Monday Dec 08, 2008
The Sun Fire X4450 64GB with four 2.933 GHz Quad-core Xeon X7350
obtained 39,793 SPECweb2005 using only 883 watts. The Sun Fire X4450
was running SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2 with Accoria Networks,
Rock Web
Server v1.4.7 and Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.3.2. This result
demonstrates Sun Microsystems continued commitment
to deliver the high performing servers, regardless of operating system
environments.
The Sun Fire X4450 with 2.933GHz QC Xeons with 64GB of memory had an
average power consumption of 883 watts. The average
power consumption was measured for each of the three SPECweb2005
benchmark workloads during the steady state load period at peak load.
The power-performance for the Sun Fire X4450 is .022,
power-performance is computed as watt/performance. Since
power-performance is related to price/performance they are both
calculated with performance in the denominator.
This result
is competitive to the HP ProLiant DL580 G5, HP's 4 socket Xeon
X7350 offering.
The Sun Fire X4450 with 4x10Gb network links obtained similar
performance to the HP DL580 G5 with 16x1Gb network links. By
obtaining similar performance with fewer networks, IT management costs
and server power consumption are reduced.
Competitive Landscape
Selected SPECweb2005 benchmark results as of 12/04/2008. Complete
information at: http://www.spec.org
website.
System OS |
Chips, Cores
/Chip |
CPU (GHz) |
Web Server |
SPEC web 2005 |
Bank |
Ecom |
Supp |
HP PL DL585 G5 RedHat Linux |
4, 4 |
AMD 8356 QC (2.3) |
Rock1.4.7/ JRock v1.3.2 |
43854 |
76032 |
62304 |
39456 |
Fujitsu RX600 S4 RedHat Linux |
4, 4 |
Xeon QC X7350 (2.93) |
Rock1.4.7/ JRock v1.3.2 |
42783 |
75008 |
59264 |
39040 |
Sun SE T5220 Sol 10 05/08 |
1, 8 |
US T2 (1.4) |
Sun JSWS 7.0 U3 |
41847 |
70000 |
58000 |
40000 |
HP PL DL580 G5 RedHat Linux |
4, 4 |
Xeon QC X7350 (2.93) |
Rock1.4.6/JRock v1.3.1 |
40046 |
71104 |
55552 |
36032 |
Sun Fire X4450 SLES 10 SP2 |
4, 4 |
Xeon QC X7350 (2.93) |
Rock1.4.7/ JRock v1.3.2 |
39793 |
70500 |
57000 |
34750 |
Sun Fire X4240 RedHat Linux |
2, 4 |
AMD QC 2360SE (2.5) |
Rock1.4.7/ JRock v1.3.2 |
32288 |
53048 |
50008 |
28120 |
HP PL DL580 G5 RedHat Linux |
4, 4 |
Xeon QC X7350 (2.93) |
Rock1.4.1/JRock v1.2.0 |
30261 |
52160 |
42048 |
28000 |
HP PL DL385 G5 RedHat Linux |
2, 4 |
AMD 2356 QC (2.3) |
Rock1.4.6/JRock v1.3.1 |
30007 |
50856 |
46020 |
25584 |
HP PL DL380 G5 RedHat Linux |
2,4 |
Xeon QC X5460 (3.16) |
Rock1.4.6/ JRock v1.3.1 |
29591 |
51840 |
46512 |
23816 |
IBM p5 550 SuSE Linux |
2, 2 |
DC Pow5+ (1.9) |
Zeus4.3r1/ Tomcat 5.5.9 |
7881 |
12240 |
11820 |
7500 |
Measured power consumption from Sun Fire X4450 64GB with 4 2.933GHz QC Xeon, smaller watt/performance is better.
