« November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
       
Today
XML

Blog::Navigation

Blog::Editing

Bookmarks::Blogroll

Bookmarks::News

Site notes

This page validates as XHTML 1.0, and will look much better in a browser that supports web standards, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device. It was created using techniques detailed at glish.com/css/.

Powered by Roller Weblogger.
All | General | Java | Music
« Is Sarbanes Oxley a... | Main | What is Compliance... »
20040610 Thursday June 10, 2004
Securites Industry Association Show Yesterday I attended the SIA in New York at the Hilton Hotel. I have a law degree, a 20 year background in technology, worked in law firms, did litigation support, and I have to tell you I was amazed at the hype and damned lies I heard around compliance with various regulations. Some vendors went so far as to say they were certified (Not possible) for Sarbanes Oxley. Another vendor claimed a competitors clients as their own. It was shameful. On another note, there is a new magazine that has just been published called "Corporate Compliance Advisor". It has a real world example article, a analysis article, Sarbanes Oxley and HIPPA sections, as well as a litigation preparedness article. I found their Sarbanes Oxley software roundup to be severely lacking. However, the price, $99.00 annually is steep for the information contained therein. But specialized information can be pricey. One sidenote, Gartner has a nice full page ad on the inside cover. One notable quote "Firms that focus only on compliance will miss the chance to strengthen corporate governance and transparency, which in turn can lead to better-informed decision making and higher ROI." I think this captures the idea that we can turn lemons into lemonade and treat compliance as an opportunity to improve profits. See www.advisor.com or complianceadvisor.com for details.
Comments:

It's also been very interesting to see some user sophistication to these vendor claims; many an ISV who slapped a SOX tag on a portal product in hopes of riding compliance's coat tails was sorely disappointed. Customers that I talk to are picking up on the snake oil claims pretty well.

Posted by Stephen O'Grady on June 11, 2004 at 11:57 AM PDT #

I was at the SIA show, but looking from a vendor perspective. Compliance (the theme of the show) was definately a hot topic. I didn't get much of a chance to scan what the other guys were offering in terms of email archival, but from various conference calls I gather that many vendors do claim to be "SEC certified." I am also bothered by the fear tactics employed. Not that we haven't used the threat of jail time a time or two, but I have to agree, there's a lot of claims being made that cannot be backed up, and unfortunately, customers are ready to latch onto them as a quick fix - rather than an solution that is going to be around in the next three years and actually improve profits and raise productivity. However, all vendors claim to do this, so in-depth research is required.

Posted by adele pham on July 02, 2004 at 08:28 AM PDT #

[Trackback] The original intent of Sarbanes Oxley is about accountability of executives but has morphed into something else within many enterprises. Is Sarbanes Oxley really the Expensive Consultant Full Employment Assurance Act?...

Posted by Thinking Out Loud: Thought Leadership from an Enterprise Architect on October 06, 2004 at 04:56 AM PDT #

[Trackback] Many within the community are in full agreement with my rants about industry analysts and their lack of coverage of open source products. In thinking about this problem, I have grown even more disappointed in their other practices. For example,...

Posted by Thinking Out Loud: Thought Leadership from an Enterprise Architect on October 30, 2004 at 09:24 AM PDT #

Post a Comment:

Comments are closed for this entry.
Copyright (C) 2003, Frank Lagorio's Weblog