A Web Analyst's Perspective
It's Not METRICS!
Archives
« November 2009
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
       
Today

Click me to subscribe Subscribe!

Search

Links
 

Today's Page Hits: 35

« Tracking Promotional... | Main | Web Analysts: Take... »
Thursday Mar 22, 2007
Campaign IDs & SEO

I ran across something interesting last night.  A Google search for "site:developers.sun.com/ajax/" returned two entries for the homepage.  One was a standard entry that I expected.  However, the second displayed the URL with a campaign ID (CID) appended (developers.sun.com/ajax/index.jsp?cid=216424).  Apparently, the Googlebot followed a link placed as part of a campaign that was being tracked through our web analytics software.

As we all know, Google frowns upon duplicate content and ranks pages lower for this.  I'm not sure if this is considered duplicate content, but seeing duplicate entries makes me think so.  To remedy this, I suggest coding CID URLs so that search engines will ignore them.  To do this, insert the following attribute inside the <a href...> tag:  rel="nofollow".

On the other hand, what if the placement is on a high ranking page that you want Google to know about?  (When your link shows up on a high ranking page, this improves your page rank in Google).  This is something you will have to test. to find out which weighs heavier - the negative impact of duplicate content or the positive impact of a high page rank link.

Happy optimizing! 

Posted at 02:02PM Mar 22, 2007 by dustinwallace in Search Engine Optimization (SEO)  |  Comments[3]

Comments:

I wouldn't worry about that too much. If Google really did treat those two URLs as duplicates which should be penalized, anyone could easily hurt their competitors by linking to them with bogus (but functional) parameterized URLs. For example, notice that this URL brings up Red Hat's usual home page: http://www.redhat.com/?killtheirpagerank=please. Something tells me that Google's algorithms are smarter than that.

Posted by Jamey Wood on March 22, 2007 at 08:52 PM PDT #

Interestingly enough, one of our search experts looked up the Google page rank of these pages and the URL with the CID ranks 4/10 while the orignal URL ranks 0/10. Also, if you try http://java.sun.com/ajax (which redirects to the original page) its rank is 6/10. Go figure.

Posted by Dustin Wallace on March 22, 2007 at 10:27 PM PDT #

Don't worry about it - google's algorithms is smart enough to pick it up

Posted by catering melbourne on October 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed