The View from the Moon

20080625 Wednesday June 25, 2008

BigAdmin Updates Zones Page
The zones team recently identified was that our web presence has been lacking.  A quick survey surprised us: the relatively unloved BigAdmin: Solaris Containers page generates a lot of daily visits.  We realized that this is because it is the top search result if you google for "Solaris Zones".  So Penny and Robert (one of the BigAdmin maintainers) set out to make improvements.  The new page is now posted.  Take a look!  Also, if you have suggestions for further improvements, or pointers to materials we should add, please leave them in my blog's comments section.

(2008-06-25 13:13:01.0) Permalink
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/bigadmin_updates_zones_page
 

20080618 Wednesday June 18, 2008

Blastwave on Solaris 8 Containers

I just got word of a great new Solaris 8 Containers success story on sun.com, from blastwave.org.  I think my favorite quote from Dennis Clarke (Founder of Blastwave) is:

"I virtualized critical Solaris 8 production servers and nobody noticed.  I literally shut the server down, backed it up, created a Solaris 8 Container, restored the environment, and brought the server back up. The process was simple, transparent, and completely flawless."

Our team did a lot of challenging work to ensure this sort of customer experience.  It's gratifying to see it pay off for an important contributor to the Solaris ecosystem.

So if you've been trying to persuade your PHB that you should give Solaris 8 Containers a try, here is a great reference!


(2008-06-18 11:38:44.0) Permalink Comments [4]
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/blastwave_on_solaris_8_containers
 

20080613 Friday June 13, 2008

Zones (Containers) Hosting Providers
I've been keeping track of a number of companies who provide virtual server hosting based on Solaris Zones.  Since we occasionally get asked about this, I thought I'd share my personal list.  This is not an endorsement of these businesses.  In the interest of full disclosure, I was once taken to lunch by David and Jason from Joyent.  Sorted alphabetically:

I'm pretty sure this list is incomplete.  I'll try to keep it updated as I learn more.  Feel free to post (or send me) corrections and additions, and I'll add them.

Finally, if you are a hosting provider, and want to consider adding zones to your suite of offerings, we're more than willing to talk, anytime.

Update #1: Added Gangus and Layered Technologies.
Update #2: Removed Layered Technologies (we're not sure); added Stability Hosting
Update #3 (6/30/2008): Added Beacon VPS (confirmed by email with Beacon)


(2008-06-13 00:42:42.0) Permalink Comments [14]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/zones_containers_hosting_providers
 

20080604 Wednesday June 04, 2008

ii_bitmap=1; ii_bitmap=1; ii_bitmap=1; ii_bitmap=1; ...

Sometimes when you go hunting for bugs, it's pretty mundane.  Other times, you strike gold... 

On Monday night, Jan, Liane and I stayed late at work to help with some maintenance on our building's file and mail server, which we affectionately know as Jurassic.  The point of Jurassic is to run the latest Solaris Nevada builds in a production environment.  The system's regular admin is on vacation, and Jurassic was experiencing some unusual problems, and so a group of kernel engineers volunteered to help out.  It's our data, and our code, after all...

Jurassic had experienced two failed disks, and we really wanted wanted to replace those.  For some complicated reasons, we needed to reboot the system, which was fine with us anyway, because we wanted to see firsthand a problem which had been reported but not diagnosed: why was the svc:/system/filesystem/root:default service experiencing timeouts on boot? This service, it turns out, doesn't do much (despite its rather grand name): it takes care of finding and mounting a performance-optimized copy of libc, then runs a devfsadm invocation which ensures that the kernel has the latest copies of various driver.conf files.  This made the timeout we saw all the more puzzling: why would a five minute timeout expire for this service? To make matters worse, SMF tries three times to start this service, and so the aggregate time was 3 × 5 = 15 minutes.