| System |
Work- load Ave |
watt / perf |
Banking |
Ecomm |
Support |
Avg Watts |
Min, Max Watt |
Avg Watt |
Min, Max Watt |
Avg Watt |
Min, Max Watt |
| 1 x Sun Fire X4450 64GB 4-chip 2.93GHz QC Xeon |
883w |
.0222 |
903w |
781w, 923w |
881w |
620w, 906w |
867w |
734w, 897w |
| 1 x Sun Fire T5220 64GB 1-chip 1.4GHz US T2 |
617w |
.0147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 x Sun Fire X4240 32GB 2-chip 2.5GHz QC Opteron |
521w |
.0161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At peak load, the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 with 64GB had an average power consumption of 617 watts for the three SPECweb2005 benchmark workloads at steady-state measured watts during benchmark run. A blog about this result at: http://blogs.sun.com/bmseer/entry/sun_s_even_faster_specweb2005
At peak load, the Sun SPARC Enterprise X4240 with 32GB had an average power consumption of 521 watts for the three SPECweb2005 benchmark workloads at steady-state measured watts during benchmark run.
You can look up competitive watts at:
HP DL580 power consumption from HP Power Calculator system configured with 4 x2.93GHz processors, redundant PSU, 16 x 4GB DIMMs, 8 x 36GB SAS drives,1 x PCI card, 80% utilisation:
http://h30099.www3.hp.com/configurator/powercalcs.asp
HP DL380G5 power consumption from HP Power Calculator for system configured with 2 x X5460 3.16GHz processors, redundant PSU, 8 x 4GB DIMMs, 2 x HBAs and 2 x 146GB SAS drives, 80% utilisation:
http://h30099.www3.hp.com/configurator/powercalcs.asp
Benchmark Description
SPECweb2005, is the latest industry standard benchmark for evaluating
Web Server performance developed by SPEC. The benchmark simulates
multiple user sessions accessing a Web Server and generating static and
dynamic HTTP
requests. The major features of SPECweb2005 are:
- Measures simultaneous user sessions
- Dynamic content: currently PHP and JSP implementations
- Page images requested using 2 parallel HTTP connections
- Multiple, standardized workloads: Banking (HTTPS), E-commerce
(HTTP and HTTPS), and Support (HTTP)
- Simulates browser caching effects
- File accesses more accurately simulate today's disk access
patterns
Example Disclosure Statement:
Sun Fire X4450 (16 cores, 4 chips) 39793 SPECweb2005. HP ProLiant
DL585 G5 ( 16 core, 4 chips) 43854 SPECweb2005. Fujitsu Siemems
Primergy RX600 S4 (16 cores, 4 chips) 42783 SPECweb2005.
Sun SPARC Enterprise X5220 (8 cores, 1 chip) 41847 SPECweb2005.
HP ProLiant DL585 G5 (16 cores/4 chips) 40046 SPECweb2005 (re-run of
2.93GHz). Sun Fire X4240 (8 cores, 2 chips) 32288
SPECweb2005. HP ProLiant DL585 G5 (16 cores, 4 chips) 30261
SPECweb2005 (initial 2.93 GHz run). HP ProLiant DL385 G5 (8
cores, 2 chips) 30007
SPECweb2005. HP ProLiant DL380 G5 (8 cores, 2 chips) 29591
SPECweb2005. PRIMERGY TX300 S4 (8 cores, 2 chips) 28127
SPECweb2005. IBM p5 550 (4 cores, 2 chips) 7881 SPECweb2005.
SPEC, SPECweb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Results from www.spec.org as of Dec 4, 2008.
Sun Fire X4450 server power consumption was taken from measurements
made during the benchmark runs of each workload at peak load, during
the steady state load period. The power is the average measured watts
during the benchmark run.
Results Summary
| Results |
39793 SPECweb2005 |
| Reference Date: |
Dec 4, 2008 |
| Systems: |
1 x Sun Fire X4450, 64GB |
| Total Number Processors: |
4 chips / 4 cores per chip |
| Processor/GHz of Server: |
4 x Xeon 7350 2.933 GHz |
| Operating System: |
SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 SP2
|
| Software: |
Rock Web Server v1.4.7 & Rock JSP/Servlet Container
v1.3.2
|
|
Java HotSpot[TM] 64-Bit Server VM on Linux, Version
1.6.0_06 Performance Release
|
Tuesday Oct 09, 2007
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 obtained a world record SPECweb2005
result 37,001 SPECweb2005 with one UltraSPARC T2
running Solaris 10 with Sun Java System Web Server.
