BM Seer Facts & Questions from an Anonymous Sun Source

Record SPECapc Unigraphics UGS-NX3 MCAD Benchmark Sun Ultra 40 M2

Thursday Jun 21, 2007

Record SPECapc Unigraphics UGS-NX3 MCAD Benchmark Sun Ultra 40 M2

The Sun Ultra 40 M2 (dual nVidia Quadro FX 5600s SLI mode & 3.0 GHz dual-core Opteron 2222 SE) sets a new world record running the SPEC APC UGS-NX3 graphics oriented MCAD benchmark beating all desktop platforms, including the the Woodcrest and Intel Core2 "Extreme Processor" X6800 cpu's.

In dual framebuffer SLI mode the Ultra 40 M2 with 3.0 GHz 2222 SE dual core Opteron processors outperforms a Dell 690 (3.0 GHz Woodcrest) by 7% overall.

SPECapc Unigraphics NX 3 Benchmark(Larger numbers indicate greater speed)

System Overall
Composite
CPU
Composite
File I/0
Composite
Graphics
Composite
Sun Ultra 40 M2
2x3.0GHz Opteron 2222SE
2x FX 5600 (SLI)
9.61 4.47 2.93 20.95
Dell Precision 690
2x3.0GHz Woodcrest
2x FX 4600 (SLI)
8.98 3.52 3.06 27.95
Sun Ultra 40 M2
2.8GHz Opteron 2220SE
2x FX 5500 (SLI)
7.19 3.08 3.00 16.85
Dell Precision 690
3.0GHz Woodcrest
2x FX 4500 (SLI)
6.30 3.25 1.64 12.29
Current posted results at the SPEC website for the SPEC APC UGS-NX3 benchmark: http://www.spec.org/gpc/apc.data/specapc_nx3_summary.html

Benchmark Description

The SPEC APC MCAD benchmarks consist of tasks representative of what a designer would do in a typical session. This consists of "Graphics", "CPU", and "I/O" activities. A subscore is given for each of these subcategories as well as the overall score. The benchmark results shown here pertain to the SPEC APC UGS-NX3 benchmark. The MCAD application Unigraphics was used. This is a prominent system used by major engineering organizations worldwide.

The SPEC APC MCAD benchmark test suite for UGS-NX3 was developed under the auspices of the SPEC APC Committee. Results for a variety of current desktop platforms from various hardware vendors are shown at the SPEC APC website.

The characteristics of this MCAD application benchmark are very similar to other types of MCAD application benchmarks in that it consists of several groups of tasks each group involving different types of activity: graphics intensive, cpu intensive, and I/O intensive.

The benchmark scoring will improve with the clock rate of the processor. The cpu intensive operations are sufficiently large that faster dimms will definitely provide some benefit. The graphics operations are intensive enough that using a better framebuffer will also contribute to higher performance. In fact using a second framebuffer in nVidia SLI mode will also improve performance by providing up to double the graphics performance component. The models are large enough and the I/O big enough that using multiple striped disks to store the assemblies and parts as well as writing plot and other types of database and interface files will also improve performance .

Unigraphics is one of the prominent top 5 MCAD sytems used extensively by all sorts of diverse engineering organizations worldwide. There is a very big and broad market for the desktop platform that exhibits the leading price/performance with this code.

Disclosure Statement:

SPEC reg tm, SPECapc server mark of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Dell Precision 690,2xFX4600,overall composite 8.98; Sun Ultra 40 M2,2xFX5500,overall composite 7.19; Dell Precision 690,2xFX4500,overall composite 6.30. Sun Ultra 40 M2, 2xFX 5600, overall composite 9.61. Results from http://www.spec.org/gpc/apc.data/specapc_nx3_summary.html as of June 20, 2007.

