Glenn Brunette's Security Weblog


Solaris 10 Password History

Tuesday Sep 28, 2004

Today's topic is short and sweet: password history. For those who are not aware, the concept of password history is to prevent users from repeatedly selecting the same (set) of passwords over and over again (within some fixed time window). The actual time window will depend on the configuration of the system.

Often, password history is used in combination with password composition rules and password aging. For example, an organization may prohibit user's from selecting a password that is defined in some dictionary list or one that does not meet some minimum set of composition requirements. Further, the same organization may also mandate that user's must change their password every ninety days (but no sooner than one week after the last successful change). The goal here is to require users to select strong passwords, change them regularly and limit their future reuse. Without password history, what would stop a user from repeatedly selecting the same password (or small set of passwords - or even just rotating between two valid passwords) at each password expiration event?

Password history helps to solve this issue by enforcing a policy that says that a user may not reuse any of the last n passwords (where n is defined by the organization). So, for example, by setting both password history and aging settings appropriately, an organization could prevent the reuse of passwords for a significant period of time.

So, let's talk about specifics. New to Solaris 10 is the HISTORY parameter in the /etc/default/passwd file. This new parameter specifies the number of passwords that will be remembered - and consequently compared against a user's new password to see if it had been used before. By default, password history is disabled. If you want to enable password history then you must uncomment the HISTORY parameter and assign it a value. This value will indicate the number of passwords that the system should remember. This parameter can take values ranging from 0 to 26. For example:

# grep "^HISTORY=" /etc/default/passwd
HISTORY=10

In this example, password history has been enabled and a user's last ten passwords will be remembered. So, if I user attempts to re-use a password that is in their history, the change will be denied and the user will be presented with the following message:

$ passwd gmb
Enter existing login password:
New Password:
passwd: Password in history list.

Please try again
New Password:

Once password aging has been enabled, it can be disabled by setting the HISTORY parameter to 0 or by commenting it out in the /etc/default/passwd file. Once this is done, all users' prior password history will be discarded at the next password change by any user. Note that this is a very important point. When password history is disabled, the entire password history database will be discarded upon the next password change event by any user on the system.

In my previous posts I have tried to highlight global changes versus settings that can be applied to individual users. In the case of password history, it can only be defined on a global basis. There are no per-user settings for this feature.

Now that I have covered the basics of enabling, configuring and disabling password history, one last question may still be nagging at you - where is the password history database kept? The password history database is stored in the /etc/security/passhistory file. This file is an implementation artifact of the password history feature and is not meant to be modified by end users. This file has the following ownership and permissions:

-r--------   1 root     root          47 Sep 28 22:21 /etc/security/passhistory

Those curious enough to poke around this file will find that it contains a list of users (one per line) as well as their last n password hashes separated by a colon. For example, the above file has the following contents:

# cat /etc/security/passhistory
gmb:TRltRapbB7Eek:l5rXbTq1EJ7bQ:yEB668aaGv5z6:LgbM3LpCsERlA:

What is really cool about how password history is implemented in Solaris 10 is that it will work as you change your default password encryption algorithm using the flexible crypt mechanism (introduced in Solaris 9). For example, after changing my password encryption algorithm from the Solaris default to Blowfish, this is what happens:

# grep "^HISTORY=" /etc/default/passwd
HISTORY=10

# grep "^CRYPT_DEFAULT=" /etc/security/policy.conf
CRYPT_DEFAULT=__unix__

# cat /etc/security/passhistory
gmb:aMPK0ug.Syoag:Lp145TNOHmdlM:

# grep "^CRYPT_DEFAULT=" /etc/security/policy.conf
CRYPT_DEFAULT=2a

# grep "^2a" /etc/security/crypt.conf
2a      crypt_bsdbf.so.1

# passwd gmb
New Password:
Re-enter new Password:
passwd: password successfully changed for gmb

# cat /etc/security/passhistory
gmb:$2a$04$A.vGapPSCtbmXj3B9hYK..7fkgJqpg3YKXFoOt1T.YLBk0xw5p9E.:aMPK0ug.Syoag:Lp145TNOHmdlM:

First, I verified that I was using the default password encryption algorithm ("__unix__"). I used the passwd(1) command twice (not shown) to define passwords for the gmb account. Those password hashes were recorded in the /etc/security/passhistory file. I then changed the default password encryption algoritm to Blowfish ("2a") and changed the password for the gmb account once more. Each time I changed the password, I used a new, unique password.

