Friday August 03, 2007 Until about a year ago I had been using good old xterm, (I used it under at least olwm,olvwm,twm,tvtwm,ctwm,fvwm,CDE,GNOME). I switch to using gnome-terminal since it appeared to be good enough, it was the default under GNOME (by current desktop of choice) and it had a few features I really liked (though some I sorely missed from xterm too).
So why is it welcome back xterm ? Basically it is the performance. I use Sun Ray most of the time now, and Sun Ray at home over a 1Mbps ADSL line is perfectly usable providing I use xterm and not gnome-terminal.
I should also say that my xterm config isn't default and it is customised so that the Sun keyboard Copy/Paste keys work
The only think I'm really missing from gnome-terminal now I've switched back to xterm is the ability to change which profile (colour basically) a given window is in while it is running ( Aug 03 2007, 03:13:28 PM BST ) Permalink Comments [9]
dtterm takes about 6M a pop (lots of that is shared). Gnome terminal has a way of quickly ballooning up to 150M+.
One last thing is that when one instance dies, they all die. Nothing like having 20 terminal windows all go down at the same time.
Posted by John on August 03, 2007 at 03:44 PM BST #
Posted by Volker A. Brandt on August 03, 2007 at 04:00 PM BST #
Posted by sickness on August 03, 2007 at 04:23 PM BST #
Posted by 192.18.1.36 on August 03, 2007 at 04:59 PM BST #
xterm*VT100.Translations: #override \n\ <Key>Prior: scroll-back(1, page) \n\ <Key>Next : scroll-forw(1, page) \nThis usually goes into the .Xdefaults file.Posted by Volker A. Brandt on August 03, 2007 at 05:21 PM BST #
Posted by Nico on August 03, 2007 at 05:26 PM BST #
Posted by Nico on August 03, 2007 at 05:28 PM BST #
Posted by benr on August 03, 2007 at 08:23 PM BST #
Posted by sickness on August 06, 2007 at 12:54 AM BST #