Once we waited, what we found was pretty surprising: the "hang" we were seeing was due to seemingly stuck devfsadm processes-- three in fact:

# pgrep -lf devfsadm
100015 /usr/sbin/devfsadm -I -P
100050 /usr/sbin/devfsadm -I -P
100054 /usr/sbin/devfsadm -I -P

The next step I usually take in a case like this is to use pstack to see what the processes are doing.  However, in this case, that wasn't working:

# pstack 100050
pstack: cannot examine 100050: unanticipated system error
Hmm. Next we tried mdb -k, to look at the kernel:
  
  # mdb -k
mdb: failed to open /dev/ksyms: No such file or directory
This was one of those "oh shit..." moment.  This is not a failure mode I've seen before.  Jan and I speculated that because devfsadm was running, perhaps it was blocking device drivers from loading, or being looked up. Similarly:
# mpstat 1
mpstat: kstat_open failed: No such file or directory
This left us with one recourse: kmdb, the in situ kernel debugger.  We dropped in and looked up the first devfsadm process, walked its threads (it had only one) and printed the kernel stack trace for that thread:
# mdb -K
kmdb: target stopped at:
kmdb_enter+0xb: movq   %rax,%rdi
> 0t100015::pid2proc | ::walk thread | ::findstack -v
stack pointer for thread ffffff0934cbce20: ffffff003c57dc80
[ ffffff003c57dc80 _resume_from_idle+0xf1() ]
  ffffff003c57dcc0 swtch+0x221()
  ffffff003c57dd00 sema_p+0x26f(ffffff0935930648)
  ffffff003c57dd60 hwc_parse+0x88(ffffff09357aeb80, ffffff003c57dd90,
  ffffff003c57dd98)
  ffffff003c57ddb0 impl_make_parlist+0xab(e4)
  ffffff003c57de00 i_ddi_load_drvconf+0x72(ffffffff)
  ffffff003c57de30 modctl_load_drvconf+0x37(ffffffff)
  ffffff003c57deb0 modctl+0x1ba(12, ffffffff, 3, 8079000, 8047e14, 0)
  ffffff003c57df00 sys_syscall32+0x1fc()

The line highlighted above was certainly worth checking out-- you can tell just from the name that we're in a function which loads a driver.conf file.  We looked at the source code, here: i_ddi_load_drvconf().  The argument to this function, which you can see from the stack trace, is ffffffff, or -1.  You can see from the code that this indicates "load driver.conf files for all drivers" to the routine.  This ultimately results in a call to impl_make_parlist(m), where 'm' is the major number of the device. So what's the argument to impl_make_parlist()?  You can see it above, it's 'e4' (in hexadecimal).  Back in kmdb:

[12]> e4::major2name
ii

This whole situation was odd-- why would the kernel be (seemingly) stuck, parsing ii.conf?  Normally, driver.conf files are a few lines of text, and should parse in a fraction of a second. ⁞ We thought that perhaps the parser had a bug, and was in an infinite loop.  We figured that the driver's .conf file might have gotten corrupted, perhaps with garbage data.  Then the payoff:

$ ls -l /usr/kernel/drv/ii.conf
-rw-r--r--   1 root    sys     3410823  May 12 17:39  /usr/kernel/drv/ii.conf

$ wc -l ii.conf
  262237 ii.conf

Wait, what?  ii.conf is 262,237 lines long?  What's in it?

...
# 2 indicates that if FWC is present strategy 1 is used, otherwise strategy 0.
ii_bitmap=1;
#
#
# 2 indicates that if FWC is present strategy 1 is used, otherwise strategy 0.
ii_bitmap=1;
ii_bitmap=1;
#
#
# 2 indicates that if FWC is present strategy 1 is used, otherwise strategy 0.
ii_bitmap=1;
ii_bitmap=1;
ii_bitmap=1;
ii_bitmap=1;
#
...

This pattern repeats, over and over, with the number of ii_bitmap=1; lines doubling, for 18 doublings!  We quickly concluded that some script or program had badly mangled this file.  We don't use this driver on Jurassic, so we simply moved the .conf file aside.  After that, we were able to re-run the devfsadm command without problems.

Dan Mick later tracked down the offending script, the i.preserve packaging script for ii.conf, and filed a bug.  Excerpting from Dan's analysis:

 Investigating, it appears that SUNWiiu's i.preserve script, used as a class-action
 script for the editable file ii.conf, will:
 1) copy the entire file to the new version of the file each time it's run (grep -v -w                  
 with the pattern "ii_bitmap=" essentially copies the whole file, because lines                         
 consisting of "ii_bitmap=1;" are not matched in 'word' mode; the '=' is a word                         
 separator, not part of the word pattern itself)                                                        

 2) add two blank comment lines and one substantive comment each time it's run,                         
 despite presence of that line in the file (it should be tested before being                            
 added)                                                                                                 

 3) add in every line containing an instance of "ii_bitmap=" to the new file                            
 (which grows as a power of two).  (this also results from the grep -v -w                               
 above.)                                                                                                

 Because jurassic is consistently live-upgraded rather than fresh-installed,                            
 the error in the class-action script has multiplied immensely over time. 

