Musings from within

SunIT Data Center Consolidation

Thursday Jan 10, 2008

SunIT's Data Center Consolidation Efforts


Sun IT is driving towards a consolidated and unified data center approach by 2015, while reducing overall operating costs, overall energy consumptions, and to eliminate all SunIT data center's. Did I just say 0 data centers? Yes! Our goal is to reduce our entire data center presence by 2015.


Immediate question is... What definition of Data Center are you using? Well the definition I have been using is from Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA), specifically TIA-942.


SunIT's 2013 Data Center targets will be to consolidate:


  • 50% of SunIT's Data Center square footage

  • 50% or more of total SunIT Data Center BTU's consumed

  • 50% or more of total SunIT Data Center Power consumed


SunIT's 2015 Data Center goals will be:


  • 0 SunIT Data Center's


Vision:


SunIT will move in an evolutionary manor from several generations of infrastructure, both technology and processes, to a model that is far more efficient with enabling factors like technology and IT Governance like processes. As SunIT reduces data centers due to higher utilization functionality, there will be a point proven by metrics, that SunIT can only become so efficient. At that point SunIT must progress from a service oriented architecture to more of a software as a service.

I will attempt to show in later blogs the benefits of becoming more efficient but with hard numbers. Also I will show in other blogs how SunIT can reach a level of efficiencies that will get us to our 2013 goal, but that 2015 goal will require some greater efforts. Specifically around the potential of a Software as a Service (SaaS) model.


Why do this?


  • Reduced IT costs thanks to a major reduction in data center space, power, and cooling requirements.

  • Reduced IT costs and decreased time to implement projects thanks to a reduction in operations complexity for the data center staff.

  • Compliance with Data Center audit finding.

  • A foundation for sourcing components.

  • A transition to an “evolutionary change” infrastructure management style.

  • Alignment with application, security, business systems, and agent architectures.


How do we plan on getting to the 2013 goal?


There is an ample amount of technologies available to SunIT that will allow us to consolidate systems, storage, applications, etc.


  • Server Virtualization – Xen/xVM, Solaris Zones/LDOMS

  • Storage Consolidation – Tiered storage, NAS, etc

  • Application Consolidation – For SunIT its called IBIS

  • WAN acceleration – Another interesting technology in which its roots have been around for a while.

  • SaaS - Another blog but SaaS plays a huge role. SaaS and mashups are an interesting discussion


Currently SunIT uses Zones and LDOMS, I am implying that these solutions are enabling technologies to allow SunIT to achieve our goal of 0 data centers by 2015. The above bullet items are a simplified and I mean simplified view of IT efficiencies from a technology standpoint. There is then the evolutionary change in process and procedures that becomes a challenge. This introduction blog is to show folks that SunIT is actively doing data center consolidations and we do have strategies going out to 2015.


I will follow up with some more detailed blogs about our efforts, supporting technologies, SaaS industry, EDI vs Mashups, and many more.....


As always you can contact me direct at brian dot cinque at sun dot com




[27] Comments
Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg
Comments:

[Trackback] A data center architect at Sun Microsystems (JAVA) says the company intends to "eliminate all SunIT data centers" by 2015.

Posted by Data Center Knowledge on January 10, 2008 at 05:18 PM EST #

Brian, can you elaborate on what you mean by SunIT moving from a SOA to a SaaS architecture? In your opinion, why are they not complimentary ?

Posted by Nihar Mehta on January 10, 2008 at 07:32 PM EST #

Do you include Engineering Labs in this target?

Posted by James McPherson on January 11, 2008 at 01:52 AM EST #

[Trackback] In an ironic twist, some of today's leading manufacturers of server computers are also among the companies moving most aggressively to reduce their need for servers and other hardware components. Hewlett-Packard, for instance, is in the midst of a proj...

Posted by Rough Type: Nicholas Carr's Blog on January 11, 2008 at 10:50 AM EST #

It seems like this would be a natural place to mention network.com. If Sun's goal is to shuffle off all of its internal data center infrastructure in order to improve efficiency, it seems reasonable to mention the potential drawbacks of moving to SOA and eventually SaaS. Especially for Sun, which must sell itself as being expert in both building and operating server infrastructure, losing the internal knowledge and experience of running your own data centers seems like a great loss of technical credibility. You've got to eat your own dog food. Unless, that is, you plan on making heavy use of (or, more convincingly, exclusively use) Sun's network.com and transferring many of your SunIT assets to network.com. Why didn't you mention this?

Posted by Rob Ellis on January 11, 2008 at 12:38 PM EST #

There are some tough questions here. Sun largely uses Sun Rays internally. Where will the back-end servers for those desktop appliances go? Or is the plan to go back to full desktop systems for everyone? (That seems a bit of a step backwards to me.)

The other question is that what will happen to our engineering systems/servers? Big systems like Jurassic, the ONNV build machines, etc. must be taken into account. I don't think it is sensible to fully eliminate such systems (and they need a data center), at least not if Sun is to continue doing its own engineering.

I fully applaud the idea that Sun can eliminate a lot of the large systems that it uses for business purposes, but the R&D, and general purpose machines (Sun Ray servers) are not going to be so easy to eliminate.

Posted by Garrett D'Amore on January 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM EST #

If the IT infrastructure is being reduced by 50% on its way to zero, then by complement the role of the CIO may be reduced by the same amount. There have been several reports that the CIO function is essentially dead and will be gone by 2012 or 2015. What do these architecture moves mean forthe role of the CIO within SUN and how to they advocate the role shift within their client base? Hummm...

Posted by Terry Retter on January 11, 2008 at 03:04 PM EST #

[Trackback] An intriguing blog post by Brian Cinque at Sun announces -- and hazily outlines -- the company's vision to consolidate its datacenters out of existence by 2015. The great migration to nothing will be evolutionary, Cinque writes, noting that Sun's IT in...

Posted by Tech Watch | InfoWorld Staff on January 11, 2008 at 05:49 PM EST #

Maybe I am missing something here, but if there are zero data centres, where is the computing power going to be? Are Sun going to outsource?

Bit of a weak post, and I look forward to followup.

Posted by Colin Henderson on January 12, 2008 at 03:04 AM EST #

Is SunIT probably thinking in an outsourcing?.

Posted by Robert Young on January 12, 2008 at 12:37 PM EST #

Way to go SUN!
But I simply don't get it.
This reminds me of the mess that programming languages create with peculiar syntaxes and partial or partisan support for some programming features over others.
Like for instance, in one context, global variables look great.
But, in the very next context, local variables look poor.
Then the situation reverses.
All because of bad syn tax system.

So essentially, if a local variable enters a global scope with only local permissions or worse, global permissions, then either the data in it can get messed up, or maybe it triggers a global mess, troubling the system.
All in all, mixing scope like this is bad.
You would wonder what that has to do with your Utility versus DataCenter approach.
I would like to draw a parallel like this:
local variable = utility
global = Data center
or maybe, if all-so-mighty powerful SUN decides so,
local = Data center
global = utility (network computer)

These super-quick rollouts will have to be really without rollbacks. That's the key, key thing here.
Then the issue of all-mighty data and security promised(duh!)

For SMEs like me, this goes all over the top, frankly.
Both in understanding and eventual implementation.

Posted by Jerry Bard on January 13, 2008 at 01:04 PM EST #

you're confusing some people ....

Posted by anon on January 13, 2008 at 06:38 PM EST #

I bet the outsourced data centers will be running Windows!

Posted by Bill Gates on January 13, 2008 at 09:31 PM EST #

Help, do something!!!
ElReg has made an ugly hatred out of it, and your blog entry's ambiguity really provoked reactions like this, and has made it easy for them:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/12/sun_no_data_centers_2015/

Posted by Martin Bochnig on January 14, 2008 at 01:16 AM EST #

Is this half-baked plan/news something you should post in a public blog.
Moron!

Posted by shetan on January 14, 2008 at 02:06 PM EST #

This is not a new idea, only an attempt to save money, all persons that have been through tech downsizing plans know complex systems that handle complex data require knowledge to support them and write programs that maintain operating systems and applications. Knowledge is not cheap no matter what country your dealing with. I drive my car with an understanding that under the hood is a complex engine with sensors that actively adjust to anything that happens, but I have to have skilled mechanic, not just to change my tires but to check my engine and recommend either from experience or a tech database with fixes if I need them. Dell and Starbucks CEO founders know that quality starts within.

Posted by Lex on January 14, 2008 at 03:18 PM EST #

with this little detail, I could lay out a plan for zero energy consumption for the US by 2010

Posted by 192.18.128.5 on January 14, 2008 at 03:22 PM EST #

Need to know what is the meaning of zero Data Center by 2015...?how exactly this would be achieved.

Posted by Pratik on January 14, 2008 at 11:37 PM EST #

I would like to understand what efficencies you hope to gain by not owning DC?

I appreciate that you want to consolidate app footprint and use virtualisation techniques, and this is sensible and makes most of the server and network asset, but this is as easily achieved in-house as it is out-of-house. A server or network will burn as much power in a Sun DC as it will in a 3rd party DC and it will take an equal amount of cooling. Therefore your focus should surely be on consolidation/virtualisation and the SAAS element.

Moving your power footprint out of Sun DC and claiming savings of 50% power draw and BTU is surely false accounting on a like for like basis?

That is unless you are deliberately closing your own DC to move to green DC? Could we get some insight into your third parties plans on next gen power and cooling?

Posted by interested but not convinced on January 15, 2008 at 10:45 AM EST #

[Trackback] A notícia mais importante para a área de Segurança da Informação nos últimos dias na verdade não tem

Posted by Segurança na Microsoft on January 16, 2008 at 06:11 AM EST #

[Trackback] CEO Jonathan Schwartz: "We will have data centers at Sun for a long time into the future."

Posted by Data Center Knowledge on February 14, 2008 at 03:34 PM EST #

Make sure your data center furniture fits your budget. The new server racks and data cabinets on the market these days are very inexpensive. There are many places to buy online. I found the quality and value of the network support furniture you can get to be above my expectations. Make sure you ask about the quality before you buy. Check out the data server racks if you get the opportunity.

Posted by Data Racks on February 25, 2008 at 01:52 AM EST #

[Trackback] I just stumbled upon a curious headline “Sun Plans To Close Its Data Centers” describing a post by Brian Cinque. Brian’s post was about Sun’s aggressive work within SunIT to reduce data center costs, including power and cooling ...

Posted by Inchoate Curmudgeon on March 27, 2008 at 12:55 PM EDT #

There are certainly a lot of questions raised when considering <a href=http://www.stratavia.com/datacenterconsolidation.php>data center consolidation</a> but ultimately the time and money saved justify the process if one can find no other good in the process. As far as IT professionals losing jobs, consolidation will not cause that as there will always be a need for good IT people.

Posted by Brad on May 25, 2008 at 05:31 PM EDT #

[Trackback] In a new blog , Sun Microsystems data center architect Brian Cinque discusses how the company plans to reduce its data center footprint to zero by 2015. He says it will cut its data center square footage in half by 2013, then spend two years shiftin...

Posted by Infrastructure on February 02, 2009 at 03:43 PM EST #

you are confused me.

Posted by Computer support on April 18, 2009 at 03:31 AM EDT #

The Solaris 10 03/05 Certified software consists of the Solaris 10 03/05 Operating Environment and a subset of Solaris 10 patches which have been reviewed to ensure that their application introduces no new security vulnerabilities.
http://www.watchrolexshop.com
http://www.gamegoldme.com
http://www.cheap-lotrogold.com
http://www.globalsale.me/Aion-gold-083.aspx
http://www.cheap-gamegold.org
http://www.gamegoldvip.org

Posted by aion gold on June 25, 2009 at 01:40 AM EDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed