
    all bios settings correct

Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg
Comments:

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.