Mittwoch Mai 25, 2005
A standard based on standards "OpenDocument provides a single XML schema for text, spreadsheets, charts, and graphical documents. It makes use of existing standards, such as HTML, SVG, XSL, SMIL, XLink, XForms, MathML, and the Dublin Core, wherever possible. OpenDocument has been designed as a package concept, enabling it to be used as a default file format for office applications with no increase in file size or loss of data integrity."
The full article can be found here.
( Mai 25 2005, 10:21:02 AM CEST )
Permalink
"OO.o 2.0 pioneers new standard" "The new standard format promises greater compatibility between all office productivity applications in the future, according to author Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols. "It's designed to not tie businesses' data to a particular program or version of a program," Vaughan-Nichols writes.
The Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) has already won the endorsements of Sun, IBM, and Red Hat according to Vaughan-Nichols. Also, there are predictions that it will find a solid niche in both government and private sectors."
The full article can be found here.
( Mai 25 2005, 10:19:14 AM CEST )
Permalink
Becoming rich without an MBA Based on the following comments to my last MBA related blog posting I did a little research:
"Go to the home page of a top VC, for instance Sutter Hill Ventures (www.shv.com), and see where they got their degrees. Can you see a pattern?"
"the best talent and the most money clusters around relatively few institutions"
Although I believe that institutions like Harvard and Stanford "produce" a lot of successful business men, I also strongly believe that there are other ways to be equally successful.
BTW, how is success actually measured? Is it the size of the salary, the title, the money-earned-per-hours-worked ratio, or simply the level of contentment and satisfaction? Many people want to be CEO's. However, although I'm pretty ambitious I don't see that as the highest level of success. I'm not sure if people are happier if they don't see their families anymore because they are constantly flying around the world to close deals.
Nevertheless, I took a look at the list of the richest people in the world. To my surprise (if I did not make a mistake), most people don't have an MBA from a top institution. Actually, they don't have an MBA at all.
Quite a few of these people also did not inherit a fortune, but created it themselves. A few examples that I identified are Bill Gates, Paul Allen, Larry Ellison, Sam Walton, as well as Karl and Theo Albrecht.
Apparently, Sam Walton (Wal-Mart) and the Albrechts (ALDI, Trader Joe's) started the businesses from scratch with not a lot of money in their pocket. Bill Gates and Paul Allen decided to drop out of college to start their software business. And Larry Ellison seemed to have a rough start, too:
"He enrolled at the University of Chicago the following fall, but dropped out after the first semester. his father was now convinced he would never make anything of himself, but Ellison had learned the rudiments of computer programming in Chicago and took this skill with him to Berkeley, California, arriving with just enough money for fast food and a few tanks of gas.
For the next eight years he bounced from job to job, working as a technician for Fireman's Fund, Wells Fargo bank and began working as a programmer with large databases at Ampex. At Ampex he built a large database for the CIA, code name: Oracle."
Probably these are extraordinary people, and also most likely top business schools can help to accelerate the career. However, it looks to me that there are other ways to become successful. I doubt that all the European, Asian and African CEO's and VP's went to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, and INSEAD!
Thus, if the people network is key, like some people indicated in their comments, there must be other ways to build up or access such a network. If it is the MBA knowledge, like others suggested, there must be other ways to access the knowledge.
As usual, I'm curious to see and read your comments!
( Mai 25 2005, 07:56:17 AM CEST )
Permalink
Looking for OpenOffice.org/StarOffice ISV's Here in my blog I already introduced a few third party solutions that are available (or at least under development) for StarOffice. A few solutions are also listed on the OpenOffice.org development page. However, I'm sure this does not provide the full picture!
Therefore, please let me know if you have developed a solution on top of StarOffice and OpenOffice.org. Also, if you want to start integrating your product with OpenOffice.org or StarOffice, please contact me or the OpenOffice.org BizDev Project, so that we can check how we can help you with your effort.
Finally, the next OpenOffice.org Conference is coming up. If you are selling StarOffice or OpenOffice.org-based products, it would be great if you could support this event! Even Microsoft was there last year!
( Mai 25 2005, 06:13:04 AM CEST )
Permalink
NetBeans Interview with Gosling and Cramer "Cramer: The big key feature is J2EE 1.4 development, and working on there the ability to work on EJBs for mere human beings. What took so long? I know, I know. EJBs are complicated, so we spent a lot of time with the EJB team and the tool team together and worked very hard to make EJB development a lot easier."
The full interview can be found here.
( Mai 25 2005, 06:03:42 AM CEST )
Permalink
|