The speeds that are indicated above are a bit odd.
On the presentation, one slide notes that they are per lane. Another slide neglects to point this out. A pair of 10G ethernet interfaces that operate at only 3.125Gb is kinda odd since each port has a 10Gb signaling rate.
Most of it is finally explained on the slide on page 15, where we see that there is a total aggregate throughput of 921.6Gb/s for the memory, 40 for the PCI-E bus and 100 for the 10Gig-E interface. Thus, they could saturate five 10G ports if they wanted to design in the physical interfaces. The odd part is the imbalance of the memory interfaces. There are 14 "north bound" (Rx) lanes and only 10 "south bound (Tx) lanes.
Posted by
John
on February 14, 2007 at 07:15 PM PST
#
On the presentation, one slide notes that they are per lane. Another slide neglects to point this out. A pair of 10G ethernet interfaces that operate at only 3.125Gb is kinda odd since each port has a 10Gb signaling rate.
Most of it is finally explained on the slide on page 15, where we see that there is a total aggregate throughput of 921.6Gb/s for the memory, 40 for the PCI-E bus and 100 for the 10Gig-E interface. Thus, they could saturate five 10G ports if they wanted to design in the physical interfaces. The odd part is the imbalance of the memory interfaces. There are 14 "north bound" (Rx) lanes and only 10 "south bound (Tx) lanes.
Posted by John on February 14, 2007 at 07:15 PM PST #