This was all compounded by the fact that driver properties (like ii_bitmap=1;) are stored at the end of a linked list, which means that the entire list must be traversed prior to insertion. This essentially turns this into a (n+1)*n/2 pathology, where n is something like: (2LU+1)-1 (LU here is the number of times the system has been live-upgraded).  Plugging in the numbers we see:

(218 * 218) / 2 = 2^35 = 34 Billion

I wrote a quick simulation of this algorithm, and ran it on Jurassic.  It is just an approximation, but it's amazing to watch this become an explosive problem, especially as the workload gets large enough to fall out of the cpu's caches.

LU Generation  List Items
List Operations
Time (simulated) 
13
215 = 8192
225 = 33554432 .23s
14 216 = 16384 227 = 134217728
.97s
15 217 = 32768
229 = 536870912
5.7s
16
218 = 65536
231 = 2147483648
18.8s
17
219 = 131072
233 = 8589934592
2m06s
18
220 = 262144
235 = 34359738368
8m33s

Rest assured that we'll get this bug squashed.  As you can see, you're safe unless you've done 16 or more live upgrades of your Nevada system!

(2008-06-04 16:15:52.0) Permalink Comments [2]
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/ii_bitmap_1_2_lu
 

20080602 Monday June 02, 2008

Tiny Robot, Nice Lens

Here's a toy I picked up recently in New York at the Moma Store:

It's a little robot you build yourself from cleverly designed rolls of paper. He's called a Piperoid (he's apparently called "Jet Jonathan") and is from Piperoid Japan.  In the US, Piperoids seem to be available only from the MOMA Store.

This was a fun toy to build: the build process was logical, didn't take too long, and required just enough effort to feel satisfying.  No glue is needed.  The joints are movable and we've had fun with that.  He's about 5 inches tall.

This shot also demonstrates another toy, the Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D lens that Danek lent me to try out on my Nikon D40.   This picture was shot in dim incandescent light, although I did add a white LED point source to throw shadows-- due to color correction it appears somewhat blue in this picture.  I originally tried to shoot at f/1.8 (wide open, with the shallowest depth of field, and allowing the most light) but the depth of field is really narrow and I couldn't get enough of him in focus.  Focus was also tough because this lens is manual focus on the D40.  In the end I had to stop down to f/2.0 and settle for a slightly longer exposure time.  I needed to use my gorillapod wrapped over the back of a chair because the exposure was 1/5 sec.  To post-process I simply did an auto-normalize and and auto-white-balance in The Gimp.  For kicks, I tried the same shot on the kit lens (The AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G) that comes with the D40: to get a similar shot I needed about a 1.6 second exposure, and the results weren't nearly as nice.  For just over $100 USD, the 50mm lens is a good deal, but I sure wish Nikon would bring out some auto-focus prime lenses fully suited to the D40.  Thanks Danek!


(2008-06-02 00:58:33.0) Permalink
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/tiny_robot_nice_lens
 

20080521 Wednesday May 21, 2008

Vacation...

I'm taking a few days off following the OpenSolaris 2008.05 release to attend a wedding in New York.  Here are a couple of better shots from Manhattan, where I spent the weekend:

The Roasting Plant, an innovative coffee shop/roastery; everything is automated and all of the machinery was designed by the owners.  Beans swirl through the store in pneumatic tubes (click for larger versions):

Four seconds at Grand Central:

MOMA (from the Eliasson retrospective):


The view from Central Park:

I haven't yet had time to even do a basic editing pass over these.  The MOMA shot needs a bit of effort, I think.  I like the Grand Central shot quite a bit, but I really wish I'd had image stabilization.  At 100% the fine details are blurry.  I had a gorillapod, but the shot was tough to get, as people's footsteps on the stairway I was shooting from caused a fair amount of jiggle.


(2008-05-21 04:15:18.0) Permalink
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/vacation
 

20080512 Monday May 12, 2008

A field guide to Zones in OpenSolaris 2008.05

I have had a busy couple of months. After wrapping up work on Solaris 8 Containers (my teammate Steve ran the Solaris 9 Containers effort), I turned my attention to helping the Image Packaging team (rogue's gallery) with their efforts to get OpenSolaris 2008.05 out the door.

