Tuesday Feb 26, 2008
{update} There is a lot of information about MySQL and Sun at http://www.sun.com/mysql
In addition, I've put together a list of several blogs on MySQL performance.
* a very interesting results that compares Solaris Open-source stack (OS, DB, Web, Virtualizaion) on a 1-chip UltraSPARC T2 server and beating a proprietary stack on a 4-chip QC Xeon. Also measured actual watts and costs. Seems real configurations of HP DL580's draw lots of watts:
http://blogs.sun.com/ritu/entry/mysql_benchmark_us_t2_beats
* an ERP result using MySQL with SugarCRM:
http://blogs.sun.com/vanga/entry/scaling_sugarcrm_with_mysql_on
* great information about tuning MySQL on linux and some performance results:
http://blogs.sun.com/allanp/entry/tuning_mysql_on_linux
* nice writeup on InnoDB on SysBench:
http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/entry/tuning_mysql_innodb_for_sysbench
For a For a variety of things on MySQL see:
http://blogs.sun.com/barton808/entry/mysql_done_deal_talking_with
Tuesday Feb 26, 2008
Getting ready to head off for lunch and I took off my blinders and I see
all of the MySQL announcements. There are even several blogs on MySQL performance. Already some very interesting things coming from bringing MySQL into Sun.
* a very interesting results that compares Solaris Open-source stack (OS, DB, Web, Virtualizaion) on a 1-chip UltraSPARC T2 server and beating a proprietary stack on a 4-chip QC Xeon. Also measured actual watts and costs. Seems real configurations of HP DL580's draw lots of watts:
http://blogs.sun.com/ritu/entry/mysql_benchmark_us_t2_beats
* an ERP result using MySQL with SugarCRM:
http://blogs.sun.com/vanga/entry/scaling_sugarcrm_with_mysql_on
* great information about tuning MySQL on linux and some performance results:
http://blogs.sun.com/allanp/entry/tuning_mysql_on_linux
For a For a variety of things on MySQL see:
http://blogs.sun.com/barton808/entry/mysql_done_deal_talking_with
Monday Feb 18, 2008
The Sun Fire X4150 server equipped with 2 Quad-core Intel Xeon processors
obtained World Record x86 single-JVM and x86 2 chip multi-JVM
results on the SPECjbb2005 benchmark. Enhancements to the JVM had a major impact on performance.
The Sun Fire X4150 with 2 Intel X5460 quad-core processors and running Sun
J2SE 1.6.0_05-p achieved x86 2-chip World Record performance
of 303297 SPECjbb2005 bops,
75824 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM on the SPECjbb2005 benchmark for multi-JVM results.
The Sun Fire X4150 with 2 Intel X5460 quad-core processors and running Sun
J2SE 1.6.0_05-p achieved x86 World Record performance
of 277585 SPECjbb2005 bops,
277585 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM for a single JVM
on the SPECjbb2005 benchmark.
Using the same processor, the Sun Fire X4150 with Solaris 10 and
Java HotSpot(TM) 32-Bit Server, beat the results of Dell and Lenovo
which used Windows and BEA JRockit on the multi-JVM test.
The Sun Fire X4150 running the single-JVM SPECjbb2005 test easily
beat all x86 results, topping the Dell R200 by 1.98X, the Fujitsu BX620
by 2.0X and the SGI XE240 by nearly 2.1X.
SPECjbb2005 Performance Chart (ordered by performance, bops: SPECjbb2005 Business Operations per Second (bigger is better), selected results... my best guess at the top ones for the engineers who act like lawyers you can go to www.spec.org to see all results as it clearly states at the bottom.
| System |
Processors |
Performance |
| Chip |
Core |
Thr |
GHz |
Type |
SPEC-
jbb-
2005
bops |
JVMs |
SPEC-
jbb-
2005
bops/JVM |
| Multi-JVM, 2-Chip x86 Results (selected top see note above) |
| Sun Fire X4150 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
3.16 |
X5460 |
303297 |
4 |
75824 |
| Dell PowerEdge 2950 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
3.16 |
X5460 |
303130 |
4 |
75783 |
| Lenovo R515 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
3.16 |
X5460 |
294716 |
4 |
73678 |
| Single-JVM x86 Results (selected top, see note above) |
| Sun Fire X4150 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
3.16 |
X5460 |
277585 |
1 |
277585 |
| Dell PowerEdge R200 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2.66 |
X3230 |
140220 |
1 |
140220 |
| Fujitsu BX620 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3.0 |
5160 |
138388 |
1 |
138388 |
| SGI Altix XE240 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5160 |
134561 |
1 |
134561 |
| Dell PowerEdge 2950 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5160 |
130589 |
1 |
130589 |
Complete benchmark results may be found at the SPEC benchmark website http://www.spec.org.
