Lawrence Scott

Financial Services at Sun
Thursday Jan 24, 2008

Credit Hangover

Last time around I talked briefly about "toxic cocktails". This morning we are officially experiencing what can only be termed the "credit hangover". While the Federal Reserve attempted to apply the "aspirin" of cheap funds, everyone knows that there is no quick fix to a headache that rages from periods of excess. And that's exactly what we now face. A recovery period.

Two weeks ago in New York we were discussing how we should approach firms in this era of revalued assets, bruised balance sheets, and humbled egos. Is this a time to push virtualization? Only if it results in cost savings. Is this a time to emphasize innovation? Only if it results in cost savings. Is this a time to discuss our open source strategy? Only if it results in cost savings. Are you getting the message?

One message was clear to all of us: discussing change for its own sake is a sure recipe for being shown the door. So what are some of the practical implications of the sub prime crisis on our industry and how should we respond? The best answer came from global banking leader Carl Morath. As firms write down their assets, the income impacts are obvious. More importantly, it becomes crucial for banks to become highly efficient. Translation: make the myriad customer interactions you have every day as cost effective as possible. Where do banks experience cost? In the call center.

How many of us have "zeroed out" of a financial institution's touchtone IVR system? My hand is up, can you see it? Each time I do that, it costs that institution an average of $15 for me just to say "hello". And I hate paying service fees (again, don't we all), so it becomes even more critical for my interaction with the institution to be automated yet "personal". Enter the voice platform. We are seeing a number of firms convert their legacy call center touchtone systems to automated voice response systems. So better customer interaction technology actually yields a 30 percent reduction in the "zero out" phenomenon (statistics courtesy of our friends at Genesyslab.com). And that's cost savings.

Customers get a more effective interaction with their provider and the financial institution reduces its costs while preserving a customer relationship. Who'd have thought that superior customer interaction would be the antidote to the "toxic cocktail"? Well, perhaps not the antidote, but at least a painkiller.

Speaking of antidotes and cost pressures, do yourselves a favor and check out Sun's thin client technology. You know, the little machines with the Java card that identifies you to the machine? One of our West Coast clients has determined that our thin client technology will become the centerpiece of their data center consolidation strategy. Yes, you did not misread this last sentence. Virtualizing the desktop in a wide area network (WAN) environment all of a sudden frees up an organization from needing to decentralize application infrastructure on a regional basis. Combine that with the security benefits (military grade) and cost benefits (20 year MTBF) and all of a sudden you've got a winner. The real kicker though was the WAN performance. Many thin client solutions work well in traditional LAN environments. Ours delivers exceptional results in a low and high speed WAN environment. We use it every day at Sun; I have a Sun Ray at home and will pop out my Java card, head to New York or London, and pop in my Java card. No laptop to take through security. No file locations or names to remember. Stay tuned for some information on how and where you'll be able to see this in action. And finally, please remember two words: "The Incredibles".

Lastly, a few words on diversification. I've been pinged by the leadership at Sun to opine on the global market collapse. Here's a secret: when everyone runs in one direction, you should walk in the other. I sense that panic has set in and that anyone who reacts now is probably doing themselves a disservice. None of us have all of our eggs in one basket, neither personally nor professionally. We have a diversified customer portfolio which is served by a diversified product portfolio. Small customers and large ones alike do business with us every day in every part of the world. They did not take out a high risk mortgage. True, they might be affected by one (see Bank of China's planned write downs). But they have a diverse portfolio, no different than their peers in the rest of Asia, Europe, or the Americas. So yes, this is bad right now. But if you have a well-diversified asset (product or customer) base and you are prudent with regards to debt (manage your risk), you (and we) will come out of this "crisis" in reasonable shape.

Comments:

Could you go work for the government? Please?!?

"Does it increase profitability?" is probably a better question than "Does it save cost?" Cost-cutting isn't the only criteria that should be used to evaluate the efficacy of new technologies like virtualization, or new strategies like open source, but the Feds could certain apply some cost-cutting to my tax bill.

Posted by Wes Peters on January 24, 2008 at 06:11 PM EST #

What is your open source strategy? How can it result in cost savings for trading firms in NYC?

Posted by Raydo on February 03, 2008 at 02:22 PM EST #

Wes - I think we're arguing the same point. In the vein of "opposite sides of the same coin". Agree whole heartedly that cost cutting is not sole rationale for new tech acquisition. That said, many are now looking at cost as a result of the sub-prime fall out.

And I tried the fed government right after I graduated university. Decided NOT to follow in my father's footsteps.

Posted by Larry on February 21, 2008 at 07:07 PM EST #

Raydo - Sun's OSS strategy is pretty straight forward: try a bevy of developer and application tools and technologies and when you are ready to deploy, give Sun a call. Call it the "try and buy" program for software.

Our Glassfish app server has been benchmarked as the fastest stuff out there.

Our recently announced acquisition of MySQL makes us a prohibitive favorite in the open source DB space.

OpenSolaris is kickin' butt; had reaction recently from former CTO of big ISV who is swapping his RHEL subscription for ours.

Bottom line: build your new trading app with our OSS stack and when you're ready to deploy, then you pay for it. Until then, you pay only for training. Stay tuned for a primer on why/how an OS helps you build a better and more reliable trading app.

Posted by Larry Scott on February 21, 2008 at 07:16 PM EST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed

Archives
Links
Referrers