Now we are ready for the real test. I will try to select each of the three passwords that are in my password history. Two of the passwords are currently stored in default ("__unix__") format and the other is stored in Blowfish format.

$ passwd gmb
Enter existing login password:
New Password:
passwd: Password in history list.

Please try again
New Password:
passwd: Password in history list.

Please try again New Password:
passwd: Password in history list.
Permission denied

As you can see, in each case, the password was recognized as having been in my password history. So, it doesn't matter if you simply use the default password algorithm or select another. This functionality will still just work. Don't you just love it!

Well, this one ran a little longer than I had originally thought, but I hope that you found it interesting nonetheless. Check back soon for another installment of lesser known and/or publicized security enhancements to the Solaris 10 OS. I still have a bunch lined up for you!

Let me know what you think of this series of articles as well as ideas for future updates. Take care!

Technorati Tag:

[6] Comments


Foundation for Minimal Solaris 10 Systems

Monday Sep 27, 2004

The topic for this article is the Solaris 10 Reduced Networking Software Group (also commonly known as the Solaris 10 Reduced Networking Meta Cluster). This software group is new and joins the five existing software groups available in Solaris today: Core, End User, Developer, Entire and Entire + OEM software groups. The Reduced Networking Software Group is positioned as a subset of Core and represents the smallest amount of Solaris that can or should be installed and have a working and supported system. Note that for support reasons, it is not advised to remove packages installed by the Reduced Networking Software Group.

To install the Reduced Networking Software Group, simply select it from the list when doing a graphical installation. If you are using JumpStart, then you should use the cluster keyword with the new value SUNWCrnet. The following is a sample JumpStart profile that uses the Reduced Networking Software Group. This profile was also used to build the system used as an example in this article.

install_type    initial_install
cluster         SUNWCrnet
partitioning    explicit
filesys         rootdisk.s1     768     swap
filesys         rootdisk.s0     free    /
system_type     standalone

During the installation process, you will see messages similar to the following:

Processing profile
        - Selecting cluster (SUNWCrnet)
        - Selecting all disks
        - Configuring boot device
        - Using disk (c0t0d0) for "rootdisk"
        - Configuring swap (c0t0d0s1)
        - Configuring / (c0t0d0s0)

One thing that may draw your attention is the following install-time message:

Verifying space allocation
        - Total software size:  152.67 Mbytes

Yes, it's true - the size of this installation is just a little over 150-Mbytes. Note that this size is based on the build of Solaris 10 that I was using and will certainly change before Solaris 10 is finalized, but I did want to mention it as an example of how small a Solaris installation can be. By leveraging the Reduced Networking Software Group, you are providing yourself with a solid foundation on which to deploy a minimized platform. So, let's see what we have...

# df -k
Filesystem            kbytes    used   avail capacity  Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0    7929156  164697 7685168     3%    /
/devices                   0       0       0     0%    /devices
ctfs                       0       0       0     0%    /system/contract
proc                       0       0       0     0%    /proc
mnttab                     0       0       0     0%    /etc/mnttab
swap                  956144     224  955920     1%    /etc/svc/volatile
objfs                      0       0       0     0%    /system/object
fd                         0       0       0     0%    /dev/fd
swap                  955928       8  955920     1%    /var/run
swap                  955920       0  955920     0%    /tmp

By the time all is said and done, the installed system is up to 161M. At present, this accounted for about 81 packages. This default configuration includes 28 set-uid programs and 11 set-gid programs. This is all much less than what is typically installed on most systems today. As noted above, this will certainly change before Solaris 10 is finalized, so don't hold me to those exact numbers. :-)

What is actually running on this system by default on this system? To answer this question, we look at the output of ps -aef:

# ps -aef
     UID   PID  PPID   C    STIME TTY         TIME CMD
    root     0     0   0 21:52:19 ?           0:06 sched
    root     1     0   0 21:52:22 ?           0:00 /sbin/init
    root     2     0   0 21:52:22 ?           0:00 pageout
    root     3     0   0 21:52:22 ?           0:01 fsflush
    root   432   376   0 22:31:05 console     0:00 ps -aef
    root     7     1   0 21:52:24 ?           0:03 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd
    root     9     1   0 21:52:24 ?           0:16 svc.configd
    root   394   385   0 22:00:00 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/saf/ttymon
  daemon   335     1   0 21:53:40 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/rpcbind
    root   340     1   0 21:53:40 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/keyserv
  daemon   279     1   0 21:53:27 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/crypto/kcfd
    root   376     7   0 21:59:59 console     0:00 -sh
    root   278     1   0 21:53:26 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/nscd
    root    79     1   0 21:52:46 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/sysevent/syseventd
    root   411     1   0 22:00:03 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd
    root   367     1   0 21:59:58 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/utmpd
    root   385     7   0 22:00:00 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/saf/sac -t 300
    root   389     1   0 22:00:00 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/syslogd
    root   395     1   0 22:00:00 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/inet/inetd start
    root   397     1   0 22:00:00 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/cron

As you can see, really only the bare minimum. This is also confirmed by our look at those network ports that are in use as reported by netstat -an:

# netstat -an

UDP: IPv4
   Local Address         Remote Address     State
-------------------- -------------------- -------
      *.111                                 Idle
      *.*                                   Unbound
      *.32772                               Idle
      *.514                                 Idle
      *.*                                   Unbound

TCP: IPv4
   Local Address        Remote Address    Swind Send-Q Rwind Recv-Q  State
-------------------- -------------------- ----- ------ ----- ------ -------
      *.*                  *.*                0      0 49152      0 IDLE
      *.111                *.*                0      0 49152      0 LISTEN
      *.*                  *.*                0      0 49152      0 IDLE


TCP: IPv6
   Local Address                     Remote Address                 Swind Send-Q Rwind Recv-Q   State      If
--------------------------------- --------------------------------- ----- ------ ----- ------ ----------- -----
      *.*                               *.*                             0      0 49152      0 IDLE

SCTP:
        Local Address                   Remote Address          Swind  Send-Q Rwind  Recv-Q StrsI/O  State
------------------------------- ------------------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -----------
0.0.0.0                         0.0.0.0                              0      0 102400      0  32/32  CLOSED

Active UNIX domain sockets
Address  Type          Vnode     Conn  Local Addr      Remote Addr
30001307e08 stream-ord 30001292a80 00000000 /var/run/.inetd.uds

As you can see, only a handful of ports are actually open by default on a system installed using the Reduced Networking Software Group. The ports open in the above example belonged to the rpcbind process (ports TCP/111, UDP/111, and UDP/32772) and the syslogd process (UDP/514). If you did not want these services running, you can disable them with the following commands:

# svcadm disable network/rpc/bind
# svcadm disable system/system-log

Alternatively, you could have also configured rpcbind to use TCP Wrappers by running the following commands:

# svccfg
svc:> select network/rpc/bind
svc:/network/rpc/bind> setprop config/enable_tcpwrappers = true
svc:/network/rpc/bind> quit
# svcadm restart network/rpc/bind:default

Certainly, you would then need to configure your TCP Wrappers hosts.allow(4) and hosts.deny(4) files accordingly. For syslogd, you could also have set the LOG_FROM_REMOTE parameter in the /etc/default/syslogd file to NO. This would have caused the syslogd process to not listen for incoming connections from remote hosts.

But I digress...

Now, since only 150-Mbytes of software was installed, it should come as no shock to you that there is a lot of other software that was not installed. This is why the Reduced Networking Software Group is a foundation for minimization. You will need to add any software packages (either manually or by defining them in your JumpStart installation profile) that you need for applications, services, management or support.

For example, let's look for some common programs and services to see what happens:

# echo $PATH
/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
# which telnet
no telnet in /usr/sbin /usr/bin
# which ftp
no ftp in /usr/sbin /usr/bin
# which rcp
no rcp in /usr/sbin /usr/bin
# which rsh
no rsh in /usr/sbin /usr/bin
# which ssh
no ssh in /usr/sbin /usr/bin
# which mount
/usr/sbin/mount
# mount -F nfs -o ro 10.1.1.100:/export/disk1 /mnt
mount: Operation not applicable to FSType nfs
# truss
truss: not found
# snoop
snoop: not found

As you can see, the Reduced Networking Software Group does not come with very much! It is precisely this reason however why it will help customers wishing to build minimal configurations. By providing a solid, core set of packages, customers are free to take an additive approach to building minimal systems by simply adding in those packages that they want or need. This approach is much improved from the typical method employed today that requires users to remove unnecessary software packages - as this approach was prone to error and often raised problems for the supportability of such configurations.