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 server delivers 22% greater
performance than the four-socket HP ProLiant DL580 G5 with 2.9 GHz
Quad-Core Xeon processors. In addition, the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220
has 2.1x better power-performance and has 4.1x better SWaP.
Yes, beats FOUR SOCKETs filled with QUAD_CORE!
See below if you are not familiar with SWaP and why you should care
about the SWaP 'figure of merit.'
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 server delivers 66% greater
performance than the 4-socket HP ProLiant DL585 G2 with 3 GHz dual-core
Opteron processors. In addition, the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220
has 2.2x better power-performance and has 4.4x better SWaP.
There are no IBM POWER6 results on the SPECweb benchmark.
The Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 server is 4.7 times faster than the
4-core IBM p550 1.9GHz POWER5+. In addition, the Sun SPARC Enterprise
T5220 has 5.7x better power-performance and has 11.5x better SWaP.
This
world record benchmark result
clearly demonstrates that the Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 running the
Solaris 10 08/07 and Java System Webserver 7.0 Update 2 can support
thousands of
concurrent secure and non secure web server sessions while allowing
larger and more complex
Java applications to be run and is an industry leader in web
serving.
Cryptography performance is enhanced on the Sun SPARC Enterprise
T5220 by using UltraSPARC T2's enhanced
on-chip cryptographic hardware with Solaris 10's secured web service
software feature. SPECweb2005's banking workload
highlights the server's secure web server performance. The Sun
SPARC Enterprise T5220 (63,000
SPECweb2005_Banking) performance was 21% greater than the 2.9 GHz
Quad-Core Xeon HP ProLiant DL580 G5 (52,160
SPECweb2005_Banking).
The SWaP metric is a measure of server efficiency ratio that
includes system performance, power and space consumption on a specific
benchmark. (SWaP = Perf /[ Space (RU) x Watts ] )
One thing you'll note is Sun execs are using the term "power-performance",
maybe they've been getting the word from some of us that it should
be coputed as "watt/perf".
Power-performance is computed as watt/performance. Since
power-performance is related to $/perf they are both
calculated with "performance" in the denominator.
Competitive Landscape
Selected SPECweb2005 benchmark results as of 10/04/2007. Complete
information at: http://www.spec.org
website.
| System |
Chip, Core |
Proc GHz |
OS |
Web Server |
SPEC web 2005 |
Bank |
Ecom |
Supp |
| Sun SE T5220 |
1, 8 |
US T2/1.4 |
Solaris 08/07 |
Sun JSWS 7.0u2 |
37001 |
63000 |
49500 |
36000 |
| HP PL DL580 G5 |
4, 4 |
Xeon QC 2.993GHz |
RedHat Linux |
Rock1.4.0 JRock1.2.0 |
30261 |
52160 |
42048 |
28000 |
| HP PL DL585 G2 |
4, 2 |
Opteron DC 3GHz |
RedHat Linux |
Rock1.4.0 JRock1.2.0 |
22254 |
38400 |
30720 |
20704 |
| HP PL ML370 G5 |
4, 4 |
Xeon QC 2.66GHz |
RedHat Linux |
Rock1.4.0 JRock v1.2.0 |
19661 |
34720 |
27264 |
17792 |
| Sun Fire T2000 |
1, 8 |
US T1 1.4GHz |
Solaris 11/06 |
Sun JSWS 6.1 SP5 64b |
16407 |
25812 |
24048 |
15768 |
| Sun Fire T2000 |
1, 8 |
US T1 1.2GHz |
Solaris |
Sun JSWS 6.1 SP5 64b |
14001 |
21500 |
21500 |
13160 |
| Sun Fire T1000 |
1, 8 |
US T1 1.0 GHz |
Solaris |
Sun JSWS 6.1 SP5 64b |
10466 |
20000 |
16500 |
7700 |
| IBM p5 550 |
2, 2 |
POWER5+ 1.9GHz |
SuSE Linux |
Zeus4.3r1 Tomcat5.5.9 |
7881 |
12240 |
11820 |
7500 |
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 results currently under SPEC review.