Benchmark Description
SPECjbb2005 (Java Business Benchmark) measures the performance of a Java implemented application tier (server-side Java). The benchmark is based on the order processing in a wholesale supplier application. The performance of the user tier and the
database tier are not measured in this test. The metrics given are number of SPECjbb2005 bops (Business Operations per Second) and SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM (bops per JVM instance).
Disclosure Statement:
SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation. Results as of 2/8/2008 on www.spec.org.
Sun Fire X4150 (2 chips, 8 cores) 303297 SPECjbb2005 bops,
75824 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM;
Dell PowerEdge 2950 (2 chips, 8 cores) 303130 SPECjbb2005 bops,
75783 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM;
Lenovo R515 (2 chips, 8 cores) 294716 SPECjbb2005 bops,
73678 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM.
SPEC, SPECjbb reg tm of Standard Performance Evaluation
Corporation. Results as of 2/8/2008 on www.spec.org.
Sun Fire X4150 (2 chips, 8 cores) 277585 SPECjbb2005 bops,
277585 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM;
Dell PowerEdge R200 (1 chip, 4 cores) 140220 SPECjbb2005 bops,
140220 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM;
Fujitsu BX620 (2 chips, 4 cores) 138388 SPECjbb2005 bops,
138388 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM;
SGI Altix XE240 (2 chips, 4 cores) 134561 SPECjbb2005 bops,
134561 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM;
Dell PowerEdge 2950 (2 chips, 4 cores) 130589 SPECjbb2005 bops,
130589 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM.
Results Summary
| Reference Date: |
|
Feb 8, 2008 |
| Multi-JVM |
|
303297 SPECjbb2005 bops, 75824 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM |
| Single-JVM |
|
277585 SPECjbb2005 bops, 277585 SPECjbb2005 bops/JVM |
| System: |
|
Sun Fire X4150 |
| Processor: |
|
2 x Intel X5460 3.166 GHz |
| Operating System: |
|
Solaris 10 8/07 |
| JVM: |
|
Java HotSpot(TM) 32-Bit Server, Version 1.6.0_05-p |
Monday Jan 07, 2008
You may have missed this writeup about UltraSparc T2 and Tigerton Tests which looked at low-level memory access measurements: http://blogs.sun.com/psa/entry/ultrasparc_t2_sun
A quote from a Sun employee I like... "You can only compute as fast as you can move data"
Friday Oct 26, 2007
Sun gets two new World Records for scientific desktop performance
on the Sun Ultra 24 (single 3.0 GHz Intel DC Xeon E6850)
and the 64-bit SuSE Linux SLED 10 operating system.
Results obtained from the most current competitive platforms have
been recently posted for two different Mathematica 6 benchmarks:
- The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) Benchmark
- The Independent (Mathematica MMA6.0.nb ) Benchmark
Although both of the Mathematica 6 benchmark test suites
contains 15 test cases these test cases are different
and the two test suites are separate and distinct from each other.
The Ultra 24 beats all results currently listed at both benchmark sites.
The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) benchmark the Ultra 24
beats other current Intel Xeon (Woodcrest) dual core platforms
(3.0 GHz & 2.66 GHz), Intel based Apple MAC desktops. Itanium 2 platforms,
Pentium 4 platforms, and the IBM Power based platforms.
Alternatively, the independent Mathematica MMA6.0 notebook
benchmark the Ultra 24 beats posted results from primarily
current competitive Apple MAC desktops:
MacPro, MacBook, iMac, and Apple Powerbook G4
Results for both benchmark test suites are shown in the Two Tables
below under "Competitive Landscape"
Table 1. The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) Benchmark
Summary results as in the installed Mathematica 6 Data Base.
