To my knowledge, there are only a few people from my graduate program who have published their work at either the ACM CHI conference or the UPA conference. Some of my friends from the program have asked me to give them advice, so here's what I have:
- Trying is the first part of doing. This is the mantra that I use with my daughter, and we find it very empowering. As the Maryland lottery tag line used to say, "You've got to play to win." You won't get published unless you write and submit.
- Get your article peer-reviewed before you submit. Ask people whom you know to review your article. They will point out where you are vague, where you need to provide specifics, and what other issues you need to address. I generally ask 3 or 4 people (colleagues, teachers, friends at other companies) to peer review the article, and to subsequently review changes that I've made based on their suggestions.
- Appreciate your reviewers. Ask the people who peer-reviewed your paper what is their favorite flavor of chocolate (white, dark, or milk?) or wine (red or white? which grape? Merlot? Pinot Nior? Zinfindel?). And then deliver -- I usually buy $5 or $10 of chocolate from the Lindt store or Godiva store, and when I buy a bottle of wine, I spend between $10 and $20 (and deliver it in a gift bag). The last time I dropped off a bottle of wine to say "thank you for reviewing an article" that had subsequently been rejected, the meeting led to a panel proposal that may take us to Florence, Italy, in April :)
- Well-written articles are more easily accepted. When I was working on my first paper for publication, my co-author had lots of publication experience. She admitted in frustration that a certain percentage of articles would be published not because they had remarkable findings, but because they were well written. I thought "Then this is going to be a very well-written paper!" -- organization, and clarity of thought count.
- Work with someone who has already published. This technique allows you to benefit from their experience, and to get some unofficial mentoring.
- Collaborate. I've always said that writing is best played as a team sport. It can sometimes be frustrating to work with co-authors, but I have always felt that the work benefited from their insights and input.
- Title your paper appropriately. A misleading title can take your reviewers down the wrong path, which we know leads to confusion, anxiety, and anger: three emotions that you don't want your reviewers to be feeling :) Likewise,
- Ensure that your abstract and conclusion sections are the best-written parts of the paper, because, as former graduate students, we know that often those sections are the only part of a paper that are read. And those sections determine whether a reader will look at the material in between them.
- Rejection does not equal failure. Clearly, it's not fun, but the more writing that you do, the more likely you are to get rejected. Take the comments that you receive seriously, consider that you may have written something that is more in line with another publication's audience or style, and try again. The world is full of stories of how innovators' disruptive ideas were rejected.
- Publication does not equal perfection. Don't wait for your article to be perfect. Write it. Have it reviewed. Revise it. And then submit it. Get out there, and do it -- trying is the first part of doing!
Good luck!
Today, we are (yes
CEC is a much larger conference, because Sun Service is a bigger group than our population of Distinguished Engineers, Technical Directors, and Sun Fellows. CEC used to be hosted every year out of San Francisco, but this year, it's being run in Las Vegas. I've never been to Las Vegas, but the reviews I've heard so far are all good.
I just hope that the reviewers for the
And speaking of today, I turned 40 a little while ago ... sometime around 6:30am in Austin, TX. My mom says that there were three tornadoes over the hospital at the time, as a result of a
I've admitted that
It's been a very tough week at work, but
A couple years ago, a colleague and I hosted an afternoon "tea" in Sun Labs. Essentially, volunteers bring in snacks one afternoon a week, which gives everyone a good reason to come out of their offices and informally chat. That day, I'd made guacamole from scratch. It was awesome, and I was asked to share the recipe. I was a bit nervous, because, as a writer, I knew I'd have to give proper attribution to the author of the recipe (Al Roker, in his
which is not really the same, because there's a black button on the "back" of the faucet, which now faces front. Every time I see that black dot, I grimace. It's interfering with my enjoyment of the beauty of the faucet (experienced utility).
There are a number of aspects to effective communication — I mentioned how and when you ask for a promotion in an
I have two