Benchmark Description
SPECweb2005, is the latest
industry standard benchmark for evaluating Web Server performance
developed by SPEC. The benchmark simulates multiple user sessions
accessing a Web Server and generating static and dynamic HTTP
requests. The major features of SPECweb2005 are:
- Measures simultaneous user sessions
- Dynamic content: currently PHP and JSP implementations
- Page images requested using 2 parallel HTTP connections
- Multiple, standardized workloads: Banking (HTTPS), E-commerce
(HTTP and HTTPS), and Support (HTTP)
- Simulates browser caching effects
- File accesses more accurately simulate today's disk access
patterns
Disclosure Statement:
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 (8 cores, 1 chip) 37001 SPECweb2005,
submitted to SPEC for review on October 8, 2007. HP ProLiant
DL580 G5 (16 cores, 4 chips) 30261 SPECweb2005. HP ProLiant DL585 G2 (8 cores, 4 chips) 22254 SPECweb2005.; HP ProLiant ML370 G5 (16 cores, 4 chips) 19661
SPECweb2005. HP ProLiant DL580 G4 (8 cores, 4 chips) 18981
SPECweb2005. Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores, 1 chip) 16407
SPECweb2005. Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores, 1 chip) 14001
SPECweb2005. Sun Fire T1000 (8 cores, 1 chip) 10466
SPECweb2005. IBM p5 550 (4 cores, 2 chips) 7881
SPECweb2005. SPEC, SPECweb reg tm of Standard Performance
Evaluation Corporation. Results from www.spec.org as of Oct 8, 2007.
Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 server power consumption taken
from measurements made during the benchmark run.
Power is average measured watts during
benchmark run.
HP DL580 power consumption from HP Power Calculator system configured
with 4 x2.93GHz processors, redundant PSU, 16 x 4GB DIMMs, 8 x
36GB SAS drives,1 x PCI card, 80% utilisation on 9/10/07: http://h30099.www3.hp.com/configurator/powercalcs.asp
HP DL385G2 power consumption from HP Power Calculator for system
configured with 2 x AMD 2220 2.8GHz processors, redundant PSU, 8 x 4GB
DIMMs, 2 x HBAs and 2 x 146GB SAS drives, 80% utilisation on 6/4/07: http://h30099.www3.hp.com/configurator/powercalcs.asp
IBM 550 power specifications calculated by applying 70% of the Maximum
Watts published in “Facts and Features Report”, 11/14/06, posted
atftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_sp/n/PSB01628USEN/PSB01628USEN.PDF.
Results Summary
| Certified Results |
37,001 SPECweb2005 |
| Reference Date: |
October 9, 2007 |
| Systems: |
1 x Sun SPARC Enterprise T5220 |
| Total Number Processors: |
1 chip / 8 cores (8 threads/core) |
| CPU/GHz of Server: |
Sun UltraSPARC T2 1.4 GHz |
| Operating System: |
Solaris 10 08/07 + patches
|
| Software: |
Sun Java[TM] System Web Server 7.0 Update 2
|
Tuesday Jan 09, 2007
The Sun Fire T2000 obtained a world record single-socket 16,407 SPECweb2005
with one UltraSPARC T1 and 64 GB memory running Solaris 10 11/06 with
Sun Java[TM] System Web Server 6.1 SP5 64-bit web server.
The Sun Fire T2000 had an average power consumption of 340 watts for
all benchmark workloads at steady-state.
Secured web server is critical for most of today's datacenters,
unfortunately other vendors have a big performance and cost penalty
for security.
The Sun
Fire T2000 has a unique hardware design and coupled with Solaris 10's software features secured web services only adds 10%.
Now users can use SSL-enabled web service by default. This is a huge
advantage for Sun customers.
Various Comparisons
- The Sun Fire T2000 delivers 24% faster on SPECweb2005
than the 4-core HP DL380G5 with 3.0GHz Intel Xeon 5160
(WoodCrest), while consuming 2.5X less power, and up to
3x higher SWaP.
- The Sun Fire T2000 is 13% faster on SPECweb2005
performance than the 4-core Dell PowerEdge 2950 with 3.0GHz Intel Xeon
5160 (WoodCrest).
