 |
NET2Java
translates applications written either in Visual Basic or in C#, 2003
or 2005 editions.
|
 |
 |
Ya,
that much source code. |
 |
 |
NET2Java
creates readable Java source
code; e.g. it preserves class names, method names and code comments. |
 |
 |
Because
your applications don't stand still, they will evolve. |
 |
 |
NET2Java uses the NET2Java Library to translate
.NET API calls into Java
Platform API calls. |
 |
 |
Because
.NET programs usually make lots of .NET platform API calls. |
 |
 |
NET2Java doesn't sweat it when it encounters an
unknown API call: it flags it for later and keeps on translating. |
 |
 |
Because
many of your .NET applications use custom components that I've never
heard of. |
 |
 |
NET2Java
includes the NET2Java NetBeans Plugin to let you 'import' a .NET
project into a NetBeans project. |
 |
 |
Because
I *heart* NetBeans. |
 |
 |
NET2Java
includes some homemade .NET samples for you to try translating. |
 |
 |
Because
the best way to understand it is to try it. |
 |
 |
I've
filled the NET2Java Library with enough translations to translate the
samples, and a little more. |
 |
 |
Because
I haven't had time to fill up the NET2Java Library myself. |
 |
 |
The NET2Java Library Editor makes it super
easy to add translations to the NET2Java Library. |
 |
 |
Because
I want to make it easy for us to team together to fill up the NET2Java
Library with a translation for every .NET API call. |
 |
 |
I've
had a lot of fun creating NET2Java. |
 |
 |
And
I think you might have fun too. |
 |
 |
If
you're interested in NET2Java, come help !
|
 |
 |
Because
together we can translate all the .NET applications. |
 |
Posted by Dalibor Topic on May 08, 2006 at 01:36 PM PDT #
http://www.wackylabs.net/flickr/flickr-api/
I'd love to know how it fares against that. I *love* Java and I'd love to get away from .net wherever possible, but I'm not going to install netbeans to try it out. :( cmdline please.
Personally I'm not at all interested in VB code migration. Those who choose to implement in VB usually have strong misgivings against C# or Java. And I'm not at all interested in the System.Forms.* stuff either. I don't know how the rest of your userbase feels but you should probably send out a questionaire or have something on the download page asking which features are important and unimportant to people. You may find that you needn't really work on feature X because no one needs/wants that functionality.
Just my thoughts.
Posted by jeremiah johnson on May 09, 2006 at 03:22 AM PDT #
Posted by Surya on May 09, 2006 at 10:27 AM PDT #
Posted by Surya on May 09, 2006 at 10:31 AM PDT #
Most people I know who try to sell me on Netbeans rattle off all these features that they think Eclipse doesn't have, but that Eclipse actually does have. You Sun people know more about Netbeans than anyone I know, so I'm sure you guys can give me lots of features that don't exist in Eclipse, but because I don't use J2EE, I don't need most (if any) of those features.
Eclipse works /perfectly/ for me. I'm not going to change anytime soon.
Posted by jeremiah johnson on May 09, 2006 at 08:18 PM PDT #
Posted by Surya on May 10, 2006 at 12:38 AM PDT #
Posted by 80.230.85.146 on October 13, 2006 at 06:05 AM PDT #
Posted by Ironic on April 03, 2007 at 09:57 AM PDT #
Posted by vinay kumar on April 27, 2007 at 01:46 AM PDT #