Since I believe that many people will want to have Secure Shell in their default configuration, I did want to provide the JumpStart installation profile entries that would help. If you would like Secure Shell (but do not care about tunnelling X11 connections), then you can use the following profile:

install_type    initial_install
cluster         SUNWCrnet
cluster         SUNWCssh add
package         SUNWgss  add
partitioning    explicit
filesys         rootdisk.s1     768     swap
filesys         rootdisk.s0     free    /
system_type     standalone

Well, that's all for now. Check back soon for another installment of lesser known and/or publicized security enhancements to the Solaris 10 OS. I still have a bunch lined up for you! Let me know what you think of this series of articles as well as ideas for future updates. Take care!

Technorati Tag:



How to Limit Display of Other User's Processes

Friday Sep 24, 2004

This entry is a continuation of my list of lesser known and/or publicized security enhancements to the Solaris 10 OS. In this update, I will be talking about how to restrict the output of the ps(1) command such that users can only see processes that they own. This is a very useful capability especially for ISPs and other organizations that do not want to allow users to see what other users are doing.

This new feature would not have been possible without the introduction of process privileges into the Solaris 10 OS. For a great overview of process privileges, see Casper Dik's blog entry on this topic. Be sure to read his article to get a more in depth understanding of process privileges.

So, before we begin, let's see what the output of ps -aef might look like for an average user (in this case, gmb):

$ ps -aef
     UID   PID  PPID   C    STIME TTY         TIME CMD
    root     0     0   0   Sep 23 ?           0:07 sched
    root     1     0   0   Sep 23 ?           0:01 /sbin/init
    root     2     0   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 pageout
    root     3     0   0   Sep 23 ?           2:31 fsflush
    root   393     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/auditd
    root     7     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:11 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd
    root     9     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:19 svc.configd
    root   176     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/syslogd
    root    64     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/nscd
  daemon    91     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:02 kcfd
    root   170     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:01 /usr/lib/utmpd
     gmb  1795  1792   0 22:17:26 pts/1       0:00 -sh
    root  1527     7   0 00:53:24 console     0:00 /usr/bin/login
    root    82     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/sysevent/syseventd
   smmsp   334     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/sendmail -Ac -q15m
  daemon   137     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:06 /usr/sbin/rpcbind
    root    84     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/picl/picld
    root  1601  1527   0 07:36:19 console     0:00 -sh
    root   181     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:04 /usr/lib/inet/inetd start
    root   281     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/mountd
    root   187     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/cron
    root  1402     1   0 00:26:14 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd
  daemon   289     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/nfsd
  daemon   264     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/statd
    root   303     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd
  daemon   268     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/lockd
    root   291     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/autofs/automountd
     gmb  1799  1795   0 22:17:28 pts/1       0:00 ps -aef
    root  1789   181   1 22:17:19 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/in.telnetd
    root  1792  1789   1 22:17:19 pts/1       0:00 login -p -h 10.1.1.100 -d /dev/pts/1
    root   335     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:06 /usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q15m
  daemon   296     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/nfsmapid

As you can see, the gmb user can see not only his processes but also those of the root, daemon, and smmsp accounts. We can change this behavior either globally or on a per-user basis. Just as we discussed in the Solaris 10 Account Lockout entry, we can use user-specific changes to force a subset of users to comply with some policy or use the user-specific changes to make exceptions for those users. The flexibility of this format allows it to be adapted quite easily to the needs of many organizations.

For our first example, we will illustrate how the global change can be made. So do this, we must edit the /etc/security/policy.conf file, uncomment the PRIV_DEFAULT entry and set its value as follows:

PRIV_DEFAULT=basic,!proc_info

For those not familiar with the proc_info privilege, you can find more information about it using the ppriv(1) command:

# ppriv -l -v proc_info
proc_info
        Allows a process to examine the status of processes other
        than those it can send signals to.  Processes which cannot
        be examined cannot be seen in /proc and appear not to exist.

This is all that you need to do to globally configure your Solaris 10 system so that users will only be able to see processes that they own. Note that this will obviously not apply to root who by default has all privileges or to other users or processes that have been explicitly given the proc_info privilege. Regardless, it is still a very quick and effective way to limit what processes users may see.

Returning to the gmb account example, I re-login to the system and again run the ps -aef command, but this time I receive different results:

$  ssh -l gmb sampleHost
gmb@sampleHost's password:
Last login: Fri Sep 24 22:25:18 2004 from 10.1.1.100
Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      s10_67  May 2004
$ ps -aef
     UID   PID  PPID   C    STIME TTY         TIME CMD
     gmb  1823  1819   0 22:30:17 pts/1       0:00 ps -aef
     gmb  1819  1815   0 22:30:14 pts/1       0:00 -sh
$

As you can see, the gmb user may now only see his own processes. Way cool. Next, to illustrate the per-user configuration ability, I will leave this global configuration in place and use the per-user configuration ability to allow the gmb user to view processes owned by other users. This is just an example of how exceptions can be implemented. The same process could be used to enable this feature for just a user or subset of users on the system.

To accomplish this task, we go back to the user_attr(4) file. In this file, we will modify the existing entry for the gmb user (or create one if one had not already been there). The following example illustrates the change that needs to be made. Specifically you need to add the defaultpriv entry to specify the default list of privileges that will be available to this user. By modifying this parameter, you will change the default set of privileges available to a user (by either adding or removing privileges as needed.) In this case, we are returning the user's default set of privileges to basic from basic,!proc_info.

gmb::::lock_after_retries=no;defaultpriv=basic

So, let's see if this really works. In the following example, we will confirm the configuration of the system, login to the system as the gmb user, and run the ps -aef command to verify that the gmb user can see processes owned by other users.

# grep "^PRIV_DEFAULT=" /etc/security/policy.conf
PRIV_DEFAULT=basic,!proc_info
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/user_attr
gmb::::lock_after_retries=no;defaultpriv=basic
# ssh -l gmb localhost
Password:
Last login: Fri Sep 24 22:37:55 2004 from 10.1.1.100
Sun Microsystems Inc.   SunOS 5.10      s10_67  May 2004
$ id -a
uid=100(gmb) gid=1(other) groups=1(other)
$ ps -aef
     UID   PID  PPID   C    STIME TTY         TIME CMD
    root     0     0   0   Sep 23 ?           0:07 sched
    root     1     0   0   Sep 23 ?           0:01 /sbin/init
    root     2     0   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 pageout
    root     3     0   0   Sep 23 ?           2:33 fsflush
    root   393     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/auditd
    root     7     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:11 /lib/svc/bin/svc.startd
    root     9     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:19 svc.configd
    root   176     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/syslogd
    root    64     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/nscd
  daemon    91     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:02 kcfd
    root   170     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:01 /usr/lib/utmpd
    root  1900  1402   7 22:42:05 ?           0:02 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd
    root  1527     7   0 00:53:24 console     0:00 /usr/bin/login
    root    82     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/sysevent/syseventd
   smmsp   334     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/sendmail -Ac -q15m
  daemon   137     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:06 /usr/sbin/rpcbind
    root    84     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/picl/picld
    root  1601  1527   0 07:36:19 console     0:00 -sh
    root   181     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:04 /usr/lib/inet/inetd start
    root   281     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/mountd
    root   187     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/sbin/cron
    root  1402     1   0 00:26:14 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd
  daemon   289     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/nfsd
  daemon   264     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/statd
    root   303     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/fm/fmd/fmd
  daemon   268     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/lockd
    root   291     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/autofs/automountd
     gmb  1912  1908   0 22:42:12 pts/1       0:00 ps -aef
    root   335     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:06 /usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q15m
  daemon   296     1   0   Sep 23 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/nfs/nfsmapid
     gmb  1908  1900   0 22:42:10 pts/1       0:00 -sh
    root  1899  1601   6 22:42:05 console     0:02 ssh -l gmb localhost

It worked! That was pretty easy, right? This is just one very small example of how you can use process privileges in your daily lives. I will try to add more interesting examples of practical uses for process privileges in the future.

Before ending, I do want to highlight that while these examples focused on the ps(1) command - other process related commands will also be impacted such as ptree(1), pcred(1), pmap(1), psig(1), etc. Further, as a user running without the proc_info privilege, you will not even be able to see other processes in the /proc directory:

$ id -a
uid=101(foo) gid=1(other) groups=1(other)
$ ppriv $$
1915:   -sh
flags = 
        E: basic,!proc_info
        I: basic,!proc_info
        P: basic,!proc_info
        L: all
$ ls -l /proc
total 4
dr-x--x--x   5 foo      other        832 Sep 24 22:52 1915
dr-x--x--x   5 foo      other        832 Sep 24 22:56 1932

I hope you enjoyed this article and please watch this space for new discussion of Solaris 10 security features. Take care and have a great weekend.

