Translating this into something that I'm passionate about, Utility Computing, may mean that the revenue that utility providers should be chasing might not come from the “block buster hits” = the applications that people fund having built today, but rather from the 80% of applications not yet invented because the communities that they would benefit are so small that today's assembly techniques prevent their development (from a revenue/margin justified business position). Today, because of Utility Computing providers (pay-as-you-drink), productivity enhancing languages like Ruby, and dynamic application assembly techniques (“mashup” seems to be the word de vogue), perhaps UC should be banking on some of the enabling technologies to broaden the field of available applications... something unique for everyone vs. one size fits all.
Permalink
Trackback:

http://blogs.sun.com/dhushon/entry/the_long_tail_of_web