BM Seer Unofficial thoughts from an anonymous Sun employee

World Record MCAD: Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 Benchmarks Sun Ultra 24

Wednesday Oct 24, 2007

The Sun Ultra 24 desktop sets a world record in the MCAD market. The Ultra 24 beats competitive platforms from Dell, IBM, and HP. The single socket Ultra 24 can use either Intel dual-core and quad-core processors. The Sun Ultra 24 demonstrates both excellent performance and $/performance.

Pro/E is leading software MCAD system. Most major MCAE ISV applications have integration with Pro/E. Pro/E is used in a variety of different disciplines such as automotive, aircraft, aerospace, marine, oil&gas, earth moving, biomedical, heavy industry, atomic energy, etc.

Sun supports Pro/E on Opteron-based desktop platforms and Xeon-based platforms. Pro/E users appreciate Solaris for its maturity, reliability, suberb maintenanace and comprehensive well developed network features. This is a benefit for many engineering corporations that have distributed design.

The OCUS V5 benchmark has a 32-bit "Normal" benchmark and a newer 64-bit "Large Memory" benchmark to show performance on larger new workloads.

The 32-bit "Normal" OCUS V5 benchmark and World Record Ultra 24 Performance

  • The Sun Ultra 24 (3GHz QC Intel QX6850 Xeon processor, 8GB memory, an nVidia Quadr0 FX 5600 framebuffer, 2x15K SAS striped drives under 64-bit Win 2003 SP 2 XP 64-Ed. sets a new MCAD world record running the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 32-bit "Normal" benchmark beating all "legitimate" hardware vendors with results currently posted at the OCUS V5 www.proesite.com benchmark website.
  • Reruns on the same Ultra 24 platform but with a 3GHz DC Intel Xeon E6850 processor also with nVidia Quadro FX 5600 produced essentially identical world record results as obtained in the initial runs with a with a 3GHz QC E6850 processor.
  • Further reruns on the same Ultra 24 platform with a 3GHz DC Xeon E6850 but with an nVidia Quadro FX 1700 produced essentially identical world record results as obtained in the initial runs with a 3GHz QC QX6850 processor.
  • These results obtained with Pro/E WF 3 are better than any others posted at the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 "Normal" benchmark website by "legitimate" harware vendors. The top most competition comes from current Dell and HP desktop platforms both with the recent dual-core 3GHz Woodcrest 5160 Intel processors or the Intel Core2 Duo Extreme processors
  • The 64-bit "Large Memory" OCUS V5 benchmark and World Record Ultra 24 Performance

    • The Sun Ultra 24 with a 3GHz DC Intel Xeon E6850, 8GB memory, an nVidia Quadr0 FX 1700 framebuffer, 2x15K SAS striped drives under 64-bit Win 2003 SP 2 XP 64-Ed. sets a new MCAD world record running the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" benchmark
    • Reruns on the same Ultra 24 again with a 3GHz DC Intel Xeon E6850 but with the NVidia Quadro FX 5600 framebuffer instead of the NVidia Quadro FX 1700 also produced essentailly the same world record results.
    • Further reruns on the same Ultra 24 platform but now with a 3GHz QC Intel QX6850 processor (same nVidia Quadro FX 5600 framebuffer) produced essentially identical world record results as obtained in the initial runs with a 3GHz DC E6850 Xeon and an nVidia Quadro FX 1700 framebuffer.
    • These results obtained with Pro/E WF 3 are better than any others posted at the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS benchmark website. The top most competition comes from current Dell and HP desktop platforms both equipped with the recent dual core 3GHz Woodcrest 5160 Intel processors or the Intel Core2 Duo Extreme processors

    PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 32-bit "NORMAL" BENCHMARK Selected results are run times in seconds, smaller is better
    Ultra 24 vs. Topmost Current Posted Competitive Result
    Time (in seconds)
    Platform Processor Total Graphics CPU Disk I/O OS
    Ultra 24 1x3.0GHz QC Intel QX6850 1228 664 563 91 Win 64 XP
    Dell Prec 390 1x2.93GHz Intel Core2 X6800 1285 692 591 95 Win 64 XP

    PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" BENCHMARK

    Selected results are run times in seconds, smaller is better
    Ultra 24 vs. Topmost Current Posted Competitive Result