Technorati Tag:



Solaris 10 Account Lockout ("Three Strikes!")

Thursday Sep 23, 2004

The next item of my list of lesser known and/or publicized security enhancements to the Solaris 10 OS is account lockout. Account lockout is the ability of a system or service to administratively lock an account after that account has suffered "n" consecutive failed authentication attempts. Very often "n" is three hence the "three strikes" reference.

Recall from yesterday's entry on non-login and locked accounts that there is in fact a difference. Locked accounts are not able to access any system services whether interactively or through the use of delayed execution mechanisms such as cron(1M). So, when an account is locked out using this capability, only a system administrator is able to re-enable the account, using the passwd(1) command with the "-u" option.

Account lockout can be enabled in one of two ways. The first way will enable account lockout globally for all users. The second method will all more granular control of which users will or will not be subject to account lockout policy. Note that the account lockout capability will only apply to accounts local to the system. We will look at both in a little more detail below.

Before we look at how to enable or disable the account lockout policy, let's first take a look at how you configure the number of consecutive, failed authentication attempts that will serve as your line in the sand. Any number of consecutive, failed attempts beyond the number selected will result in the account being locked. This number is based on the RETRIES parameter in the /etc/default/login file. By default, this parameter is set to 5. You can certainly customize this parameter based on your local needs and policy. By default, the Solaris Security Toolkit will set the RETRIES parameter to 3.

Now that we know how to define how many consecutive, unsuccessful authentication attempts we will allow, let's take a look at how you can enable the account lockout policy globally. This policy can be altered using the LOCK_AFTER_RETRIES variable in the /etc/security/policy.conf file. Just as it sounds, if you set this parameter to YES, then the account lockout policy is enabled for all users on the system (unless there is a user override which we will talk about in a minute). By default, this parameter is set to NO which means that account lockout is not enabled.

So, let's try a simple example. First, I created a test account called gmb. Next, I set the LOCK_AFTER_RETRIES parameter in /etc/security/policy.conf to YES. To see, how this feature works, I attempted to authenticate to a system (and failed) using three different services:(1) TELNET, (2) FTP and (3) RLOGIN. I failed the login attempt for each of these services (in turn) twice with the exception of RLOGIN since after the fifth failed attempt the account was locked. I ran this test from the system's console so that the log messages could be injected into the output stream to give you a better idea of what was happening. Here is the actual log of the test that was run:

# telnet localhost
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
login: 
Connection to localhost closed by foreign host.
# ftp localhost
Connected to localhost.
220 sampleHost FTP server ready.
Name (localhost:root): gmb
331 Password required for gmb.
Password:
530 Login incorrect.
Login failed.
ftp> user gmb
331 Password required for gmb.
Password:
530 Login incorrect.
Login failed.
ftp> quit 221 Goodbye.
# rlogin -l gmb localhost Password:
Sep 23 23:23:47 sampleHost login: Excessive (5) login failures for gmb: locking account. Login incorrect
login: 

As you can see, after the fifth attempt, the gmb account was locked. This can also be verified by looking at the shadow(4) file entry for that account:

# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:*LK*R12OfCMPngtJQ:12685::::::5 

You can see that the account has been locked and that a record of the number of failures is available in the last column. From the shadow(4) manual page, the last field (called "flag") stores the failed login count in the low order four bits while reserving the remainder for future use. This means that you can also look at individual shadow(4) entries and see how many consecutive failed authentication attempts have been made per user. For example, you could do the following to see how many users have had failed authentication attempts since their last successful login:

# awk -F: '$NF >= 1 { print; }' /etc/shadow
gmb:*LK*R12OfCMPngtJQ:12685::::::5
foo:02YZb5ZaMrcrk:12685::::::2
bar:XF0Ggjq1c6tYQ:12685::::::1
baz:.VxOG4ytNE8es:12685::::::3

If a user who has had failed authentication attempts is finally able to successfully login to the system, that user will be presented with a message like:

# telnet localhost
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
login: baz
Password:
Warning: 3 failed login attempts since last successful login.
Last login: Thu Sep 23 23:36:44 from localhost

This warning message is available for interactive login services (not FTP) and is very helpful in providing warning to users who may not have been responsible for the failed authentication attempts. It is important that you educate your users to not simply ignore these messages as they could be a symptom of an ongoing attack on their account.

Also, note that once a user has successfully authenticated to a system, the failed login count is reset:

# grep "^baz" /etc/shadow
baz:.VxOG4ytNE8es:12685::::::

Note that the use of alternate authentication mechanisms such as rhosts or Secure Shell public key authentication will not reset the failed login count even on successful login. Should an account be locked however (either administratively or through the account lockout facility), the account would no longer be accessible even when using these alternate authentication methods. For example:

# grep gmb /etc/shadow
gmb:*LK*R12OfCMPngtJQ:12685::::::
# rsh -l gmb localhost /bin/finger
account expired

or for Secure Shell...

# ssh -l gmb -i /export/home/gmb/.ssh/id_dsa localhost
Enter passphrase for key '/export/home/gmb/.ssh/id_dsa':
Sep 24 00:34:59 sampleHost sshd[1504]: Failed publickey for gmb from 127.0.0.1 port 32801 ssh2
Password:

The second way in which account lockout can be configured is per-user in the /etc/user_attr file. Each user listed in the /etc/user_attr file can have an attribute defined called lock_after_retries. For a description of the format of this file, see the user_attr(4) manual page. By default, this value is set to no.

To configure account lockout for a specific user, simply add the lock_after_retries attribute with a value of yes. For example, let's assume you have an entry for user gmb:

gmb::::type=normal;profiles=FOO Security Management;roles=secadm

To enable account lockout, you simple change the above line to:

gmb::::type=normal;profiles=FOO Security Management;roles=secadm;lock_after_retries=yes

Let's take another view on this. Let's assume that the account lockout policy has been enabled globally using the method described above. You can then configure some users to be immune to this policy using this user-specific override. For example, if the LOCK_AFTER_RETRIES parameter was set to YES in /etc/security/policy.conf, but you did not want the policy to apply to the gmb account, then you only need to make sure that the /etc/user_attr file contains an entry for the gmb account that sets the lock_after_retries attribute to no as in:

gmb::::lock_after_retries=no

Here is an example of how this works. I will attempt to access the gmb account with an invalid password five times using TELNET. In contrast to the above example, the account should not be locked and no account locked message should be generated. First, let's confirm we have our system configured correctly for this test:

# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:h8HsRoqrne1oQ:12685::::::::::
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/user_attr
gmb::::lock_after_retries=no
# grep "^LOCK_AFTER_RETRIES=" /etc/security/policy.conf
LOCK_AFTER_RETRIES=YES

Now, let's see if the account actually gets locked after 5 failed authentication attempts.

# telnet localhost
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
login: gmb
Password:
Login incorrect
Sep 23 23:51:46 sampleHost login: REPEATED LOGIN FAILURES ON /dev/pts/1 FROM localhost, gmb
Connection to localhost closed by foreign host.
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:h8HsRoqrne1oQ:12685::::::

Just as expected, the gmb account is immune from the account lockout policy that applies to other users on the system. This is in fact what is implemented by default for the root account. That is, even if account lockout is enabled globally (which is not the default), the root account is still immune from being locked out. This is done to prevent a malicious user from locking the root account out of the system. If you would like this policy to apply to the root account, then simply change the value of the lock_after_retries parameter to yes in the /etc/user_attr file.

This concludes another installment. As always, I hope you find this information useful in understanding how some of the new Solaris 10 security enhancements work and how they can be applied to solve real-world problems in your environment.

Technorati Tag:



Managing Non-Login and Locked Solaris Accounts

Tuesday Sep 21, 2004

Today's entry will focus on enhancements to the passwd(1) command to better support the distinction between locked and non-login accounts. Specifically, we will be looking at the new -u and -N options to the passwd(1) command as well as how they relate to the much older -l option. These new capabilities will help administrators obtain better control over how their accounts are accessed and how they can in fact manage those accounts. In the past, some of the interfaces discussed below could only be achieved through manual editing of password files. The addition of these new command line options provides a much safer option for administrators to use.

While the distinction between non-login and locked accounts has existed in Solaris for many years, it became more pronounced in Solaris 9 where the semantics of locked accounts were more rigidly enforced.

Many customers noticed, for example, that locked accounts could no longer execute jobs using cron(1M). This problem was exacerbated by the fact that many commonly referenced security recommendation guides tell users to lock all of the accounts to which interactive access was not needed (which is most of the default accounts). When this was done, cron jobs for accounts such as "sys" (used for collecting system activity records) stopped working. This problem highlighted the intended difference between non-login and locked accounts and the need for additional interfaces to control them.

For those not already aware, a non-login account is one that must exist on the system (to provide a UID for example) but should not be allowed to login to a system interactively. That is, while a non-login account may be able to leverage delayed execution mechanism such as cron(1M), they cannot access the system using login(1), telnet(1) ftp(1), ssh(1), etc. Accounts that are non-login will have the token NP as their password. You can also identify non-login accounts using the passwd(1) command:

# passwd -s daemon
daemon    NL
# grep "^daemon:" /etc/shadow
daemon:NP:6445::::::

In this case, the daemon account has been configured as a non-login account.

A locked account on the other hand is one that is not permitted to access the system in any way - it is locked. A locked account differs from one marked as non-login in that locked accounts are not permitted to use delayed execution methods like cron(1M). Locked accounts are those whose password string has the prefix *LK*. Further, you can identify locked accounts using the passwd(1) command:

# passwd -s listen
listen    LK
# grep "^listen:" /etc/shadow
listen:*LK*:::::::

In this case, the listen account has been locked.

Here is a practical example. In this case, I will add a new account gmb to the system. By default, new accounts created using useradd(1M) are locked. After assigning a new password, I will demonstrate the use and result of the new -N and -u options to the passwd(1) command in addition to the -l option which has been around for ever.

First, let's create a test account called gmb. You will notice that by default the account will be locked.

# useradd -d /export/home/gmb gmb
# passwd -s gmb
gmb       LK

Next, a password will be assigned to the gmb account in the usual way using the passwd(1) command...

# passwd gmb
New Password:
Re-enter new Password:
passwd: password successfully changed for gmb
# passwd -s gmb
gmb       PS
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:Onk28eSYhYJ8s:12683::::::

You will notice that the "passwd -s" command now returns the keyword PS for "password set". If the account did not have a password defined, the keyword NP (for "no password") would have been returned.

Now that we have a password, let's lock the account and see what happens to the password string in /etc/shadow as well as to the output of "passwd -s":

# passwd -l gmb
passwd: password information changed for gmb
# passwd -s gmb
gmb       LK
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:*LK*Onk28eSYhYJ8s:12683::::::

You will notice that the account was in fact locked, but what is new in Solaris 10 is that the password string is not replaced with the "*LK*" value. Instead, a "*LK*" string prefix is prepended to the password so that the original value can be kept if desired. The great thing about this is that it does not depend on the password algorithm used. With the addition of flexible crypt in Solaris 9, you can replace the default crypt algorithm with either others provided by default in Solaris or one of your own and this new locking mechanism will still just work.

To unlock a locked account, you just use the new "-u" option to the passwd(1) command:

# passwd -u gmb
passwd: password information changed for gmb
# passwd -s gmb
gmb       PS
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:Onk28eSYhYJ8s:12683::::::

The account is now unlocked and the "*LK*" prefix has been removed from the user's password string. The last thing that we will look at today is how you create a non-login account. To do this, simply use the "-N" option to the password command:

# passwd -N gmb
passwd: password information changed for gmb
# passwd -s gmb
gmb       NL
# grep "^gmb:" /etc/shadow
gmb:NP:12683::::::

You will notice that the user's original password has been removed and replaced with the string "NP". This account is now a non-login account and the original password has been discarded. You will not be able to login to this account, but the account will be able to make use of delayed execution facilities. To re-enable an account for interactive logins, simply reassign a password to the account using the passwd(1) command.

That's all for this installment. I hope you find this kind of information useful. In future installments, I will continue to highlight some of the lesser known enhancements that contribute to Solaris security in the hopes of raising awareness and their use.

Technorati Tag:



And now for something completely different...

Tuesday Sep 21, 2004

It has been a while since my last update. It has certainly not been for lack of interest, however. Over the next few entries, I would like to talk about some of the lesser noted security enhancements that will be available in Solaris 10. Many of these enhancements are certainly minor when compared to N1 Grid Containers (zones), Service Management Facility (smf), and process privileges, but these enhancements nonetheless will help Solaris system and security administrators in their daily jobs - managing their systems and complying with their security policies.