...some readers where quick to point out that IBM didn't have a "real" quad-core design for its processor.
but Nathan Brookwood has the right answer:
"This isn't a computer science project where the guy who does the more elegant design gets extra credit," Brookwood of Insight 64 says. "If the chip has four cores, you can say it's a quad-core design."
Now that we know what a quad core is, let's look a bit farther.
IBM had a press release on 8/23, "IBM Delivers Enhanced Quad Core Systems"
They claim to be "the first in the industry with four cores per socket"
"IBM has also updated its line of Quad Core systems -- the first in the industry with four cores per socket --
with the new 1.65GHz POWER5+ Quad Core Module, delivering tremendous performance density and
value at prices on par with less capable commodity servers."
"IBM claims that the module gives it "the first (systems) in the industry with four cores per socket,"
which is true to a degree. Big Blue has used the four-core module kludge since October of 2005. Sun,
however, sells four-, six- and eight-core versions of its UltraSPARC T1 chips with all the cores on a single
piece of silicon. Those systems, announced in November of 2005, play in the same Unix space as IBM's gear."
So they beat Sun by one month? Did they start shipping product that date or was the press release just early? Maybe Sun can claim to have the first eight cores per socket? Does it matter?
Pushing the innovative envelope even further as well as truly a first, is the open sourcing of the UltraSPARC T1 design. The OpenSPARC T1, is a 64 bit, 32 threaded processor design available at no charge. Sun provided the entire RTL description of the processor design under the GNU General Public License (GPL). Now you can see for yourself how the chip multi-threading (CMT) technology unique to the UltraSPARC T1 works.
So go forth and innovate.... (also let see who follows :)
Very true.
But when articles write about "IBM had its first dual-core in 2001 and Sun in 2004; AMD followed in 2005 and Intel later that year", you know you've already won mindshare. Its all about perception .
Being first with some design has bragging value, even if it may not have much practical value!
Posted by
192.18.43.249
on August 31, 2006 at 03:12 PM PDT
#
But when articles write about "IBM had its first dual-core in 2001 and Sun in 2004; AMD followed in 2005 and Intel later that year", you know you've already won mindshare. Its all about perception .
Being first with some design has bragging value, even if it may not have much practical value!
Posted by 192.18.43.249 on August 31, 2006 at 03:12 PM PDT #