Among other things, I have been working hard to provide a basic level of zones functionality for OpenSolaris 2008.05. I wish I could have gotten more done, but today I want to cover what does and does not work. I want to be clear that Zones support in OpenSolaris 2008.05 and beyond will evolve substantially. To start, here's an example of configuring a zone on 2008.05:

# zonecfg -z donutshop
donutshop: No such zone configured
Use 'create' to begin configuring a new zone.
zonecfg:donutshop> create
zonecfg:donutshop> set zonepath=/zones/donutshop
zonecfg:donutshop> add net
zonecfg:donutshop:net> set physical=e1000g0
zonecfg:donutshop:net> set address=129.146.228.5/23
zonecfg:donutshop:net> end
zonecfg:donutshop> add capped-cpu
zonecfg:donutshop:capped-cpu> set ncpus=1.5
zonecfg:donutshop:capped-cpu> end
zonecfg:donutshop> commit
zonecfg:donutshop> exit

# zoneadm list -vc
  ID NAME             STATUS     PATH                           BRAND    IP    
   0 global           running    /                              native   shared
   - donutshop        configured /zones/donutshop               ipkg     shared

If you're familiar with deploying zones, you can see that there is a lot which is familiar here.  But you can also see that donutshop isn't, as you would normally expect, using the native brand. Here we're using the ipkg brand. The reason is that commands like zoneadm and zonecfg have some special behaviors for native zones which presume that you're using a SystemV Packaging based OS. In the future, we'll make native less magical, and the zones you install will be branded native as you would expect. Jerry is actually working on that right now. Note also that I used the relatively new CPU Caps resource management feature to put some resource limits on the zone-- it's easy to do!. Now let's install the zone:

# zoneadm -z donutshop install
A ZFS file system has been created for this zone.

      Image: Preparing at /zones/donutshop/root ... done.
    Catalog: Retrieving from http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80/ ... done.
 Installing: (output follows)
DOWNLOAD                                    PKGS       FILES     XFER (MB)
Completed                                  49/49   7634/7634 206.85/206.85 

PHASE                                        ACTIONS
Install Phase                            12602/12602 

       Note: Man pages can be obtained by installing SUNWman
Postinstall: Copying SMF seed repository ... done.
Postinstall: Working around http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=681
Postinstall: Working around http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=741
       Done: Installation completed in 208.535 seconds.

 Next Steps: Boot the zone, then log into the zone console
             (zlogin -C) to complete the configuration process

There are a couple of things to notice, both in the configuration and in the install:
Non-global zones are not sparse, for now
Zones are said to be sparse if /usr, /lib, /platform, /sbin and optionally /opt are looped back, read-only, from the global zone. This allows a substantial disk space savings in the traditional zones model (which is that the zones have the same software installed as the global zone).

Whether we will ultimately choose to implement sparse zones, or not, is an open question. I plan to bring this question to the Zones community, and to some key customers, in the near future.

Zones are installed from a network repository
Unlike with traditional zones, which are sourced by copying bits from the global zone, here we simply spool the contents from the network repository. The upside is that this was easy to implement; the downside is that you must be connected to the network to deploy a zone. Getting the bits from the global zone is still desirable, but we don't have that implemented yet.

By default, zones are installed using the system's preferred authority (use pkg authority to see what that is set to). The preferred authority is the propagated into the zone. If you want to override that, you can specify a different repository using the new -a argument to zoneadm install:

# zoneadm -z donutshop install -a ipkg=http://ipkg.eng:80
Non-global zones are small
Traditionally, zones are installed with all of the same software that the global zone contains. In the case of "whole root" zones (the opposite of sparse), this means that non-global zones are about the same size as global zones-- easily at least a gigabyte in size.

Since we're not supporting sparse zones, I decided to pare down the install as much as I could, within reason: the default zone installation is just 206MB, and has a decent set of basic tools. But you have to add other stuff you might need. And we can even do more: some package refactoring should yield another 30-40MB of savings, as packagings like Tcl and Tk should not be needed by default. For example, Tk (5MB) gets dragged in as a dependency of python (the packaging system is written in python); Tcl (another 5MB) is dragged in by Tk. Tk then pulls in parts of X11. Smallness yields speed: when connected to a fast package repository server, I can install a zone in just 24 seconds!.

I'm really curious to know what reaction people will have to such minimalist environments. What do you think?

