|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FEEDS SEARCH LINKS CONTACT Douglas McCallum Template by Helquin Today's hits: 15 |
Monday Nov 05, 2007
Sharemgr gets a new protocol
In general, sharemgr behaves for SMB the same as it does for NFS. The NFS functionality hasn't been changed other than the resource names can be used as an alias for the path. A given share group may have either or both "nfs" and "smb" enabled. When SMB is enabled, there may be some things that are required for NFS that weren't when only NFS was enabled. Subsequent blog entries will discuss the SMB support in more detail. Others bloggers will be covering the SMB functionality in more detail. Posted at 07:54AM Nov 05, 2007 by Douglas McCallum in General | Comments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||