Thursday Apr 10, 2008
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server
delivers the best performance on the SPEC OMPM2001
benchmark for two chips.
These results were run on the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server
using the UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor running at 1.4 GHz.
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server
running the UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor at 1.4 GHz,
beat all dual chip scores running SPECompM2001 with
a score of 25488.
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server
running the UltraSPARC T2 Plus processor at 1.4 GHz,
beat all dual chip scores running SPECompM_base2001 with
a score of 21145.
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 server running at 1.4 GHz beat the best
IBM dual chip result (POWER6) by 25% on the SPECompM2001 benchmark.
SPEComp2001 Performance Chart -
SPECompM2001 (bigger is better)
Select 2 chip or less results ordered by peak metric.
| Result |
Chips |
Cores |
OpenMP Thrds |
System |
| Peak |
Base |
| 25488 |
21145 |
2 |
8 |
128 |
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240, UltraSPARC T2 Plus, 1.4GHz |
| 20443 |
18950 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
IBM p 520, POWER6, 4.2 GHz |
| 19983 |
15355 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
IBM p5 550, POWER5+, 2.1 GHz |
| 19688 |
17980 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
IBM JS22, POWER6, 4.0 GHz |
| 19568 |
18218 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
IBM JS22, POWER6, 4.0 GHz |
| 16208 |
14399 |
1 |
8 |
63 |
Sun SE T5120/T5220, US T2, 1.4 GHz |
Benchmark Description
The SPEC OMPM2001 Benchmark Suite was released in June 2001 and
tests HPC performance using OpenMP for parallelism.
-
11 programs (3 in C and 8 in Fortran)
parallelized using OpenMP API
Goals of suite:
- Targeted to mid-range (4-32 processor) parallel systems
- Run rules, tools and reporting similar to SPEC CPU2000
- Programs representative of HPC and Scientific Applications
Disclosure Statement:
SPEC, SPEComp reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Sun result submitted to SPEC.
Other results from www.spec.org as of 4/6/08.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 (2 chips, 16 cores, 128 threads, 1.4GHz)
25488 SPECompM2001.
SPEC, SPEComp reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Sun result submitted to SPEC.
Other results from www.spec.org as of 4/6/08.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 (2 chips, 16 cores, 128 threads, 1.4GHz)
21145 SPECompM_base2001.
SPEC, SPEComp reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Sun result submitted to SPEC.
Other results from www.spec.org as of 4/6/08.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240 (2 chips, 16 cores, 128 threads, 1.4GHz)
25294 SPECompM2001.
IBM p 520 (2 chips, 4 cores, 8 threads, 4.2GHz) 20443 SPECompM2001.
Results Summary
| Result |
|
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5240: |
|
25488 SPECompM2001 |
|
|
|
21145 SPECompM_base2001 |
| Reference Date: |
|
Apr 09, 2008 |
| Operating System: |
|
Solaris 10 8/07 |
| Compiler: |
|
Sun Studio 12 |
Thursday Jun 14, 2007
The Sun Blade X6220 (Opteron 2222SE) delivers the best performance on the SPEC OMPM2001
benchmark suite of all systems running 4-threads results.
The Sun Blade X6220 server in an two-way, dual-core configuration,
produced best 4-thread SPECompM2001 result of 13847.
The results show that the combination of Solaris 10 using Sun
Studio 12 is unmatched by the competition for
assisting users in writing parallel code.
How does this compare to a 4-thead IBM POWER6?
We don't know it is just another benchmark that IBM doesn't publish on.
But we know that 32-thread IBM System p 570 (4.7 GHz, 32 threads, 16 cores,
8 chip) result of 86,624 SPECompMpeak2001. This is 8 times more threads than what
we need to make a useful comparison, or do the math. Check the IBM system
pricing to see the expense of a POWER6 versus blades.
SPECompM2001 Performance - peak, bigger is better
| Result |
Cores |
Chips |
Threads |
System |
| Peak |
Base |
| 13847 |
13348 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sun Blade X6220, Opteron 2222SE, 3.0GHz |
| 13817 |
13195 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
Sun Fire V40z, Opteron 254, 2.8GHz |
| 13222 |
12763 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sun Fire X4100/X4200 M2, Opteron 2220SE, 2.8GHz |
| 12574 |
12127 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sun Fire X2200 M2, Opteron 2218, 2.6GHz |
| 10964 |
10424 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sun Fire X4100, Opteron 285, 2.6GHz |
| 8174 |
8141 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
IBM System p5 520 (1900 MHz, 2 CPU) |
Benchmark Description
The SPEC OMPM2001 Benchmark Suite was released in June 2001 and
tests HPC performance using OpenMP for parallelism.
