Tuesday August 31, 2004 | Fingering->pointers Sudheendra Hangal's randomly updated weblog |
|
Solutions for problems or problems for solutions ? I've always found it easier to discover problems that fit a known non-trivial solution methodology than to find a solution for a fixed problem. If you know some cool way of doing stuff, keep your eyes and ears open and find a good problem which can use it: it's unlikely people have tried to apply the same technique to the problem. On the other hand, if you start with a fixed problem, the obvious approaches have already been tried and the problem has either been solved or is very hard. Carver Mead says the same thing in this interview (2004-08-31 07:05:10.0) Permalink here's a puzzle I asked our TSOtool team a few months ago: Let there be 2 contestants in an election, say W and Al, and Al wins by getting n votes to W's m votes (n > m). What is the probability that as each vote is counted, Al is always ahead of W ? i.e. after every step of the counting, Al has to have more votes than W. Assume votes are counted in random order. Never mind that W becomes president instead. (2004-08-19 23:26:24.0) Permalink
I was not aware of Henri Cartier-Bresson before his death, but |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||