All it took was a "fridge-sized" computer with tiny core memory allowing between 16 and 64 kilowords:
Read more on this first successful email transmission.
All it took was a "fridge-sized" computer with tiny core memory allowing between 16 and 64 kilowords:
Read more on this first successful email transmission.
"Email has had a good run as king of communications. But its reign is over."
I hardly doubt it. I can see the move to a services approach, and an integration of those services. But much too early to claim outright demise.
The Messaging Server community certainly knows how to deal with this:
And the survey is in: Spam in a landslide!
Mozilla Foundation to evolve Thunderbird.
Inbox Zero. This guy's on to something big, er, small, er, zero. Been giving it a try since 7/25, and by George, it works. Watch the vid, feel the power.
There was an interesting conversation on the Info-iMS alias last week concerning "bounced email" that caught my eye. Ah, another learning opportunity! To recap, then, here is another installment of Comms 101, courtesy of our Comms experts.
The specific error sited was:
nsmail Illegal host/domain name found (Too many failures to this host during this run; skipping this host: No such host/domain)
The short reply as to what's going on is fairly intuitive: the remote domain in question failed to resolve to a legal result, meaning that almost certainly this is a DNS issue (and not a Messaging Server MTA issue). Note that "other mail" will continue to make it through to your system (expected behavior), so don't be mystified by that activity. In addition, the error message is communicating that the problem has happened multiple times during the current operation (run) of the channel. The message bouncing is thus occurring because of an underlying DNS problem. To troubleshoot this problem, you would need to enable debugging (such as on LOG_CONNECTION) to determine the specific issue. Very likely, such a problem is transitory in nature but it is clearly not an MTA issue. Of final note: fancy configuration workarounds to such a situation are typically more work than troubleshooting and fixing the real problem.
The full detail on this thread can be found here:
http://lists.balius.com/pipermail/info-ims-archive/2007-April/027757.html
I like it when I can say, here's some new information for you. As I mentioned yesterday, we were close to getting out a cool article (and it's actually the script that is cool) for generating an automatic email to your Calendar Server users, containing that day's appointments and tasks. Have at it:
Receiving a Daily Summary of Sun Java System Calendar Server Events and Tasks by Email
Thanks to Mike d. for contributing this info.
As I wrote about in this previous blog entry, I've been working in conjunction with one of our Calendar Server gurus to document how to provide your Calendar Server users with a daily summary of their Calendar Server events and tasks, emailed to their inbox or mobile device each weekday morning. I've got the article on our internal staging site, and it should be pushed out this week to BigAdmin.
While were at it, for more fun with Calendar Server, see this post by a new Sun employee (formerly with SeeBeyond) and his positive experiences with Thunderbird and the Lightning extension that is part of the Sunbird Mozilla project, to access his Calendar Server data from w/i Thunderbird.
So you want every sent email from every employee to carry a company disclaimer message. Whether because of increased awareness of confidentially, legality, or fashion, appending disclaimer messages to out-going mail is here with us.
But before asking how to do this with the Sun Java System Messaging Server MTA, step back and ask if you really need to do this. Start by reading the following:
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/apply.html
Here's perhaps the money quote:
"In the end, I think, although I am vastly ignorant of the law here, that adding disclaimers only makes you more vulnerable. This is because without disclaimers reasonable conventions and existing law apply. But once you add the disclaimer you had better get it exactly right and on exactly the right messages, and you sacrifice reasonable convention."
Okay, let's say that in spite of this advice, you want to proceed full steam ahead anyways and get every outgoing message from the MTA to bear this disclaimer stamp. Our experts advise the following:
For more information, see the following:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2650/6n4u4dtr3?a=view
Some Troubleshooting Advice
If you configure the MTA as described above, and run into problems where the disclaimer is not appearing, you should begin by looking at your conversions file, and get a master_debug conversion channel debug log file. (The tcp_local_slave.log-* file, and the mappings file, are just about getting the message to the conversion channel. The appending of the disclaimer would be done by the conversion channel, so you need to see what the conversion channel itself is doing.)
Interesting predictions for 2007 on mobile email and backup/restore from Synchronica CEO Carsten Brinkschulte:
This blog copyright 2009 by mb