- The Sun Fire T2000 is 10% faster on SPECweb2005 than the 8-core Fujitsu Siemens PRIMERGY RX600 S3 with
Intel Xeon 7140M.
- The Sun Fire T2000 is 10% faster on SPECweb2005
than the 8-core HP ProLiant DL585 G2 with 2.0 GHz AMD
Opteron 8212.
- The Sun Fire T2000 is 4% faster on SPECweb2005
than the 8-core HP Proliant DL585 with 2.6GHz AMD Opteron
885.
- The Dell 2950 equipped with 2 of
the latest Quad-core Intel Xeon 5300 Series “Clovertown”
running Red Hat Enterprise Linux delivers only 3% higher throughput
than the single socket Sun Fire T2000, but consumes nearly 55% more
power. As a result the T2000 delivers 1.5X better Performance per Watt
and SWaP
- The Sun Fire T2000 is 208% faster on SPECweb2005
than the 4-core IBM p5 550 with 1.9GHz POWER5+.
The Sun Java[TM] System Web Server 6.1 Service Pack 5 for 64-bit
Solaris 10 on SPARC hardware is optimized to leverage the 64-bit
processing environments.
This world record benchmark result
clearly demonstrates that the Sun Fire T2000 running the Solaris 10
OS and Java System Webserver 6.1 SP5 can support thousands of
concurrent web server sessions while allowing larger and more complex
Java applications to be run.
SPECweb2005 Benchmark Performance as of 01/09/2007.
all results at http://www.spec.org website.
| System |
CPU MHz
|
OS |
Web Server
|
SPEC web2005 |
Bank/Ecom/Supp
| Watts
|
HP/Proliant
DL585 G2
|
AMD Opteron
8220 @ 2.8GHz
(4 chips, 2 cores/chip) |
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
20235
|
36400/28000/18016
|
|
Dell/PowerEdge
2950
|
Intel Xeon
X5355 (Clovertown) @ 2.66GHz
(2 Chips, 4 cores/chip)
|
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 AS Update 3 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
16830
|
33250/20500/15500
|
525
|
| Sun/Sun
Fire T2000 |
UltraSPARC
T1 @ 1.4 GHz
(1 Chip, 8 Cores/Chip,
4 threads/core) |
Solaris
10 11/06 |
Sun
Java [TM]
System Web Server
6.1 SP5 64-bit |
16407
|
25812/24048/15768
|
340
|
| HP/Proliant
DL585 |
AMD Opteron
885 @ 2.6GHz
(4 chips, 2 cores/chip) |
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
15850
|
32992/25024/10688
|
|
| HP/Proliant
DL585 G2 |
AMD Opteron
8212 @ 2.0GHz
(4 chips, 2 cores/chip) |
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
14964
|
27200/20960/13024
|
812
|
| Fujitsu/PRIMERGY
RX600 S3 |
Intel Xeon
7140M @ 3.4GHz
(4 chips, 2 cores/chip)
|
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
14896
|
25260/21480/13500
|
|
| Dell/PowerEdge
2950 |
Intel Xeon
5160 (Woodcrest) @ 3.0GHz
(2 Chips, 2 cores/chip)
|
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 Update 3 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
14495
|
23800/20400/13900
|
|
Sun/Sun
Fire T2000
|
UltraSPARC
T1 @ 1.2 GHz
(1 Chip, 8 Cores/Chip,
4 threads/core) |
Solaris
10 3/05 HW2 plus patches
|
Sun
Java [TM]
System Web Server
6.1 SP5 64-bit |
14001 |
21500/21500/13160 |
339
|
| HP/Proliant
DL380 G5 |
Intel Xeon
5160 (Woodcrest) @ 3.0GHz
(2 Chips, 2 cores/chip) |
RH
Enterprise Linux 4 Update 4 |
Accoria Rock
Web Server v1.4.0 (x86_64), Accoria Rock JSP/Servlet Container v1.2.0
(x86_64) |
13257
|
23808/20400/10632
|
835
|
| Sun/Sun
Fire T1000 |
UltraSPARC
T1 @ 1.0 GHz
(1 Chip, 8 Cores/Chip,
4 threads/core) |
Solaris
10 6/06
|
Sun
Java [TM]
System Web Server
6.1 SP5 64-bit |
10466 |
20000/16500/7700 |
178 |
IBM/IBM
System p5 550
|
POWER5+
@
1.9 GHz
(2 Chips, 2 Cores/Chip
w SMT)
|
SLES 9
SP2 |
Zeus
4.3r1
(64 bit),
Apache Tomcat 5.5.9 plus
Compat 5.5.9
|
7881
|
12240/11820/7500
|
770
|
The Sun Fire T2000 1.4 results currently under SPEC review.