Results
Dual
FX 5600
Dual
FX 5500
Overall Composite: 9.61 7.19
CPU Composite: 4.47 3.08
File I/O Composite: 2.93 3.00
Graphics Composite: 20.95 16.85
Reference Date: 06/08/07 11/10/06
System: Sun Ultra U40 M2 Sun Ultra U40 M2
Processor/GHz: Opteron 2222SE/3.0 Opteron 2220SE/2.8

System Configuration

Hardware Configuration:

Sun Ultra 40 M2

    2-socket 2x3.0 GHz dual core Opteron 2222 SE processors
    2x4x1 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms
    2x nVidia Quadro FX 5600 (SLI)

Sun Ultra 40 M2

    2-socket 2x2.8 GHz dual core Opteron 2200 processors
    2x4x1 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms
    2x nVidia Quadro FX 5500 (SLI)
Software Configuration:

64-bit Windows XP Pro SP 1

Unigraphics NX 3 (EDS-PLM Solutions)

SPEC APC UGS-NX3 Benchmark Test Suite

nVidia Quadro driver for Win XP: 160.02

[2] Comments
Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg

Sun Ultra 40 M2 Workstation New World Records in Performance

Wednesday Jan 10, 2007

Engineering Visualisation World Record: The Sun Ultra 40 M2 equipped with the new dual core 2.8 GHz Opteron 2220 SE processors, nVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffer(s) and 667 MHz DDR2 dimms has established new world records running the graphics-intensive engineering visualization Ensight benchmark with an overall Composite Score of 9.55

The world record was obtained on an Ultra 40 M2 with dual nVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffers operating in "split frame" SLI mode. The No. 2 result of 9.39 was obtained on the the same platform also with dual FX 5500 framebuffers but in "alternate frame" SLI mode.

The Ultra 40 M2 also set the world record for desktop platforms with a single framebuffer. Equipped with one nVidia Quadro FX 5500 the Ultra 40 M2 obtained an overall composite score of 9.29 ahead of the previous world record mark of 9.26 held by an H-P XW 8400 equipped with four 2.66 GHz Xeon processors and an nVidia Quadro FX 3500.

The next best overall composite score of 9.21 (5th spot) was recorderd on an Ultra 40 with single core 3.0 GHz Opteron 256 processors and an nVidia Quadro FX 4500. Sun Ultra 40 M2, Ultra 40 and Ultra 20 desktop configurations dominate the top 10.

Currently the best Ensight BM results for all hardware vendor platforms are obtained under a 64-bit Linux OS. The closest result under a Windows operating system was obtained on an Ultra 40 with dual single core 3.0 GHz Opteron 256 processors and with dual nVidia Quadro FX 4500 framebuffers in SLI mode.
Overall Composite Score: 8.86

Benchmark Information

The Sun Ultra 40 M2 workstation gives the best engineering visualization performance as demonstrated with the Ensight MCAE benchmark. The 5 task benchmark consists of graphics intensive operations that are representative of rendering activity. The benchmark also stresses the cpu and memory systems of the platform.

Ensight V8.0 Engineering MCAE Visualization Benchmark Composite score: weighted sum of task frame rates

System Processor Graphics OS Composite Score
Sun Ultra 40 M2 2x2.8 GHz DC 2220 SE 2xFX 5500 (SLI-SFR) SLED 10 9.55
Sun Ultra 40 M2 2x2.8 GHz DC 2220 SE 2xFX 5500 (SLI-AFR) SLED 10 9.39
Sun Ultra 40 M2 2x2.8 GHz DC 2220 SE FX 5500 SLED 10 9.29
HP XW 8400 4x2.66 GHz Xeon FX 3500 Linux 2.6 9.26
Sun Ultra 40 2x3.0 GHz 256 FX 4500 SLES 9 SP 3 9.21
Sun Ultra 40 2x2.8 GHz 254 FX 4500 SLES 9 SP 3 9.18
Sun Ultra 40 2x3.0 GHz 256 2xFX 4500 (SLI) Win64 XP 8.86
HP XW 9300 2x2.8 GHz 254 FX 3450 Win64 XP 8.67

For more results see Ensight website.