    Time (in seconds)
    Platform Processor Total Graphics CPU Disk I/O OS
    Ultra 24 1x3.0GHz DC Intel E6850 2809 877 1926 352 Win 64 XP
    Dell Prec. 490 1x3.0GHz DC Intel 5160 3026 1094 1925 341 Win 64 XP

    For results see OCUS website: http://www.proesite.com

    Results Summary

    PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 32-bit "NORMAL" BENCHMARK

    Submitted Results 32-bit "Normal" OCUS V5 Benchmark
    Reference Date 23 October 2007
    Platform Sun Ultra 24 Workstation
    Total Number Processors 1
    Processor/GHz of Workstation Intel QC QX6850/3.0 GHz
    Memory 4x2 GB DDR2 667MHz dimms
    Operating System Win 2003 SP 2 64 Ed.
    Graphics nVidia Quadro FX 5600 framebuffer
    Disks 2x146 GB 15K rpm SAS striped
    Software Pro/E Wildfire 3 (MCAD Application)
    OCUS V5 32-bit "Normal" Benchmark
    Total Elapsed Time 1228 seconds
    Total CPU Time 563 seconds
    Total Graphics Time 664 seconds
    Total Disk I/O Time 91 seconds

    PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" BENCHMARK
    Submitted Results 64-bit OCUS V5 Benchmark
    Reference Date 23 October 2007
    Platform Sun Ultra 24 Workstation
    Total Number Processors 1
    Processor/GHz of Workstation Intel DC E6850/3.0 GHz
    Memory 4x2 GB DDR2 667MHz dimms
    Operating System Win 2003 SP 2 64 Ed.
    Graphics nVidia Quadro FX 1700 framebuffer
    Disks 2x146 GB 15K rpm SAS striped
    Software Pro/E Wildfire 3 (MCAD Application)
    OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" Benchmark
    Total Elapsed Time 2809 seconds
    Total CPU Time 1926 seconds
    Total Graphics Time 877 seconds
    Total Disk I/O Time 352 seconds

    Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg
  • Sun Ultra 40 M2 Workstation New World Records in Performance

    Wednesday Jan 10, 2007

    Engineering Visualisation World Record: The Sun Ultra 40 M2 equipped with the new dual core 2.8 GHz Opteron 2220 SE processors, nVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffer(s) and 667 MHz DDR2 dimms has established new world records running the graphics-intensive engineering visualization Ensight benchmark with an overall Composite Score of 9.55

    The world record was obtained on an Ultra 40 M2 with dual nVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffers operating in "split frame" SLI mode. The No. 2 result of 9.39 was obtained on the the same platform also with dual FX 5500 framebuffers but in "alternate frame" SLI mode.

    The Ultra 40 M2 also set the world record for desktop platforms with a single framebuffer. Equipped with one nVidia Quadro FX 5500 the Ultra 40 M2 obtained an overall composite score of 9.29 ahead of the previous world record mark of 9.26 held by an H-P XW 8400 equipped with four 2.66 GHz Xeon processors and an nVidia Quadro FX 3500.

    The next best overall composite score of 9.21 (5th spot) was recorderd on an Ultra 40 with single core 3.0 GHz Opteron 256 processors and an nVidia Quadro FX 4500. Sun Ultra 40 M2, Ultra 40 and Ultra 20 desktop configurations dominate the top 10.

    Currently the best Ensight BM results for all hardware vendor platforms are obtained under a 64-bit Linux OS. The closest result under a Windows operating system was obtained on an Ultra 40 with dual single core 3.0 GHz Opteron 256 processors and with dual nVidia Quadro FX 4500 framebuffers in SLI mode.
    Overall Composite Score: 8.86

    Benchmark Information

    The Sun Ultra 40 M2 workstation gives the best engineering visualization performance as demonstrated with the Ensight MCAE benchmark. The 5 task benchmark consists of graphics intensive operations that are representative of rendering activity. The benchmark also stresses the cpu and memory systems of the platform.