Sun Fire
T2000/T1000 server power consumption taken
from measurements made during the benchmark run.
Power is average measured watts during
benchmark run.
IBM 550 power specifications calculated by applying 70% of the Maximum
Wattss published in “Facts and Features Report”, 11/14/06, posted
at
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_sp/n/PSB01628USEN/PSB01628USEN.PDF.
Dell 2950 power rating
estimated by calculating 70% of the power
supply data reported in the product brochure,http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pedge/en/2950_specs.pdf
HP DL585 power consumption
estimated by taking 70% of the maximum
input wattage rating of 1160W reported here on 11/14/06:
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11902_na/11902_na.html#Power%20Specifications
HP DL380G5 power
consumption estimated by taking 70% of the maximum
input wattage rating of 1193W reported here on 11/14/06:
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12477_na/12477_na.html#Power%20Specifications
Benchmark Description
SPECweb2005, is the latest
industry standard benchmark for evaluating Web Server performance
developed by SPEC. The benchmark simulates multiple user sessions
accessing a Web Server and generating static and dynamic HTTP
requests. The major features of SPECweb2005 are:
- Measures simultaneous user sessions
- Dynamic content: currently PHP and JSP implementations
- Page images requested using 2 parallel HTTP connections
- Multiple, standardized workloads: Banking (HTTPS), E-commerce
(HTTP and HTTPS), and Support (HTTP)
- Simulates browser caching effects
- File accesses more accurately simulate today's disk access
patterns
Disclosure Statement:
SPEC, SPECweb reg tm of Standard
Performance Evaluation Corporation.
Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores/1 chip) 16407 SPECweb2005, submitted to SPEC
for review. HP Proliant DL585 G2 (2 cores/4 chips) 20235
SPECweb2005. Dell PowerEdge 2950 (4 cores/2 chips) 16830 SPECweb2005. HP
Proliant DL585 (2 cores/4 chips) 15850 SPECweb2005. HP Proliant
DL585 G2 (2 cores/4 chips) 14964 SPECweb2005. Fujitsu PRIMERGY
RX600 S3 (2 cores/4 chip) 14896 SPECweb2005. Dell PowerEdge 2950
(2 cores/2 chip) 14495 SPECweb2005.
Sun Fire T2000 (8 cores/1 chip) 14001 SPECweb2005. HP Proliant
DL380 G5 (2 cores/2 chips) 13257 SPECweb2005. Sun Fire T1000 (8
cores/1 chip) 10466 SPECweb2005. IBM System p5 550 (2 cores/2
chips 7881 SPECweb2005. Results from www.spec.org as of January 9, 2007.
| Certified Results |
|
16,407 SPECweb2005
|
| Reference Date: |
|
January 9, 2007 |
| Systems: |
|
1 x Sun Fire T2000
|
| Total # Processors: |
|
1 chip / 8 cores/chip (4 threads/core)
|
| GHz Processor: |
|
Sun UltraSPARC T1 1.4 GHz |
| Operating System: |
|
Solaris 10 11/06
|
| Software: |
|
Sun Java[TM] System Web Server 6.1 SP5 64-bit |
| Storage/network: |
|
3 internal 73GB 10K SAS drives
1 PCI-X Sun PCI Dual Fibre Channel 2GB HBA,
1 Sun StorEdge 3510 RAID,
2 Sun StorEdge 3510 JBOD,
3 Sun PCI-E Dual GigE UTP adapters |
I see you fixed the initial typo of 0.222 to 0.022...
Rick Jones: Thanks for the help on fixing th...
You are welcome. I would like to think I am an ev...
Sorry, Rick mostly correct me on HP on subtle poin...