Thursday Dec 21, 2006

Second Life discussion series starts in January

James Governor, founder of analyst firm RedMonk will join me in my Second Life home in January to discuss social networks, new business models for analyst firms, Second Life and a variety of other topics.  Specific date in January TBD, but will be toward the end of the month.  Please plan on joining us, and in the meantime, please comment here or via email with any topics you'd like to see discussed.  Feburary's guest is already lined up and will be very entertaining (but you'll have to wait a bit to learn who it will be ;)  )

 Link to my Second Life house

 


 

Saturday Dec 09, 2006

Ian Brown leaves Gartner?

Found on the H&K Blog.  Interesting if true.

"A reliable source has informed H&K that veteran analyst Ian
Brown, has left Gartner. Ian, who was a Research VP, has been a
prolific author of reports on servers and related technologies. He had
been with Gartner for the past twenty years.
"


Monday Nov 20, 2006

Nice blog entry from Sageza on Sun announcements

Sageza CEO, analyst Clay Ryder has a great post in his blog covering several Sun announcements such as open source Java and Blackbox  He also writes about a dinner he attended recently with execs from Sun, eBay and PG&E.  (The eBay exec ironically turned out to be my next door neighbor.)  What's interesting is how he ties the announcements together:

"All of these activities represent the kind of game changing marketing
that was historically associated with Sun.
More than just saying, “Ours
is better than yours” these announcements construct new opportunities
through efforts to create new markets as opposed to simply playing king
of the hill on tried and trued marketplaces. By emphasizing a new
approach to financing startups, Sun is quite possibly bringing new
customers into its fold that would likely otherwise have gone for the
white box, or highest discounted price available approach. With its
emphasis on energy efficiency and partnership with PG&E, Sun is
looking to change the rules by which products will be assessed, and has
brought in some creative outside financial incentives to help change
the playing field as well. By releasing Java under the GPL, the company
has finally changed its outmoded view that a key software should remain
under Copernican lock and key and has instead chosen to join open
community process with hopefully, further deployment of Java as a truly
priceless technology.

This kind of creative behavior, as also
noted with Project Blackbox, is a welcome return by Sun to its own
startup mentality of snarky, dynamic, and a historically smart
competitive playbook."


Illuminata look at online collaboration tools

Illuminata analyst Jonathan Eunice has a nice write up on his blog today covering online collaboration tools including a suite called Zoho.  I have not tried it yet, but may.  It looks quite interesting and includes docs, speadsheet, chat (all free) and CRM (fee).

Tuesday Nov 14, 2006

Another nice analyst blog on Open Source Java - Wohl

Anyone who follows Amy Wohl, one of the more influential open source focused analysts, knows that she's a big fan of the GPL and the open source community (as am I).  This positive write up is especially nice coming from her.

Read the whole entry here

"At last, after years of discussion, Sun has finally done it up right,
setting Java free not just to some form of Open Source, but to the
Open Source license, the GPL (V2).  Since we have beat up on Sun for
years, asking when and why not, it's only fair that we say, "Thank you,
Sun," and "Congratulations!"

Analyst firm Illuminata blogs on Open Source Java and Duke

Illuminata posted two nice write ups on the Open Source Java announcement on their blog yesterday.  One entry looks at the core announcement around Java being released under GPLv2, the other entry is dedicated to open source Duke.  If you're not a regular reader of Illuminata Perspectives, this is one to add to your news reader.

IT Analysts blog on Open Source Java - Redmonk

There were over 300 (!) media stories yesterday on Sun's announcement around Open Source Java.  Along with the bevvy (did I spell that right??) of news coverage, there was also some more in depth postings by top IT Analysts.  Even nicer, some of these writeups were not in the form of paid analyst reports, but blog entries.  I'm a big fan of IT analyst blogging.  In my opinion, it allows analysts to showcase their style, writing quality, etc. whilst inviting readers to get to know them better (i.e. become clients).

One entry comes from analyst firm RedMonk.  Stephen O'Grady has written up a nice summary/commentary on the announcement in Q&A format.  He closes by saying, "kudos to the Sun folks for their hard work here, of course, but I doubt
they'll hear my little thanks amidst the sea of thank you's they're
receiving right now."


 

Sunday Nov 05, 2006

It's all in how you say it...

An analyst, who does not have a blog, asked me to post the following rant.  I think it goes nicely with the theme of communications since it addresses the apparently radically different ways two companies -one large, one small- interact with their customers.


Separately, I started thinking about the issue of "voice" and how sometimes you can tell who wrote something just by the tone.  Any ideas which analyst wrote this?


I am enraged. I am pissed off about soda. Well, mainly, I’m pissed off about companies that present themselves as paragons of product excellence and customer care. I won’t name the company in question, I’m above that kind of pettiness (their name rhymes with “Lhomas Lemper”) and I’m not looking to cause them any problems (they are based in the Pacific Northwest, a city that has a Space Needle). I’m simply using my recent experience with them to illustrate larger points concerning hypocrisy, fatuousness, and other words that I don’t want to take the time to learn. Here’s my story:



Over the past several months, our family has become enamored with the sodas produced by this company – particularly their root beer and grape soda flavors. Being a typical suburban guy, if I like something, I want to have it continuously available. To that end, I made a trip to Costco (a very good company, BTW) to stock up for the holiday season, filling our garage refrigerator in the process. Last week, I moved a six pack of grape soda from the garage to the main reefer in the kitchen. I noticed that some of the bottle caps were chipped and bent and, upon further examination, found that the bottles were only half to three quarters full. Thinking this was strange, and certainly something the company would want to know about, I sent them an email with a subject line of: “Product quality/tampering issue?”. In the email, I explained the situation and provided full contact information. When a couple of days passed without contact, I decided to give them a call. Their automated voicemail system must have been spec’d out by someone who had totally committed to a vow of silence. They had many options, but the product quality selection brought me to a menu that required me to input a specific name in order to be connected. Dialing 0 did not bring up an operator; in fact, I couldn’t get a live person at all. After many minutes of frustration, I left a message outlining my problem in their general voicemail box. My last words were “I’m not trying to beat you out of free soda, I’m just trying to alert you to a potential problem. But if you don’t care about your product quality, then I don’t either.”



A few more days have passed since that message and I’ve yet to be contacted by the company. Some might say that I shouldn’t expect them to jump on this – after all, they’re only human and they must get a lot of this type of thing. But I’d like to relate another story along the same lines to illustrate the difference between these pious a-holes and a real company that puts their “customer first” money where their mouth is (or something equally pithy). About six months ago, I purchased a 12 pack of Coke Classic from my local grocery store. When I got home and poured myself a glass, I noticed that both the carbonation and taste were off – not horrible, but bad enough to send it into the sink. I opened another can and found the same thing. I went to the Coke website and sent them an email explaining the situation. To my great surprise, I received a return email within 12 hours, asking me for the product batch codes, date of purchase, etc. I provided the info and figured the matter was closed. But no, we weren’t done…my phone rang the next day and I was greeted by a Coke customer service rep looking for more details and offering up an apology. I received yet another call telling me what the problem was (the grocer took a bunch of loose cans and repackaged them into another 12-pack – against Coke policy) and offering me a replacement. I was bowled over by their attention and dedication to product quality and customer service. Which explains why I am so angry about a small company who boasts that they “…brew every one of our sodas using only the finest ingredients available” and that “every batch is truly brewed from scratch” the subsequently screws up on the quality and service piece of the business. If you’re going to up the ante by an implied superiority to bigger, more impersonal rivals, then you’d better well live up to it!  There’s a lesson in there somewhere for someone, but I’ve expended my rage and am tired of typing….


Bonus round:


Anyone remember which analyst said, "HP is toast." earlier this year? 


 


Archives
Links
Referrers
Search

More Stuff

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to Google

Subscribe in Rojo

View Catherine Helzerman's profile on LinkedIn

Locations of visitors to this page