|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FEEDS SEARCH LINKS CONTACT jaya_hangal Template by Helquin |
Monday Dec 22, 2008
AACS- how it works and its attacks
Here is a brief overview of AACS, a DRM mechanism used in Blu-ray disk and HD DVD.The algorithm used for (Cryptographic) Key Distribution and Revocation process is core to the AACS security. Naturally, a good amount of effort has been put into making this mechanism better in AACS taking into account that it was broken in CSS(Content Scrambling System). CCS is used in DVDs and has led to the failure of DRM enforcement on them.
How AACS works:
AACS uses a popular algorithm called Subset Difference Revocation (SDR) for key assignment and revocation. SDR has led to many papers in the Crypto conference. Many of them are variants or enhancements over the basic SDR algorithm.
In the SDR algorithm, cryptographic keys (used for encryption) are represented as a complete(full) binary tree. For AACS, a tree with 32 levels is used. That means 232 unique keys are generated.
The leaf nodes of this tree represent both hardware and software devices. The keys assigned to the leaf nodes are called device keys. Each device stores a subset of keys from the binary tree. The subset of keys is formed in such a way that only devices whose keys are not revoked are able to decrypt the content. In other words, the revoked devices, even if they all collude won't be able to decrypt the content using their keys. This is the core of Subset Difference Revocation method. In Figure 1, a simple binary tree is shown. The leaf nodes n8 – n15 represent the devices. Ki,j means the key associated with node nj assigned with subtree rooted at ni.
For example, the device n8 stores the keys: k1,3 k2,5 and k4,9. Here, k4,9 is the keys associated with node n9, assigned with subtree rooted at n4. Note that the keys stored in device n8 are associated with its ancestor's siblings all the way up the root of the tree- n9, n5 and n3.
Figure 1
Diving one more step into the details of how this works, the subset of keys on a device (referred to as device keys) are not directly used in encrypting the media content. They are used in deriving a key called "Media Key" which is used in content encryption. The media key is encrypted using a carefully formed subset of device keys. A new media key is generated for each title just like a new secret key generated in each SSL session.
The content on the disk is encrypted as below:
[n1, n2, …,nm], Ek1 (K), Ek2 (K), … , Ekm(K) | EK(M)
Where, n1, …,nm are subset of nodes of the binary tree, whose keys k1, …,km are used for encrypting the media key K. The content M is encrypted using the media key K.
Note,
the subset of nodes is formed in such a way that the non-revoked leaf
nodes can derive one of the keys ki from the set: k1,.. ,km using
node information ni from the set: n1,..,nm.
In Figure 1, the media key is encrypted using the set: {k1,3 k1,2}
Here is an interesting part of the SDR algorithm when a device is compromised, its keys need to be revoked. The subset of keys associated with a device or a leaf node includes keys for its ancestor's siblings but not the key associated with itself or its ancestors all the way up to the root of the tree. The subset of keys for the leaf nodes in the binary tree of Figure 1 is shown at the bottom of the tree. Also, using GGM algorithm, described later, given a root key K, it is possible to derive the keys for its left child KL and its right child KR. A leaf node in the binary tree is able to derive keys for all the nodes in the subtrees rooted at its ancestors but not its own key or its ancestor's keys.
Figure 2
When a device needs to be blocked from decrypting the media key, the key corresponding to that device is used for encrypting the media key. That's because the revoked device cannot derive its own key.When there are multiple devices that need to be blocked, a subset of keys is formed such that only non revoked nodes are able to decrypt the media key. In Figure 2, nodes n8, n9, n12, n14 are marked as revoked. According to SDR algorithm, the following set of keys is used for encrypting the media key: {k2,4 k6,12 k7,14} For more information on SDR algorithm please refer to this presentation.
Device keys:
Device
keys are assigned by AACS LA. A set of device keys may either be unique per device(they do are unique on each hardware player), or used commonly by multiple
devices (typically the software players distributed by a specific software vendor carry
same set of device. It is expected
that each device or player manufacturer treat these keys as highly confidential.
AACS uses 128-bit AES keys as opposed to 40-bit DES keys used by CCS
in DVD.
What
is GGM?
The
algorithm to determine the set of keys (to be held the device) need
to take into consideration:
of
times a decryption is performed. In
addition to using SDR algorithm, a key generation techniue called GGM
(Goldreich, Goldwasser & Micali) is used. This technique helps in keeping a small subset
of keys that are stored on each device and a short encrypted header (for retrieving the media
key).
Given
a key K for the root node, one can derive KL
-key for the
left child and KR
-the key for the right child. AACS
Attacks: First
report: The
first attack was reported by a programmer, who identified himself as
Muslix64, announced in
the Internet discussion forum Doom9 on Dec. 18 2006. This programmer
said he has successfully
copied movies distributed in the HD-DVD format. Decryption keys were
extracted from
a weakly protected player (WinDVD). In
an accompanying video demonstration posted on the YouTube Web site,
the programmer showed
encryption keys for six movies (this video is not accessible any
more).
--Source
NY Times (Jan 1st 2007) Second
Report: SlySoft,
an Antigua-based company that sells software to defeat various forms
of copy protection, updated
its AnyDVD (a commercial) product to allow it to copy the new AACS
discs.
Apparently, SlySoft had extracted a key from a different player and had kept the attack a
secret.
They waited until all other compromised keys were blacklisted before switching to the
new one.
And they came out openly 6 days after the new discs came out with updated keys :)
Why
Revocation has not worked as expected in AACS? After
noticing the complexities surrounding AACS, the question that bothers
is that, if some of the keys
are exposed by hackers why isn't there a
mechanism to revoke those keys and move on? There
seems to be a deployment problem with the way revocation works now: AACS
license agreements allow 90 days for the player vendors to update the
revoked keys, which
is considered to be a very long period, that puts AACS and the
studios in trouble.
The
website: http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1158
points out that that -
“at this point, Hollywood has released four generations of AACS-encoded discs, each encrypted with
different secret keys. The industry is stuck on a treadmill: AACS
changes keys every ninety days, and
attackers promptly reverse-engineer the new keys and carry on
decrypting the discs.
And they wait and then publicly release the keys one by one, after a new disc has come out with
different set of keys.
To
be successful in the long run, AACS needs to out pace such attacks.
Its backers might be able
to accelerate the blacklisting cycle somewhat by revising their agreements with player manufacturers,
but the logistics of mastering discs and shipping them to market mean
the shortest practical turnaround time will be at least several weeks.
Attackers don’t even have to wait this long before they start to crack another player.
Like Slysoft, they can extract keys from several players and keep some of them secret until
all publicly known keys are blacklisted. Then they can release the other keys one at a time the
to buy additional time. “
While, AACS is the only protection that HD-DVD, Blu-ray claims that BD+ can further enhance Blu-ray
disk security. Below is some information gathered from the web on BD+.
What
is BD+ ? BD+
lets Blu-ray Discs install and run a piece of encryption software on the player, allowing each title
to have it's unique encryption scheme. Hacking into a protected disc only affects that single
copy, it won't cause security breaches across the board for the same title.
BD+ can detect tampering to a player, refusing to play once the intrusion is discovered.
Sony and other studios that support Blu-ray believe this technology produces a secure,
yet user friendly product that only punishes hackers for copy right violations.
BD+ was developed by Cryptography Research Inc. and is based on their Self-Protecting Digital
Content concept. BD+ is effectively a small virtual machine embedded in authorized players.
It allows content providers to include executable programs on Blu-ray Discs.
On November 19 2007, Macrovision announced that it planned to acquire the SPDC technology
(including patents and software code) from CRI for US$45 million in cash plus stock warrants.
On
November 8, 2007, SlySoft announced that they had completely cracked BD+. This turned
out to be not quite correct however. The crack allowed a user to copy a BD to the hard drive and
play it back from there using only a specific version of Cyberlink's PowerDVD, but
not to transcode, otherwise manipulate the content or play it back from a burned BD-R or BD-RE.
References:
http://www.aacsla.com/
(AASC spec)
http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~naor/PAPERS/stateless.ppt (SDR
Algorithm) http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1158 (discussion
on AACS attacks)
Posted at
04:44PM Dec 22, 2008
by jaya_hangal in Java |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||