Once you start thinking about such small environments, some new concerns surface: vim (which in 2008.05 we're using as our vi implementation) is 17MB, or almost 9% of the disk space used by the zone!

Non-global zones are independent of the global zone
Because ipkg zones are branded, they exist independently of the global zone. This means that if you do an image-update of the global zone, you'll also need to update each of your zones, and ensure that they are kept in sync. For now this is a manual process-- in the future we'll make it less so.
ZFS support notes
OpenSolaris 2008.05 makes extensive use of ZFS, and enforces ZFS as the root filesystem. Additional filesystems are created for /export, /export/home and /opt. Non-global zones don't yet follow this convention. Additionally, I have sometimes seen our auto-zfs file system creation fail to work (you can see it working properly in the example above). We haven't yet tracked down that problem-- my suspicion is that there is a bad interaction with the 2008.05 filesystem layout's use of ZFS legacy mounts.

As a result of this (and for other reasons too, probably), zones don't participate in the boot-environment subsystem. This means that you won't get an automatic snapshot when you image-update your zone or install packages. That means no automatic rollback for zones. Again, this is something we will endeavor to fix.

Beware of bug 6684810
You may see a message like the following when you boot your zone:
zoneadm: zone 'donutshop': Unable to set route for interface lo0 to éÞùÞ$
zoneadm: zone 'donutshop': 
This is a known bug (6684810); fortunately the message is harmless.

In the next month, I hope to: take a vacation, launch a discussion with our community about sparse root zones, and to make a solid plan for the overall support of zones on OpenSolaris. I've got a lot to do, but that's easily balanced by the fact that I've been having a blast working on this project...


(2008-05-12 06:16:16.0) Permalink Comments [26]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/a_field_guide_to_zones
 

20080511 Sunday May 11, 2008

Songbird for Solaris

Looks like Alfred's hard work has paid off.  You can pull down a package of Songbird for OpenSolaris (see Alfred's blog entry for the links).  Songbird is a next-gen media player built atop the Mozilla platform.   Although I've had it crash once, on the whole it has worked quite well.  SteveL's mashtape extension is really neat, and you can see it in action in the screenshot below (it's the thing offering pictures, youtube videos, etc. at the bottom of the window).

Next steps would be to get this into the OpenSolaris package repository-- I hope that someday soon you will be able to pkg install songbird.

Nice work guys!


(2008-05-11 23:09:16.0) Permalink Comments [2]
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/songbird_for_solaris
 

20080410 Thursday April 10, 2008

Solaris 8 Containers, Solaris 9 Containers

In the flurry of today's launch event, we've launched Solaris 8 Containers (which was previously called Solaris 8 Migration Assistant, or Project Etude).  Here is the datasheet about the product.  Even better: We've also announced that Solaris 9 Containers will be available soon!  Jerry and Steve on the containers team have been toiling away like mad to make this possible.

Why the rename?  Well, for one thing, it's easier to say :)  It also signals a shift in the way Sun will offer this technology to customers:

  • Professional Services Engagement: No longer required, now recommend.  It's also simpler to order a SunPS engagement for this product.
  • Partners: (Some of) Sun's partners are now ready to deliver this solution to customers.  Talk to your partner for more information.
  • Right to Use: Previously, we provided a 90 day evaluation RTU.  Now, the RTU is unlimited.  However, you must still pay for support.
I invite you to download Solaris 8 Containers, and give it a try! And as always, talk to your local SE or Sales Rep if you're interested in obtaining support licenses (or any kind of help with) your Solaris 8 (or 9) containers.

Here's Joost, our fearless marketing leader, with an informative talk about the why and how of Solaris 8 Containers. 


(2008-04-10 01:36:10.0) Permalink Comments [8]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/solaris_8_containers_solaris_9
 

20080404 Friday April 04, 2008

Finding bugs in python code, using DTrace

I have spent a lot of time in recent months helping the IPS project.  This week I integrated usability improvements, and tracked down two different performance problems.  The first was notable because I think it's the kind of thing that would have been hard to find without DTrace.   Here's a writeup I did, cribbed from the bug report:

While doing work on IPS I discovered a large number of system calls being made during the "creating plan" phase of a fresh installation of the 'redistributable' cluster of packages.

I used the following crude dtrace script to track down the problem:

#!/usr/sbin/dtrace -Fs

python$1:::function-entry
/copyinstr(arg1) == $$2/
{
self->t=1;
calls++;
}

python$1:::function-return
/copyinstr(arg1) == $$2 && self->t/
{
self->t=0;
}

syscall:::entry
/self->t/
{
@a[probefunc]=count()
}

END
{
printf("calls: %d", calls);
}

No points for elegance but it works.

Successive guesses allowed me to narrow this down to the get_link_actions() routine. Here's an example of its system call impact during the following sequence:

# rm -fr /tmp/foo
# export PKG_IMAGE=/tmp/foo
# pkg image-create -a foo=http://ipkg.eng /tmp/foo
# pkg install -n redistributable
I ran the D script as follows:
$ dtrace -s /s4pyfunc.d `pgrep client` get_link_actions
And once the command was done, got this output:
CPU     ID                    FUNCTION:NAME
0 2 :END calls: 880

brk 26
stat64 774400
close 775280
fcntl 775280
fsat 775280
fstat64 775280
getdents64 1553200
So here we can see that something is amiss-- this routine is the source of 4.7 million syscalls. Here's the code:
        def get_link_actions(self):
""" return a dictionary of hardlink action lists indexed by
target """
(a) if self.link_actions:
return self.link_actions

d = {}
for act in self.gen_installed_actions():
if act.name == "hardlink":
t = act.get_target_path()
if t in d:
d[t].append(act)
else:
d[t] = [act]

self.link_actions = d
return d

When Bart and I first looked at this, it seemed by inspection to be working as designed-- the first time the routine is called, we populate a cache, and subsequently the cache is returned. At some point Bart went "Aha!" and we realized that the problem here was that the comparison at (a) wasn't working right, and that, for a not-yet-installed image, the link_actions dictionary is exactly equal to {}, the empty dictionary. That evaluates to "false" in python. So we always think that we haven't yet filled out the link_actions cache, and go to fill it. That sends us into gen_installed_actions(), which is expensive. It seems to get more and more expensive as we accumulate more manifests, as well.

So, while there are exactly zero link actions we need to worry about, we rescan all manifests for every new manifest we evaluate.

This is a situation which will crop up most often with zones, since that's the place we're most likely to create new images from scratch.

The fix is very simple: set self->link_actions to None initially (in the object constructor), and change the comparison at (a) to test against None explictly.

Having fixed this, the impact of get_link_actions is:
CPU     ID                    FUNCTION:NAME
0 2 :END calls: 880

stat64 3
close 4
fcntl 4
fsat 4
fstat64 4
getdents64 8
Or, basically, nothing. In some informal testing I got these numbers with ptime(1): Before:
real     1:26.730
user 1:10.988
sys 11.624
After:
real     1:12.932
user 1:02.475
sys 6.361

Or about a 19% improvement in real time. And quite a bit in sys time. Not a huge win, but not too shabby either.

I used the same technique to find a similar bug in another part of the code, but alas, Danek had already found the same bug, so I can't claim it.

(2008-04-04 18:10:51.0) Permalink Comments [3]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/finding_bugs_in_python_code
 

20080328 Friday March 28, 2008

OpenSolaris Elections Disappointment

The results of the OpenSolaris Elections are in.  Congratulations to the new board members!

So why did I entitle this post Elections Disappointment?  My complaint is with the "community priorities" question which was asked; this was a chance for core contributors to indicate what they felt were pressing priorities.  I was not happy with the OGB's choice (which I didn't know about until I voted) to reuse the same set of priorities questions from last year.  One of which was:

  • Deploy a public code review facility on opensolaris.org

Which was subsequently identified by voters in this election as the #3 priority.  Did the OGB believe that we did not accomplish this goal in the past year?  I know that I took the results of the last poll (it was voted #3 in that poll, too) to heart, and worked hard to make that goal a reality, publicized it using the official channels, and have been enhancing it and taking care of it since that time, mostly on my own time.  I felt that my contribution was really undermined by the question.

Second: Who voted for this item as a priority?  If you voted for this as a priority, I would like to hear why you did (anonymously is fine).  Are you unaware that cr.opensolaris.org exists?  Are you unsatisfied with the service it provides?

I hope the new OGB will find a way to reformulate a more cogent poll question about priorities.


(2008-03-28 16:26:55.0) Permalink Comments [6]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/opensolaris_elections_disappointment
 

20080324 Monday March 24, 2008

cr.opensolaris.org gets an ATOM feed

For the past couple of weeks, I have been working late at night and on weekends to add an ATOM feed (i.e. blog feed) to cr.opensolaris.org, so that as people post new code reviews, they are automatically discovered and published.  Stephen has been heckling me to do this work for more than a year.  This weekend I managed to finish it, despite the incredibly nice weather in the bay area: I was stuck inside with a nasty cold.

