« Improving the open... | Main | The Internet and... »

20051008 Saturday October 08, 2005

Google, OpenOffice and StarPortal

At the joint Sun/Google announcement, reporters, analysts and end users alike were hoping to hear about OpenOffice delivered as a web service. As a disclaimer, I know about as much about the google/Sun announcement as the rest of you. I watched the announcement and that's about it. Don't read anything in to this blog entry beyond nostalgia.

Does anyone remember StarPortal?, AKA the Sun One Webtop? George does. George basically asks "What does it mean to deliver OpenOffice as a web service?" and, in an agreeably dubious manner, asks proponents to actually use such solutions.

I remember StarPortal very, very well. In fact, I went off to internal training on it. It was really cool. Here is a presentation that has a couple of slides on StarPortal, not to mention the "We are the Dot in Dot COM" :) What StarPortal did very well was deliver content based on the capability of the device the user had access to. I took the liberty of installing all N tiers on one of my servers. StarPortal contained a user document repository where I kept many of my presentations. What was cool was that I could log in and deliver presentations (or read documentation) pretty much where ever I was. StarPortal had a Java front end (not back end) to render in a GUI in a browser. It also generated a PDF on-the-fly from that same content. Don't have PDF? How about generate HTML? Don't have a web browser? That is where it got really cool.

Back then I had a wireless Palm VII (circa 1999-2000). From the Palm I could render the simple content (I can't recall the details). The primary value was being able to email or fax the document to the closest devices so that content could then be presented. It really was cool and, more importantly, usable (although it did need some attainable work).

It is for these reasons that I somewhat disagree with George that that StarPortal was an utter failure. I think that is overstated. Technology was not the problem, IMHO. Is it something users wanted? With the dot-bomb, we never really found out. So I'll ask myself George's question if I would eat my own dogfood in the case of StarPortal. I actually think I would. Bandwidth and JVM improvements will have made the experience that much better. As you probably know, I'd prefer to go whole-hog and put the entire desktop over the web, albeit with an ultra-thin SunRay instead of the Wyse terminal George talks about (thin is relative). Someday.

(2005-10-08 10:20:05.0) Permalink Comments [2]

Trackback URL: http://blogs.sun.com/jclingan/entry/google_openoffice_and_starportal
Comments:

I've also been thinking about Starportal since the announcement. It was really cool to have an Office in a Browser but, let's face it, the products wasn't really very good at the time. Of course that now, Sun and Google could pick up the pace and make the product a killer. That's an advantage of betting in a company that has over 20 years of investment. Chances are that yesterday's failed project will be tomorrows next big thing.
One think I think Sun should take from that article, SunRays cost to much money and, that consists has a barrier to enter when someone is testing the technology.

Posted by Jaime Cardoso on October 08, 2005 at 05:11 PM PDT #

This is perhaps a bit late in terms of comments now that Sun and Google have quashed rumors of a hosted version of OpenOffice. Yes, it doesn't make sense. It may make sense for a proprietary Office package that costs money to license so users can "take it with them" when using other computers. With the free OpenOffice package it is free and simple to just install it on any computer as you need it. I actually carry a CD with OpenOffice and OpenSource Windows apps with me to install whenver I need to use OO.o or another OpenOffice app. In every case, the owners of the computers I've borrowed have asked me to leave the software on the computer, which because it is free, I can legally do. Some have even burned copies of my OpenSource Apps CDs right on the spot for their use. They are understandably thrilled when I advise them that they can legally make as many copies as they want and install it on as many computers as they want. But, I digress. The real value of having an online OpenOffice is not having the program hosted online, but having the program access resources online: Templates, Clip Art libraries, Dictionaries, Thesauruses, and most importantly, user documents. If I can access my OO.o, or OpenDocument files, online through a locally installed OpenOffice program, that would have incredible value for me! This is where I believe the Sun-Google Alliance is headed. OO.o being free will be ubiquitous, even if it isn't, installing it is a simple procedure from a CD that users could carry. Being able to access YOUR documents, templates, digital assets (clip arts, etc.), from any connected computer with OpenOffice is the killer app!

Posted by Maccess on November 02, 2005 at 10:54 PM PST #

Post a Comment:

Name:
E-Mail:
URL:

Your Comment:

HTML Syntax: NOT allowed