Tuesday May 10, 2005

I've heard of trying to get slashdotted to generate traffic, but this title is getting a bit obvious, don't you think? The URL contains "sun_buys_tarantella", a noticable difference from the title. Could it be the editorial process?

I'll call it slashbait which, of course, is not to be confused with slashbait. "Slashbait" sounds familiar, but Google doesn't come up with anything of substance on the topic (Google: slashbait slashdot).

Come to think of it, one or two of the early Clingan Zone posts were (unsuccessful) attempts at slashbait. I admit it. No, this entry is *not* an attempt at slashbait :) I've ... ummm ... "matured" since then. Well, not entirely.

FWIW, I enjoy Ashlee's work overall.

Dave is showing some positive progress on his Sun Ray at home project. If you take away what most home users use PC's for and buy a PS2 instead (and save $2000 in the progress), the Sun Ray at home is starting to look very interesting. Dave is proving that it is a cost effective and flexible solution compared to managing multiple PC's.

I say go for the v40z and charge your neighbors for Sun Rays and the extra headroom. It is much better than being the neighborhood PC sysadmin :)

Hey, Tim Marsland is blogging about layering Solaris on Xen!

Anyone else interested in participating?? Let Tim know!

Roumen has a good blog entry on mapping the Gartner hype curve to a Java IDE Memegraph. Neat-o.

Ever feel you are looking over your shoulder? I feel that every time I use my wife's Windows laptop. Fresh off the shelf with the latest revision of Windows XP, it didn't take long for it to soak up 5+ spyware applications and slow to a crawl. It somewhat explains why everyone wants 3+ Ghz desktops. Hey, we have a use for that 2nd CPU core now. For running spyware! How can such a "modern" operating system come off the shelf sssoooo insecure? "Modern" is quoted because there is an expectation of security in a networked world. Throwing punches at Windows is easy, but most operating systems have their holes as well (although other OS's take security more seriously IMHO). After using the iMAC and Linux/Java Desktop System for a couple of years now, I have yet to have a security breach (that I know of :) ). While they are not as big a target, this is a bit worrisome.

As a result of reading this this article, here is a question for my fellow bloggers. Would you take ZERO new features for a year if vendors focused on nothing but security? Some may consider that a step backwards. Some as a step forward. I would see it as one giant leap for mankind.

We have this great platform called "Java" that addresses the network security issues to a large degree. More developers should leverage Java if not for security alone. Anyone remember the HotJava browser? What a great browser. It's downfall? It actually rendered valid HTML. And only valid HTML. All that bad HTML out there helped kill the HotJava browser. What was nice about the HotJava browser was that it downloaded it's "plugins" on-the-fly with those "plugins" complying with the Java security sandbox model. That was before the Java 2 fine grained security model as well. Imagine only allowing file writes to the cache directory and "file download" directory. Cool. Wish we could bring back the HotJava browser. Then I could browse in peace, regardless of operating system. This is in no means a knock against my current browser, FireFox. I just feel safer with Java. My 2 cents.