Monday Dec 22, 2008
Monday Dec 22, 2008
This is a screen capture of a report generated in Omniture v13.5. I'm not sure how I caught this. The last item in the graph legend is orange, while it is brown in the summary. On the actual graph, the item was orange.
BTW - When will Omniture provide greater graphing capability? I really liked the introduction of bar graphs in v14. And I have to say, unless I need a bar graph, I still use v13.5.
Monday Jul 28, 2008
Ominous-ture
A bad feeling that Omniture is losing sight of it's customers basic needs.
Of, the feeling you get knowing the "this document contains no data" error is about to pop-up.
Ok, my teammates would probably refer to my mood right now as "snarky".
Wednesday Apr 16, 2008
So I've been using the new Omniture Suite for about a week. I haven't been won back yet.
More belly-aches:
I know of many Omniture users who have decided to stick with Omniture 13.5 until the bugs are worked out. It looks like I'll be joining their camp. If Omniture gets these issues resolved they'll be back on track to winning me back, but until then it's back to Omniture 13.5 with me.
Friday Apr 04, 2008
Today I finally decided to make the upgrade from Omniture 13.5 to Omniture 14, AKA Omniture Suite. I have to say, they may have won me back. For a while there I was getting quite annoyed with them being called the leading web analytics vendor when they were taking soooo long to add much needed web 2.0 features (not to mention statistically correct graphs).
Here are some of the wonderful things I've found in my first day in the Omniture Suite, specifically in SiteCatalyst:
Of course, there are some things that befuddle me (hopefully just due to the learning curve):
Wednesday Jan 02, 2008
I ran across something very interesting while poking around Google Analytics Map Overlay report last night. If you display the Map Overlay by continent, you'll be very surprised to find out that Google wants you to believe there are only six continents: the Americas, Europe (which contains Russia?), Africa, Asia (which should contain Russia), and Oceania (which is apparently Australia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oceania). And, of course, they left out Antarctica, which is probably fine. But there probably is internet access in Antarctica, so why leave the researchers out? I was never aware of this, but there are different views on how many continents there are - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent#Number_of_continents. However, in all of these, Russia is always part of Asia. And as for the use of Oceania, according to Wikipedia, "The names Oceania or Australasia are sometimes used in place of Australia. For example, the Atlas of Canada names Oceania,[10] as does the model taught in Latin America and Iberia."
Any ideas on why they're confused?