As an aside, I'm looking for help with cr.opensolaris.org.  This is a great opportunity for someone to step up and help out with an important part of our community infrastructure.  Send me mail.

You can check out the results of my hacking on cr.opensolaris.org.  Or you can subscribe to the feed.  If you want to opt-out of publishing reviews, you can create a file called "opt-out" in the same directory as your webrev's index.html file.  Or you can create a file called "opt-out" in your home directory, if you'd like to opt out of all reviews.

Implementation Notes 

This was an interesting learning experience for me, since I had to learn a lot about ATOM in the process.  I also learned the XSLT language along the way as well, and how to process HTML using python.  All in all, I'd say this project took about 20 hours of effort, and resulted in about 500 lines of python code.  The most difficult problems to solve were:

  • I wanted the feed to include some meaningful information about the codereview.  If you subscribe to the feed using your favorite reader, you'll see that a portion of the "index.html" file from each webrev is included.  This is done using a somewhat tricky piece of python code.  In retrospect, using XSL for this might have been a better choice, although I've found that people have a tendency to introduce non-standard HTML artifacts into their webrev index.html files, and I don't know how well XSL would cope with that.

  • ATOM has some rules about generating unique and lasting IDs for things-- this is the contents of the <id> tag in the ATOM specification.  I found a lot of valuable information on dive-into-mark.  For cr.opensolaris.org, this was complicated by the fact that the user might log in and move their codereview around, or might copy one review over another.  In the end, I solved this by remembering the <id> tag in a dot-file which rides along with the codereview.  A cronjob roves around the filesystem looking for new reviews, and adds the special tag-file.  By storing the original <id> tag value, and looking at the modtime of the index.html file, I can correctly compute both the value of the <id> and <updated> fields for each entry.  If a user deletes a codereview, the dot-file will go away with it.

  • Once I had an ATOM feed I needed to transform it back into HTML for display on the home page.  The only problem was that there aren't a lot of good examples of this on the web-- many of the ATOM-to-HTML conversions only work with ATOM 0.3, not the 1.0 specification, and I didn't know the first thing about XPATH or XSL.  In the end, I only needed 25 lines or so of XSLT code.

Future Work 

I think of the current implementation as a "1.0"-- it'll probably last us pretty well for a while.  One thing I'd like to research for a future revision is actually placing the entries into a lightweight blog engine, and letting it do the rest of the work: Using an excellent list from Social Desire I took a quick look at Blosxom, Flatpress, Nanoblogger, and some others.


(2008-03-24 14:22:56.0) Permalink Comments [3]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/cr_opensolaris_org_gets_an
 

20080129 Tuesday January 29, 2008

The joy of 'zpool scrub'

Some days, when it's cold and you're not feeling very motivated (like me, today), it's nice to do a zpool scrub on the machines you manage, and then once it's done:

$ zpool status
  pool: aux
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Tue Jan 29 15:52:38 2008
config:

        NAME          STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        aux           ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror      ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t0d0s7  ONLINE       0     0     0
            c1t1d0s7  ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors
And then relax, knowing that your data is safe.
(2008-01-29 17:23:44.0) Permalink Comments [2]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/the_joy_of_zpool_scrub
 

20071204 Tuesday December 04, 2007

Podcast on Etude!

Hal Stern invited Joost and I to sit down for a chat about the Solaris 8 Migration Assistant for an episode of his podcast Innovating@Sun.  This was my first podcast experience and it was a lot more fun than I had expected.   Check it out here, or you can download the MP3 audio directly.


(2007-12-04 18:14:56.0) Permalink Comments [1]
Tags:
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/podcast_on_etude
 

20071114 Wednesday November 14, 2007

A big mess...

Recently I've been thinking about, learning about, and contributing to IPS, the Image Packaging System, a next generation package management solution project which is happening in the OpenSolaris community.  IPS happens to also be the packaging system project Indiana has elected to use.  Stephen has written extensively about his thoughts on his blog.  And Bart has too.  IPS subsumes a lot of existing functionality which appears in various parts of the system today.  But a lot of people seem to be willing to look at it only as a package manager in the sense that "pkgadd" is a package manager.

My problem with this is that "pkgadd" is only a small part of a larger problem.  So, to explain that, I want to distill a series of email posts I made to pkg-discuss last month into a coherent blog entry, since I've referred back to them a couple of times.

My feelings on this topic are pretty nicely summarized by an article by Peter J. Denning which recently appeared in Communications of ACM, entitled "Mastering the Mess."  The whole article is instructive, but see in particular: "Signs of Mess."

If one accepts Dr. Denning's "mess" framework, then the next question is whether we are in what he dubs, "a mess."  I personally think the answer is "yes."   In no particular order (apologies to anything I left out), as a community, we have:

 

  • SVR4 package creation tools
  • SVR4 package deployment tools
  • Sun's patch creation tools
  • Sun's patch application and inventory tools (patchadd, showrev -p)
  • PCA (Patch Check Advanced, a nice open source tool I use)
  • Solaris Patch Manager (smpatch)
  • pfinstall
  • Live Upgrade
  • flash archive creation and deployment tools
  • graphical install (old and dwarf caiman, etc)
  • ttinstall
  • Jumpstart
  • virt-install (from xVM)
  • zones install
  • zones attach/detach logic (which knows how to parse various patch and packaging databases)
  • So-called "toxic" patching for zones
  • Zones support for live upgrade (zulu)
  • BFU/ACR (update part of the system, but violates package metadata)
  • IDR (patches the system, but renders system subsequently unpatchable until IDR is removed and a "real patch" is applied)
  • Solaris Product Registry (I've never really understood what this was for, but you can try it via prodreg(1))
  • Service Tags -- a layer which adds "software RFID tags" in a sense: UUIDs backed by a Sun-maintained ontology; helps to inventory what is on your system.
  • pkg-get
  • Network Repositories (like Blastwave)
  • DVD media & CD media construction tools (several of these, I think)
  • Various other unbundled products which promise to ease "patching pain"
  • Various system minimization tools
  • Layered inventory management tools
  • Numerous hand-rolled and home-grown solutions built on some or all of the above.                                            

Some parts of the mess represent great (from the perspective of the those caught up in the mess) technologies which people have spent a lot of time and effort building.  But a lot of the above represent accreted layers with duplicated functionality.  In some cases, the various layers interact in complex and subtle, and perhaps interface-violating ways. To people outside of the mess (i.e. new users we would like to entice) the mess looks bizarre, and terrible.  Another sign of a "big mess":  In several cases, huge engineering efforts have resulting in only modest improvements.  In some cases, huge engineering efforts have been total failures: Sun attempted a rewrite of the SVR4 packaging system in the early part of this decade, the project basically failed.

It's easy to look at the above list and feel a sense of hopelessness-- how will we *ever* improve upon this situation?  Will people keep creating new and different tools which add more layers? 

I'll cite a second source which has helped guide my thinking on this topic: Jeff Bonwick.  Jeff spent years relentlessly seeking out and blowing up duplicated and broken kernel functionality, and then took on the storage stack.  The result was ZFS, which was recently labelled "a rampant layering violation" by a detractor.  Jeff responded this way.  In particular, Jeff said:

"We found that by refactoring the problem a bit -- that is, changing           
where the boundaries are between layers -- we could make the whole thing
much simpler."

Which to me summarizes my thinking about what the *opportunity* is here: to rethink the layers and to merge and unmerge them to come to a more complete, efficient, modern
solution.

IPS is heading in this direction: Packaging, patching, upgrade, live upgrade, the mechanisms for Software Delivery, the toolset for delivering packages/patches, and the software-enforced policy decisions seem to be condensing here into a coherent entity-- which means we'll have many fewer layers.  And because the system will be fast, lightweight, redistributable and shared, we should also be able to discard artifacts such as BFU and ACR (in other words, OpenSolaris developers will use the same tools our customers use to update systems).  The huge amount of code which handles zones patch and packaging should be greatly reduced.  Package dependencies will be far more accurate and minimization will be easier, and diskless client support should be far more robust.

What I see with Caiman, IPS and Distro Constructor is the opportunity to do for software delivery and update to OpenSolaris systems what ZFS did for storage management.  I do not think we have all the answers just yet, but I think we can get there.


(2007-11-14 13:47:08.0) Permalink Comments [4]
Trackback: http://blogs.sun.com/dp/entry/a_big_mess
 

Dan Price's Weblog
[about me]