Monday Apr 21, 2008
Monday Apr 21, 2008
From time to time, I find an appreciation in the good, and the comedy in the misinterpreted attempts we make to become better. There is contrast, there is opportunity, there is immense possibility, if we can become the change we want to see in the world. The interesting mix of Sun Tzu for success and ITIL for strategy could make for a fine Inspired ITIL Practice.
Now is the perfect time to embrace our capabilities, instead of celebrating our defense. Recent observations of how to become our best IT Selves:
1. "Showing" our value versus "delivering" solutions requires 2 very different mindsets. Fear is overutilized as a tool for leveraging change in IT. IF the organization is feeling and acting complete at all points of delivery, the state is strong. If the organization is defectively defensive, they will be showing their value by misinformation, half truths, or ignorance of the opportunity. There IS opportunity in anything well worth doing.
QUESTION: What ITIL PRACTICE has us producing half measures that weaken our effectiveness?
2. Don't tell me or fail to tell me, let us create our united purpose through deliberate, open and superior communications instead of defensive, impractical "reality television" elimination routines. We will create value, because suddenly our work is again about seeking that which allows us to empowered to inspire, to create, to deliver.
QUESTION: Where has ITIL Management Weakness moved us to producing metrics that defend, rather than move our business?
3. Taking the leadership initiative requires we embrace the circumstances which insure victory. Knowing our enemy and knowing ourself, requires an ability to look, listen, and assess what is real opportunity, and what level of alignment will help us to recognize that better state. Let us stop using language, inference, metrics, organizations, or excuses as a weapon, to embrace our larger purpose. Because it's always been done. Because we do x practice and yours sounds like y. A presumption of innocence or guilt, superiority, or weakness, unvalidated by statistics and good intelligence, practical strategy, with sound flexibility, creates a fair and harmonious relationship rooted in knowing the ground, knowing the advantage, and the terrain.
QUESTION: What levels of performance must be working to meet the needs of our next business cycle? How will we know we are successful? How will we know if the data is complete enough to be adequate?
You are making good observations and asking good questions. However, I am having trouble with how you intend for the reader to interpret:
“A presumption of innocence or guilt,
… and the terrain.”
I’m taking you to task on this grammar, my dear!
It looks like you are searching for a balance between risk mitigation (defensive and protective measures) and risk taking (value creation, opportunities).
“fear is over utilized as a tool for leveraging change in IT”
I have long suspected this to be true and have only occasionally come across something published that validates that premise over the past twenty years.
Presumably you have resources you can point to that validate this observation.
I would add that fear is an ineffective tool for leveraging change in IT.
It is good to root out ineffective methods and measures. Good questions.
Posted by Carolyn on April 26, 2008 at 07:41 AM EST #
Carolyn, thank you for your thoughtful comments. Yep in retrospect my grammar should be taken to task, and I appreciate your taking the time to do so.
A great support organization might not let you see externally, the problems or chinks, however that same great support organzation cares too much about delivering value not to have those really practical discussions about how to move the business to deliver competitive value.
I agree, fear is an ineffective tool at managing long term change, while it does get short term "attention", there are better ways to add value then by subtracting positive teamwork.
Posted by Dawn Mular on April 28, 2008 at 08:27 AM EST #