    Ensight V8.0 Engineering MCAE Visualization Benchmark Composite score: weighted sum of task frame rates

    System Processor Graphics OS Composite Score
    Sun Ultra 40 M2 2x2.8 GHz DC 2220 SE 2xFX 5500 (SLI-SFR) SLED 10 9.55
    Sun Ultra 40 M2 2x2.8 GHz DC 2220 SE 2xFX 5500 (SLI-AFR) SLED 10 9.39
    Sun Ultra 40 M2 2x2.8 GHz DC 2220 SE FX 5500 SLED 10 9.29
    HP XW 8400 4x2.66 GHz Xeon FX 3500 Linux 2.6 9.26
    Sun Ultra 40 2x3.0 GHz 256 FX 4500 SLES 9 SP 3 9.21
    Sun Ultra 40 2x2.8 GHz 254 FX 4500 SLES 9 SP 3 9.18
    Sun Ultra 40 2x3.0 GHz 256 2xFX 4500 (SLI) Win64 XP 8.86
    HP XW 9300 2x2.8 GHz 254 FX 3450 Win64 XP 8.67

    For more results see Ensight website.

    Benchmark Description

    The Ensight Benchmark consists of five tests that stress the graphics system as well as the CPU and memory systems of a platform. All five tests operate on a geometry containing three parts with a total of 6324 quads and 128,534 triangles. These parts are then duplicated for a total of six instances. Thus the total number of polygons in the test are 37,944 quads and 771,204 triangles. All tests are run using a display area measuring 600x500 pixels. All polygons are randomly oriented (i.e., no stripping is done).

    A description of the tasks follows:

    • The first test is a line drawing test which rotates the scene 360 degrees in 12 degree increments for 30 refreshes of the screen. The total number of lines drawn during the test is (37,944*4 + 771,204*3)*30 = 73,961,640 lines. Each part has a single color.
    • The second test is a shaded test which rotates the scene 360 degrees in 12 degree increments for 30 refreshes of the screen. The total number of polygons drawn during the test is 24,274,440. Each part has a single color.
    • The third test is a repeat of the second test, but here the parts are colored on a per vertex basis.
    • The fourth test is a repeat of the third test, except it is run in immediate mode (as opposed to display list mode for the previous tests). Immediate mode is used by Ensight for flipbook animations, hidden line display, and all detached (VR) displays.
    • The fifth test is a repeat of the fourth test, but here the two large isosurface parts are transparent and the rotation uses 72 degree increments for a total of 5 refreshes. This test stresses not only the graphics subsystem, but the cpu/memory as well since the polygons have to be sorted for each refresh of the screen.

    The Ensight Benchmark composite score is a weighted average of the individual 5 tests. Given test times T1 through T5, the composite score C is computed as:

      C = 0.25*(30.0/T1) + 0.2*(30/T2) + 0.2*(30/T3) + 0.2*(30/T4) + 0.15*(5/T5)

    Disclosure Statement:

    Ensight V8.0 is a reg tm of CEI Corporation

      Approved Results http://www.ensight.com/rendering-performance-tests.html
      Reference Date 12 December 2006
       
      Platform Sun Ultra 40 M2 Workstation
      Total Number Processors 2
      Processor/MHz of Workstation Opteron 2220 SE /DC 2.8 GHz
      Memory 8x1 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms
      Operating System 64-bit SLED 10
      Graphics 2xnVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffers (SLI)
      Disks 2x250 GB 7200 rpm SATA striped
      Software Ensight V8.0
      Rendering Performance Benchmark
      Composite Score 9.55
      Total Elapsed Time 28.65 seconds
      Task Times (seconds) 2.27 2.31 2.33 5.83 15.90
      Task Frame Rates 13.19 13.00 12.89 5.14 0.31
       
      Platform Sun Ultra 40 M2 Workstation
      Total Number Processors 2
      Processor/MHz of Workstation Opteron 2220 SE /DC 2.8 GHz
      Memory 8x1 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms
      Operating System 64-bit SLED 10
      Graphics nVidia Quadro FX 5500 framebuffer
      Disks 2x250 GB 7200 rpm SATA striped
      Software Ensight V8.0
      Rendering Performance Benchmark
      Composite Score 9.29
      Total Elapsed Time 28.47 seconds
      Task Times (seconds) 2.34 2.36 2.45 5.75 15.57
      Task Frame Rates 12.84 12.72 12.22 5.21 0.32

    Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg