Monday March 31, 2008 | Last week
InfoWorld posted a very positive review
of the Sun SPARC Enterprise
T5120,
featuring the UltraSPARC T2 processor.
The server scored 8.3 out
of 10, a rating of "very good." The in-depth review discusses the new features that differentiate the T5120 from previous SPARC servers. The reviewer, Paul Venezia, discusses why the T2 processor is significant, stating, "this architecture is a significant departure from the rest of the industry, and positions these servers to fill specific, highly transactional roles, foregoing the rest. In that capacity, they do quite well." |
| Mario
Apicella's InfoWorld review
of the Sun
StorageTek 5800 posted today, and we did extremely well, scoring a
9.3 out of 10, or "Excellent" rating. Mario highlighted many of the ST5800's features, including its ability to quickly and automatically replace a failed master node with another node; its simplified administrative interface; and its storage management software commands that "are both intuitive and very powerful." Mario goes on to say, "How Honeycomb stores objects is one of the secrets to its reliability and persistence ... Having objects spread across multiple nodes and spindles also favors fast performance and quick rebuilds after failure." He included all performance tests he ran on the ST5800, including one where he abruptly pulled drives, shut down two nodes and killed one of the switches to trigger fail-over to the standby unit -- "In every case, the ST5800 kept on ticking and returned quickly to normal status when the failure was removed." |
![]() |
| InfoWorld
reviewer Mario Apicella recently conducted a 3-day onsite evaluation of
the Sun
StorageTek 5800 System. We are expecting his full review in the
near future. In the interim, he posted
a blog on his evaluation this week, and mentioned that he "abruptly
pulled out eight of its 64 drives, Honeycomb survived without losing
data. No RAID system can compete with that." |
![]() (Image courtesy: Scott Camazine) |
| ZDNet's
Paul Murphy continues
to examines our forthcoming
Rock hardware and
compares it to Intel, Windows and the x86 infrastructure. According to him, "Sun's Rock is pretty cool hardware too -- a machine with the potential to side step the scaling issues that have traditionally limited SMP system expansion. As I understand it, the Rock hardware is sufficiently backward compatible that existing Solaris binaries for SPARC work -- but the big potential gains won't be realized without significant kernel, library, and application simplification ... If Linux continues to evolve as everyone's preferred solution for grid computing and IBM shifts much of the focus there to PPC and Cell -- while Sun rocks the SMP world with highly scalable solutions built on Solaris, then where does all that leave Windows and x86?" Where else? In the dust!!! ![]() |
|
| PC Magazine
has posted a very positive review
on the Sun Fire X4150
server as side
bar to a round up review of other SMB-focused x64 servers. The review praises the powerful features and functions that are included in such a small box -- stating that "Sun has kept its new Sun Fire in a 1U enclosure but has sacrificed absolutely nothing in the way of hardware or management features, building a box capable of competing with servers twice its size." |
)| InformationWeek
has an interesting article
on data compliance in this week's print
issue. Due to government regulations and internal policies, organizations need to retain data and be able to track and verify that this data has not been modified or deleted. This is particularly important in the finance and health-care industries. The InformationWeek article by Howard Marks focused on fixed content storage solutions that allow IT to store file data in a form that prevents end-users from modifying the data. This is where WORM (Write Once, Read Many) tapes come in play. Per Howard, "All popular tape formats, from LTO in the midrange to Sun Microsystems' T10000 at the high end, have firmware in the drive that identifies special WORM cartridges, and once data is written to them, prevents overwriting or erasure. With capacities of 800 GB per cartridge, WORM tape, especially if used behind a RAID cache, is the lowest-cost, and greenest, solution for very large archives where IT can deal with file access times measured in minutes. RAID, or even MAID, uses power when not being accessed." |
![]() |

| ZDNet's
Paul Murphy discusses
two CPU features
-- thread scouting and
transactional memory -- only found in our forthcoming
Rock chip. His
blog post notes, "The most obvious implication here is that
Rock and
its successors will allow Solaris kernel developers to make most these
lock processes go away - and for applications that will initially mean
simple re-compiles to take advantage of new libraries but in the longer
term spark new designs eliminating many of the cycle absorbing
complexities of present day multi-threading." An interesting read. |
|
| Octave
Orgeron, Sparks and White Noise blogger and contributor to various
USENIX publications, today published
his full review of the T5120
and
T5520 servers. Titled "The SPARC Enterprise T5120 and T5220," Octave opens the review by explaining that these products represent a huge advancement in server technology for SPARC customers and calls the servers "amazing." Octave explains that the UltraSPARC T2 processor is the second generation of the CMT processor design from Sun and notes that the processor is really a "system on a chip." Its built-in components, explains Octave, allow for higher throughput and reduced I/O overhead that would normally require external ASICs or option cards. |
| Two glowing
reviews of Sun Ultra 24
Workstation have appeared since I wrote
two
days ago about the availability of this new Intel-based workstation. InfoWorld's Paul Venezia examined the new workstation and ran a slew of tests. Sun Ultra 24 came out with flying colors on each occasion. According to Paul, "At first blush, I figured the Ultra 24 to be just another small, workstation-class system that would be good for those who need a little extra horsepower from time to time, but aren't running high-end apps that need a full-blown workstation. After putting it through its paces, I'm thinking that it just might fit both bills. Don't let the size and single-CPU nature of the Ultra 24 fool you -- there's a lot of power in that little box." eWEEK's Frank Ohlhorst also put the Ultra 24 workstation through it paces, and he is extremely positive as well with what he found. According to Frank, "Sun undoubtedly has a winner with the Ultra 24 series of workstations, and other vendors will be hard-pressed to outperform it. What's more, the Ultra 24 proves that quality is still a valuable asset when it comes to workstations. The unit is built like a tank, yet offers toolless access to components. The company has successfully balanced quality with ease of service, while still offering unquestionable performance." |
| CRN posted
a positive review
of the Ultra
20 M2, highlighting it as a solid workstation that combines 64-bit
and 32-bit applications into one box. The reviewer, Fahmida Rashid, points out that the
workstation comes installed with Solaris
10, but support several OS environments with ease. At one
point, she configured the machine to run as a triple boot system with
Solaris 10, Windows XP Professional, and Ubuntu Linux, running without
any difficulty -- making the "Ultra 20 M2 a great
workstation for technical experts and developers." Fahmida was particularly impressed with the design of the machine, calling out its simplicity and open space that make it an ideal unit for swappable components and cooling efficiency. Overall, the review was a very strong testament to the Ultra 20 M2's capabilities. Fahmida wraps up by stating that the AMD-based workstation is a welcome change from competitive machines and is "an attractive offering" where the price is right, and it comes with full support. |
![]() |
Today InfoWorld featured a very positive review of the Sun Blade 6000, awarding it a score of 8.5 ("Very Good" out of 10. The reviewer, Paul Venezia, evaluated
the Sun
Blade 8000 system last year and notes that the newer, scaled-down
6000
series "offers the greatest range of
any blade chassis essentially
because you can mix and match dual-socket Intel, AMD and single-socket
SPARC-based blades in the same chassis."Paul begins his review by detailing his extensive testing environment (a Sun Blade 6000 chassis with six blades, two Network Express Module and four dual-gigabit Express Modules, working with a variety of operating systems) and points out that JavaRConsole, is "simply stellar" and "works flawlessly." With regards to performance, he mentions he had a bad X6220 Opteron blade in the initial product shipment, but Sun worked to send him a replacement that worked just fine. Overall, Paul's testing across three blade architectures showed "solid performance at every level," and he claims that the quad-core Intel Xeon-based blades are "obviously perfect for virtualization." While he'd like to see a refresh of the Sun blades with AMD's Barcelona and Intel's Harpertown-based Stoakley platform, he claims that "as far as what's available today, the price/performance mix delivered by the Sun Blade 6000 is outstanding." Overall, a very positive review of the new Sun Blade 6000. |
![]() |