This is the latest version of Mathematica timing tests.
Overall performance in 15 test calculations (Bigger is better)
The current reference is a machine with a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 processor
| PLATFORM | Score
|
| 1 socket DC 3GHz Intel Xeon DC E6850 SLED 10 SP 1 Ultra 24 |
3.266 |
| 2-socket DC 3GHz Intel Xeon 5160 MS 32-bit |
2.84 |
| 2-socket DC 3.2 GHz Opteron 2224 Ultra 40 M2 64-bit SLED 10 32 GB |
2.736 |
| 2-socket DC 3.2GHz Opteron 2224 Ultra 40 M2 32-bit Windows XP SP2 8GB |
2.45 |
| 2 socket DC 2.66 GHz Intel Xeon 64-bit Apple MAC 10.4.8 |
2.14 |
| 2 socket QC 1.6 GHz Intel Xeon 5310 32-bit Cent OS Linux |
1.88 |
| 2 socket DC 2.5 GHz G5 Apple MAC OS 10.4.8 32-bit |
1.22 |
| 1 socket 2.4 GHz Pent. 4 MS Win XP 32-bit |
1.00 |
The Independent (Mathematica MMA6.0.nb ) Benchmark
Summary results as listed at the independent Mathematica MMA6
http://smc.vnet.net/timings60.html website.
This is the latest version of the "Mathematica MMA" timing tests.
Overall performance in 15 test calculations (Bigger is better)
The current reference machine is one with a 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor.
| PLATFORM | Score
|
| Sun Ultra 24 3.0 GHz DC Intel E6850 8GB SuSE 10 SP 1 |
1.27505 |
| MacPro, 3.0GHz Intel Core2 Duo, 4GB, MacOS 10.4.9 [4] |
1.25404 |
| AMD Athlon 64 FX-74, 3.0GHz Socket F (1207 FX) DSDC, Windows [5] |
1.14464 |
| iMac, 2.33GHz Intel Core2 Duo, 3GB, MacOS 10.4.9 [2] |
1.00338 |
| MacBook Pro, 2.33GHz Intel Core2 Duo, 2 GB RAM, MacOS X 10.4.9 [1] |
1.00105 |
| MacBook, 2GHz Intel Core2 Duo, 2GB, MacOS 10.4.10 [6] |
0.880472 |
Benchmark Description
The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) Benchmark
The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) benchmark is a revised one
that now comes imbedded in the latest release of Mathematica (currently V6.0)
along with a database of results from current hardware vendor platforms.
This benchmark was developed by Schoeller Porter, one of the principlal
developers of Mathematica. He described the benchmark as follows:
This is the standard benchmark suite for Mathematica, initially introduced
in Mathematica 5.1 (as MathematicaMark2004). It includes both workstation
and parallel benchmarks. The parallel benchmark is automatically invoked
when the Parallel Computing Toolkit is loaded
and compute kernels are available.
It is actively developed, and MathematicaMark 6.0 is the current version.
The 15 Task benchmark includes:
Benchmark Name: MathematicaMark6
Full Version Number:6.0.1
Date: September 14, 2007
Benchmark Result: 3.266
Total Time 26.39
Results:
Data Fitting: 1.273
Digits of Pi: 0.488
Discrete Fourier Transform: 0.765
Eigenvalues of a Matrix: 2.059
Elementary Functions: 3.645
Gamma Function: 0.368
Large Integer Multiplication: 0.734
Matrix Arithmetic: 2.798
Matrix Multiplication: 3.062
Matrix Transpose: 1.298
Numerical Integration: 2.017
Polynomial Expansion: 1.352
Random Number Sort: 1.506
Singular Value Decomposition: 2.346
Solving a Linear System: 2.679
Output
Cell Change Times->{3.398799503863311*^9
The Independent (Mathematica MMA6.0.nb ) Benchmark
The Mathematica MMA 6 benchmark is a widely recognized benchmark.
The tasks are representative important scientific
computing desktop activities.
This benchmark was developed by karl.unterkofler@fh-vorarlberg.ac.at
The benchmark consists of 15 tasks.
Disclosure Statement:
Mathematica MMA 6 Scientific Benchmark Sun Fire Ultra 24 score: 1.27505. Mathematica is a reg
tm of Wolfram Research, Inc. results as of 10/23/07 on http://smc.vnet.net/timings60.htmlResults Summary
The Sun Ultra 24 workstation gives the best
desktop scientific computing performance as demonstrated with both
the The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) Benchmark and the
The Independent (Mathematica MMA6.0.nb ) Benchmark.
Both of these 15 task benchmarks consists of operations that are representative
of computing a variety of scientific funtions.
| Reference Date | 23 October 2007 |
| |
| The Wolfram (Mathematica ISV) Benchmark |
| Platform | Sun Ultra 24 Workstation |
| Total Number Processors | 1 |
| Processor/GHz of Workstation | Intel DC E6850/3.0 GHz |
| Memory | 4x2 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms |
| Operating System | 64-bit SUSE SLED 10 SP 1 |
| Graphics | nVidia Quadro FX 1700 framebuffer |
| Disks | 2x146 GB 15K rpm SAS striped |
| Software |
Mathematica 6 (Scientific Application)
Wolfram (ISV) Benchmark |
| Composite Score | 3.266 |
| |
| The Independent (Mathematica MMA6.0.nb ) Benchmark |
| Platform | Sun Ultra 24 Workstation |
| Total Number Processors | 1 |
| Processor/GHz of Workstation | Intel DC E6850/3.0 GHz |
| Memory | 4x2 GB DDR2 667 MHz dimms |
| Operating System | 64-bit SUSE SLED 10 SP 1 |
| Graphics | nVidia Quadro FX 1700 framebuffer |
| Disks | 2x146 GB 15K rpm SAS striped |
| Software |
Mathematica 6 (Scientific Application)
The Independent (Mathematica MMA6.0.nb ) Benchmark |
| Composite Score | 1.27505 |
Wednesday Oct 24, 2007
The Sun Ultra 24 desktop sets a world record in the MCAD market.
The Ultra 24 beats competitive platforms from Dell, IBM, and HP.
The single socket Ultra 24 can use either Intel dual-core and quad-core
processors. The Sun Ultra 24 demonstrates both excellent performance
and $/performance.
Pro/E is leading software MCAD system. Most major MCAE ISV applications have
integration with Pro/E. Pro/E is used in a variety of different disciplines
such as automotive, aircraft, aerospace, marine, oil&gas, earth moving,
biomedical, heavy industry, atomic energy, etc.
Sun supports Pro/E on Opteron-based desktop platforms and Xeon-based platforms.
Pro/E users appreciate Solaris for its maturity, reliability, suberb
maintenanace and comprehensive well developed network features. This is
a benefit for many engineering corporations that have distributed design.
The OCUS V5 benchmark has a 32-bit "Normal" benchmark
and a newer 64-bit "Large Memory" benchmark to show performance on larger new workloads.
The 32-bit "Normal" OCUS V5 benchmark and World Record Ultra 24 Performance
The Sun Ultra 24 (3GHz QC Intel QX6850 Xeon processor, 8GB memory,
an nVidia Quadr0 FX 5600 framebuffer, 2x15K SAS striped drives under 64-bit
Win 2003 SP 2 XP 64-Ed. sets a new MCAD world record running
the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 32-bit "Normal" benchmark
beating all "legitimate" hardware vendors with results currently posted
at the OCUS V5 www.proesite.com benchmark website.
Reruns on the same Ultra 24 platform but with a 3GHz DC Intel
Xeon E6850 processor also with nVidia Quadro FX 5600 produced essentially
identical world record results as obtained in the initial runs with a
with a 3GHz QC E6850 processor.
Further reruns on the same Ultra 24 platform with a 3GHz DC Xeon
E6850 but with an nVidia Quadro FX 1700 produced essentially
identical world record results as obtained in the initial runs with a
3GHz QC QX6850 processor.
These results obtained with Pro/E WF 3 are better than any others posted
at the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 "Normal" benchmark website by "legitimate"
harware vendors.
The top most competition comes from current Dell and HP desktop
platforms both with the recent dual-core 3GHz Woodcrest 5160
Intel processors or the Intel Core2 Duo Extreme processors
The 64-bit "Large Memory" OCUS V5 benchmark and World Record Ultra 24 Performance
-
The Sun Ultra 24 with a 3GHz DC Intel Xeon E6850, 8GB memory,
an nVidia Quadr0 FX 1700 framebuffer, 2x15K SAS striped drives under 64-bit
Win 2003 SP 2 XP 64-Ed. sets a new MCAD world record running
the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" benchmark
-
Reruns on the same Ultra 24 again with a 3GHz DC Intel Xeon E6850
but with the NVidia Quadro FX 5600 framebuffer instead
of the NVidia Quadro FX 1700 also produced essentailly the same
world record results.
-
Further reruns on the same Ultra 24 platform but now with a 3GHz QC Intel
QX6850 processor (same nVidia Quadro FX 5600 framebuffer)
produced essentially identical world record results as obtained
in the initial runs with a 3GHz DC E6850 Xeon and an nVidia Quadro
FX 1700 framebuffer.
-
These results obtained with Pro/E WF 3 are better than any others posted
at the Pro/E Wildfire OCUS benchmark website.
The top most competition comes from current Dell and HP desktop
platforms both equipped with the recent dual core 3GHz Woodcrest 5160
Intel processors or the Intel Core2 Duo Extreme processors
PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 32-bit "NORMAL" BENCHMARK Selected results are
run times in seconds, smaller is better
Ultra 24 vs. Topmost Current Posted Competitive Result
|
|
Time (in seconds) |
|
| Platform |
Processor |
Total |
Graphics |
CPU |
Disk I/O |
OS |
| Ultra 24 |
1x3.0GHz QC Intel QX6850 |
1228 |
664 |
563 |
91 |
Win 64 XP |
| Dell Prec 390 |
1x2.93GHz Intel Core2 X6800 |
1285 |
692 |
591 |
95 |
Win 64 XP |
PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" BENCHMARK
Selected results are
run times in seconds, smaller is better
Ultra 24 vs. Topmost Current Posted Competitive Result
|
|
Time (in seconds) |
|
| Platform |
Processor |
Total |
Graphics |
CPU |
Disk I/O |
OS |
| Ultra 24 |
1x3.0GHz DC Intel E6850 |
2809 |
877 |
1926 |
352 |
Win 64 XP |
| Dell Prec. 490 |
1x3.0GHz DC Intel 5160 |
3026 |
1094 |
1925 |
341 |
Win 64 XP |
For results see OCUS website: http://www.proesite.com
Results Summary
PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 32-bit "NORMAL" BENCHMARK
|
|
| Submitted Results | 32-bit "Normal" OCUS V5 Benchmark |
| Reference Date | 23 October 2007 |
| Platform | Sun Ultra 24 Workstation |
| Total Number Processors | 1 |
| Processor/GHz of Workstation | Intel QC QX6850/3.0 GHz |
| Memory | 4x2 GB DDR2 667MHz dimms |
| Operating System | Win 2003 SP 2 64 Ed. |
| Graphics | nVidia Quadro FX 5600 framebuffer |
| Disks | 2x146 GB 15K rpm SAS striped |
| Software |
Pro/E Wildfire 3 (MCAD Application) |
| OCUS V5 32-bit "Normal" Benchmark |
| Total Elapsed Time | 1228 seconds |
| Total CPU Time | 563 seconds |
| Total Graphics Time | 664 seconds |
| Total Disk I/O Time | 91 seconds |
|
PRO/E WILDFIRE MCAD OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" BENCHMARK
|
|
| Submitted Results | 64-bit OCUS V5 Benchmark |
| Reference Date | 23 October 2007 |
| Platform | Sun Ultra 24 Workstation |
| Total Number Processors | 1 |
| Processor/GHz of Workstation | Intel DC E6850/3.0 GHz |
| Memory | 4x2 GB DDR2 667MHz dimms |
| Operating System | Win 2003 SP 2 64 Ed. |
| Graphics | nVidia Quadro FX 1700 framebuffer |
| Disks | 2x146 GB 15K rpm SAS striped |
| Software |
Pro/E Wildfire 3 (MCAD Application) |
| OCUS V5 64-bit "Large Memory" Benchmark |
| Total Elapsed Time | 2809 seconds |
| Total CPU Time | 1926 seconds |
| Total Graphics Time | 877 seconds |
| Total Disk I/O Time | 352 seconds |
|
Thursday Aug 09, 2007
Postscript:
Be careful when comparing performance results, as an example look at
a comment in yesterday's
"Can I use 64 threads in a chip?" posting. At
least this comment pointed out that you can use 4-8 threads in 2 chip Intel-based systems, but it was really trying to
be a stab at UltraSPARC Performance. Here was the comment:
One really needs to look at the complete data on those .pdf's
to make a fair comparison (also in the disclosure statement
below).
First: The T2000 SAP-SD used a 1.2GHz UltraSPARC T1, Sun now ships faster 1.4GHz UltraSPARC T1, and has announced 1.4GHz UltraSPARC T2. The 1.4GHz T2 has double the threads of that 1.4GHz (double the computational power).
Second: The T2000 SAP-SD result was submitted in Dec 2005, at that time it
was near the performance of the expensive 4-way POWER5 IBM p550.
Third: The 2-chip Dual-core Xeon SAP-SD result above was
submitted 18 months after the T2000 SAP-SD result.
Fourth: Different versions of the benchmark. The 2-chip
Dual-core Xeon was run with ECC 6.0 (not SAP 5.0). The a newer version
of the benchmark takes more computational work to produce the same results.
Dual-core SAP-SD result was also run with Solaris 10 on Xeon, how cool is that!
Fifth: The 2-chip quad-core Xeon SAP-SD result above was
submitted 19 months after the T2000 SAP-SD result.
Sixth: The Sun result used open-source MySQL MaxDB database,
how cool is that! The Xeon results used Oracle or MicroSoft SQL Server.
postscript:
Sun latter used Oracle, others suggested US T1 has some sort of silly database limitation - NOT TRUE!
You'll see more results soon.
Triffids, as a reminder if you work for a partner company of SAP you must
put the following disclosures when you post results. If you are not
they you don't need to put this in, but as you can see the data in
it would have allowed you to make a better comparison of systems.
Don't worry I'm not asking you to identify yourself at all.
Disclosure Statement:
Two-tier SAP ECC 5.0 Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) benchmark Sun Fire T2000 (1-way, 1 proc, 8 cores, 32 threads) 1x 1.2 GHz UltraSPARC T1, 32 GB mem, 950 SD benchmark users, 1.91 sec avg response time, Cert#2005047., MaxDB 7.5 database, Solaris 10; Two-tier SAP ECC 5.0 Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) benchmark IBM System eServer p5 550 (4-way, 4 procs, 4 cores, 8 threads) 4x 1.9 GHz POWER5+, 32GB mem, 1,000 SD benchmark users, 1.97s avg resp time, Cert#2005040, IBM DB2 Universal Database 8.2.2, SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9;
Two-tier SAP ECC 6.0 Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) benchmark Fujitsu Siemens Computers PRIMERGY Model BFi20 S2 (2 procs, 4 cores, 4 threads) 2x Intel Xeon 5160, 3.0 GHz, 16GB mem, 1,020 SD benchmark users, 1.94s avg resp time, Cert#2007031, Oracle 10g, Solaris 10;
Two-tier SAP ECC 6.0 Standard Sales and Distribution (SD) benchmark Fujitsu Siemens Computers PRIMERGY Model TX300 S3 (2 procs, 8 cores, 8 threads) 4x Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor X5355 2.66 GHz, 32GB mem, 1865 SD benchmark users, 1.99s avg resp time, Cert#2007025, SQL Server 2005, Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition; SAP, R/3, mySAP reg TM of SAP AG in Germany and other countries. More info www.sap.com/benchmark.
I edited in:
2 processors into Quad-Core Intel Xeon Processor X5355 2.66 GHz
...and..
32 threads to the Sun Fire T2000, 1 processor / 8 cores
...in order to make the comparisons more consistent.
|
|
|
|
I pity the engineer who had to sit there running S...
I guess you also pity athletes who beat world reco...
Clearly, this isn't about running jbb over and ove...
Did you hack the BIOS?
That is just an outright lie! The Sun result cont...
I don't pity athletes who barely break records bec...
Ok, made a mistake (not a lie, get a life). But a...