-
11 programs (3 in C and 8 in Fortran)
parallelized using OpenMP API
Goals of suite:
- Targeted to mid-range (4-32 processor) parallel systems
- Run rules, tools and reporting similar to SPEC CPU2000
- Programs representative of HPC and Scientific Applications
Disclosure Statement:
SPEC, SPEComp reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results from www.spec.org as of Jun 6, 2007, Sun result submitted to SPEC.
Sun Blade X6220 (4 cores, 2 chips, 4 threads), 13,847 SPECompM2001.
Sockets refers to chips.
32-thead 16-core IBM System p 570 (4.7 GHz, 8 chip, 32 threads) result (86,624 SPECompMpeak2001), submitted to SPEC, but IBM does not list the date on their
official website http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/p/benchmarks/hpc.html, why not?
System Configuration
| Result |
|
X6220 4-threads: |
|
13847 SPECompM2001 |
| Reference Date: |
|
Jun 06, 2007 |
| System: |
|
Sun Blade X6220 16GB memory (4x2GB per chip), DDR667 |
| Total Number Processors: |
|
2 |
| Processor/GHz of Server: |
|
Opteron 2222SE, 3.0 GHz |
| Operating System: |
|
Solaris 10 11/06 |
| Compiler: |
|
Sun Studio 12 |
See Also
sun.com X6220 Blade Benchmark Page
Wednesday Jan 03, 2007
(Update with corrections of previous entry)
Sun Fire X4100/X4200M2 4-thread 2-socket World Record, shows that
Solaris 10 and Sun Studio 11 are faster than Opterons running Linux (31% faster than PGI and 8% faster than Pathscale compilers).
The Sun Fire X4100/X4200M2 two-way dual-core server produced best SPECompM2001 result of 13222.
Sun Solaris 10/Studio11 was 31% faster than Linux/PGI with
AMD Tyan system using SuSE Linux SLES9 SP3 64-bit/PGI 6.2-4. The AMD Tyan even used faster CL4 DIMMs. Both results submitted Nov 2006.
The Sun Fire X4100/X4200M2 also topped the IBM p5 520 POWER5+ 1.9GHz AIX5L V5.3 result by 61%.
Solaris/Studio 11 is 8% faster than Linux SuSE SLES9 SP3 64bit using QLogic PathScale Compiler Suite v2.5.
There is a growing body of favorable comparisons showing
Solaris advantages over Linux on performance. Remember the
previous BM Seer posting on Java performance.
Even more examples of Solaris beating Linux coming soon.
SPECompM2001 Results (bigger is better)
| SPECompM2001 |
Cores |
Chips |
Thrds |
System |
| 13222 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sun Fire X4100/X4200 M2, Opteron 2220SE, 2.8GHz |
| 12574 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
Sun Fire X2200 M2, Opteron 2218, 2.6GHz |
| 12172 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
AMD Tyan n6650w, Opteron 8220, 2.8GHz |
| 10085 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
AMD Tyan n6650w, Opteron 8220, 2.8GHz |
| 8174 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
IBM System p5 520 (1900 MHz, 2 CPU) |
Benchmark Description
The SPEC OMPM2001 Benchmark Suite was released in June 2001 and
tests HPC performance using OpenMP for parallelism. It consists of
11 programs (8 in Fortran and 3 in C) parallelized using OpenMP API.
Goals of the benchmark:
Targeted to mid-range (4-32 processor) parallel systems
Run rules, tools and reporting similar to SPEC CPU2000
Programs representative of HPC and Scientific Applications
See Also:
SPEC OMP2001 Page
sun.com X4100 Benchmark Page
sun.com X4200 Benchmark Page
Disclosure Statement:
SPEC, SPEComp reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results from www.spec.org Results as of Jan 2, 2007.
Sun Fire X4100/X4200 M2 (4 cores, 2 chips, 4 threads), 13,222 SPECompM2001.
AMD Tyan n6650w (4 cores, 2 chips, 4 threads), 10,085 SPECompM2001 PGI compiler.
AMD Tyan n6650w (4 cores, 2 chips, 4 threads), 12,172 SPECompM2001 Pathscale compiler. Sockets refers to chips.
Results Summary
|
X4100/X4200 M2 4-threads: |
|
13222 SPECompM2001 |
|
X2200 M2 4-threads: |
|
12574 SPECompM2001 |
| Reference Date: |
|
Oct 16, 2006 |
| System: |
|
Sun Fire X4100/X4200M2 16GB memory (4x2GB per chip), DDR667 |
| Processors: |
|
two Opteron 2220SE, 2.8 GHz |
| Operating System: |
|
Solaris 10 |
| Compiler: |
|
Sun Studio 11 |
Wednesday Dec 20, 2006
This entry has been updated, for the latest please go to:
http://blogs.sun.com/bmseer/entry/update_solaris_beating_linux_performance.
How does a new IBM Power6 at 5Ghz compare?
My Opinion, UltraSPARC T2 really make 4.7GHz IBM p...