Benchmark Description

The Ensight Benchmark consists of five tests that stress the graphics system as well as the CPU and memory systems of a platform. All five tests operate on a geometry containing three parts with a total of 6324 quads and 128,534 triangles. These parts are then duplicated for a total of six instances. Thus the total number of polygons in the test are 37,944 quads and 771,204 triangles. All tests are run using a display area measuring 600x500 pixels. All polygons are randomly oriented (i.e., no stripping is done).

A description of the tasks follows:

  • The first test is a line drawing test which rotates the scene 360 degrees in 12 degree increments for 30 refreshes of the screen. The total number of lines drawn during the test is (37,944*4 + 771,204*3)*30 = 73,961,640 lines. Each part has a single color.
  • The second test is a shaded test which rotates the scene 360 degrees in 12 degree increments for 30 refreshes of the screen. The total number of polygons drawn during the test is 24,274,440. Each part has a single color.
  • The third test is a repeat of the second test, but here the parts are colored on a per vertex basis.
  • The fourth test is a repeat of the third test, except it is run in immediate mode (as opposed to display list mode for the previous tests). Immediate mode is used by Ensight for flipbook animations, hidden line display, and all detached (VR) displays.
  • The fifth test is a repeat of the fourth test, but here the two large isosurface parts are transparent and the rotation uses 72 degree increments for a total of 5 refreshes. This test stresses not only the graphics subsystem, but the cpu/memory as well since the polygons have to be sorted for each refresh of the screen.

The Ensight Benchmark composite score is a weighted average of the individual 5 tests. Given test times T1 through T5, the composite score C is computed as:

    C = 0.25*(30.0/T1) + 0.2*(30/T2) + 0.2*(30/T3) + 0.2*(30/T4) + 0.15*(5/T5)

Disclosure Statement:

Ensight V8.0 is a reg tm of CEI Corporation

    Approved Results http://www.ensight.com/rendering-performance-tests.html
    Reference Date 12 December 2006
     
    Platform Sun Ultra 40 M2 Workstation
    Total Number Processors 2
    Processor/MHz of Workstation Opteron 2220 SE /DC 2.8 GHz
    Memory 8x1 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms
    Operating System 64-bit SLED 10
    Graphics 2xnVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffers (SLI)
    Disks 2x250 GB 7200 rpm SATA striped
    Software Ensight V8.0
    Rendering Performance Benchmark
    Composite Score 9.55
    Total Elapsed Time 28.65 seconds
    Task Times (seconds) 2.27 2.31 2.33 5.83 15.90
    Task Frame Rates 13.19 13.00 12.89 5.14 0.31
     
    Platform Sun Ultra 40 M2 Workstation
    Total Number Processors 2
    Processor/MHz of Workstation Opteron 2220 SE /DC 2.8 GHz
    Memory 8x1 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms
    Operating System 64-bit SLED 10
    Graphics nVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffer
    Disks 2x250 GB 7200 rpm SATA striped
    Software Ensight V8.0
    Rendering Performance Benchmark
    Composite Score 9.29
    Total Elapsed Time 28.47 seconds
    Task Times (seconds) 2.34 2.36 2.45 5.75 15.57
    Task Frame Rates 12.84 12.72 12.22 5.21 0.32

Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg

SPECapc World Record - Sun beating Woodcrest

Tuesday Oct 24, 2006

Another result of Opteron beating Woodcrest.

The Sun Ultra 40 with dual nVidia Quadro FX 5500s set a world record on the SPEC APC UGS-NX3 MCAD graphics-oriented benchmark beating all desktops inluding those with the Woodcrest and Intel Core2 "Extreme Processor" X6800.

    The Ultra 40 with two FX 5500's sets the world record beating a Dell 690 with a 3GHz Woocrest and two FX 4500's by 15% overall and by 61% on graphics.

The Sun Ultra 40 with a single nVidia Quadro FX 5500 set a the world record for those with a single framebuffer on the SPEC APC UGS-NX3 benchmark.

    The Sun Ultra 40 with FX 5500 framebuffer outperforms all Woodcrest desktops:
    HP XW 6400 (4% overall, 39% on graphics), Dell Precision 690 (9% overall, 52% on graphics), and IBM Intellistation Z Pro 9228 (14% overall, 62% on graphics)
    The Sun Ultra 40 with FX 5500 framebuffer also beats all desktops equipped with the Intel 2.93 GHz X6800 "Extreme Processors":
    H-P XW 4400 (6% overall, 47% on graphics) and Dell Precision 390 (10% overall, 47% on graphics)

SPECapc Unigraphics NX 3 Benchmark Landscape (Larger is faster)
System Overall
Composite
CPU
Composite
File I/0
Composite
Graphics
Composite
Sun Ultra 40
3.0GHz Opteron 256
2x FX 5500 (SLI)
7.28 2.94 2.85 19.81
Dell Precision 690
3.0GHz Woodcrest
2x FX 4500 (SLI)
6.30 3.25 1.64 12.29
Sun Ultra 40
3.0GHz Opteron 256
FX 5500
5.66 2.94 1.96 10.11
HP xw6400 WS
3.0GHz Woodcrest
FX 4500
5.42 3.39 3.51 7.26
HP xw4400
2.93GHz X6800
FX 3500
5.33 3.40 4.52 6.87
Dell Precision 690
3.00 GHz Woodcrest
FX 3500
5.17 3.38 3.69 6.64
Dell Precision 390
2.93 GHz X6800
FX 3500
5.16 3.46 2.18 6.87
IBM Intellistation Z Pro 9228
3.0GHz Woodcrest
FX 3500
4.96 3.43 2.84 6.23

Current SPEC APC UGS-NX3 results at:
http://www.spec.org/gpc/apc.data/specapc_nx3_summary.html

Benchmark Description

The SPEC APC MCAD benchmarks consist of tasks representative of what a designer would do in a typical session. This consists of "Graphics", "CPU", and "I/O" activities. A subscore is given for each of these subcategories as well as the overall score. The benchmark results shown here pertain to the SPEC APC UGS-NX3 benchmark. The MCAD application Unigraphics was used. This is a prominent system used by major engineering organizations worldwide.

The characteristics of this MCAD application benchmark are very similar to other types of MCAD application benchmarks in that it consists of several groups of tasks each group involving different types of activity: graphics intensive, cpu intensive, and I/O intensive.

System Configuration

Sun Ultra 40

    2-socket 2x3.0 GHz single core Opteron 256 processors
    2x4x1 GB PC 3200 400 MHz dimms
    nVidia Quadro FX 5500

Sun Ultra 40

    2-socket 2x3.0 GHz single core Opteron 256 processors
    2x4x1 GB PC 3200 400 MHz dimms
    2x nVidia Quadro FX 5500 (SLI)
Software Configuration:
    64-bit Windows XP Pro SP 1
    Unigraphics NX 3 (EDS-PLM Solutions)
    SPEC APC UGS-NX3 Benchmark Test Suite
    nVidia Quadro driver for Win XP: 91.36

Disclosure Statements:

SPEC reg tm, SPECapc server mark of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of Oct 12, 2006. Sun Ultra 40, 2xFX 5500, overall composite 7.28; Dell Precision 690, 2xFX 4500, overall composite 6.30.

SPEC reg tm, SPECapc server mark of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of Oct 12, 2006. Sun Ultra 40, FX 5500, overall composite 5.66; HP xw6400, FX 4500, overall composite 5.42; Dell Precision 690, FX 3500, overall composite 5.17; IBM Intellistation Z Pro 9228, FX 3500, overall composite 4.96.

SPEC reg tm, SPECapc server mark of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of Oct 12, 2006. Sun Ultra 40, FX 5500, overall composite 5.66; HP xw4400, FX 3500, overall composite 5.33; Dell Precision 390, FX 3500, overall composite 5.16.

Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg