Tuesday Oct 11, 2005

Here's Simon Phipps on open source -- Sun Weaving Open Source into Corporate Culture:

“Open Sourcing is a non-traditional concept, and although Sun has done more with open development than any other company, still we’ve got a lot of employees and they all haven’t absorbed Sun’s heritage,” Phipps said. Open Source is not about giving stuff away for free. Open Source is about collaborative development, inside and outside the company.”

Works for me.
Paul Murphy has a nice piece on the media's reaction to some of Sun's recent hardware announcements -- A deafening silence: the media on Sun. Paul's view is that Sun put out some pretty good stuff recently, the media basically yawned, and customers are not getting the best information as a result.

While my default position traditionally has been to agree with this view, I'm not sure it matters that much anymore. There are so many places to get your information now, the media being just one. Some of it is garbage, true, but other stuff really quite good. Besides, I read some pretty good coverage from those launches as well. Coverage on Sun is mixed right now, whereas just a little while ago it was all pretty dark. My goodness ... remember all that "Sun setting" stuff out there? So, we're getting better -- the coverage is improving. But we've made some pretty big changes in the company the last two years, and it will take more time for the press to catch up. I think this will all be reflected in the coverage in the future if we execute on all these new products and strategies. Look, bad coverage and competitive attacks used to really bother me. It doesn't anymore. I now view it as all just conversation. At this point, I feel like I can respond to some stuff to make a point if I want to and let other stuff just pass as if I had never seen it. The choice is 100 percent mine, and I exercise it with pretty much zero consistency. Paul's piece is compelling and detailed, and I can see he gets where we are going. So he's probably a bit ahead of the game.
Check out this headline -- Sun to pull plug on Trusted Solaris. Wow. Sounds bad, right? Well, the article -- which reads really well, actually -- is not necessarily consistent with the headline. Here are just a few graphs:

Sun Microsystems Inc. plans to phase out its Trusted Solaris secure operating system and replace it with security extension software that can be used with its Open Solaris operating system, said Mark Thacker, product line manager of Solaris security.

Open Solaris and the Solaris Trusted Extensions software will provide the full functionality of Trusted Solaris, according to Thacker.

“This product will simply layer on top of Solaris 10. It will run on top of any piece of hardware that Solaris 10 runs on,” Thacker said. Trusted Extensions should be available by mid-2006.

<snip>

The reason behind the rearrangement is to consolidate the code base for Solaris, according to Thacker. Trusted Solaris has a different operating system kernel than the more widely used Solaris 10, though the two are similar.

Now, that tells a somewhat different story, don't you think? So, how about a new headline? How about this: "Sun Upgrades Trusted to Solaris 10." It's simple. It still fits on one line. There's a  little play on the words "Trusted" and "Solaris" in there. I like it. Ok, I'm no headline writer, but you get the point.
Irving Wladawsky-Berger, a vice president at IBM comments on OpenSolaris in AME Info -- IBM's top Linux expert:

Q: How do you think Sun moving Solaris to open source will affect the Linux momentum?

A: That's a very interesting question. In my mind, the key to an open-source project is the quality of the community behind it.

When we at IBM choose to join an open-source community, whether it is Linux, grid, Apache or-more recently-the Geronimo community that's building an open Web application server based on Apache, it's the quality of the community that drives the decision. How good are the people? How diverse are they? What kind of resources do they have? The better the community, the more likely we are to join it.

Now that's very different from a vendor saying they're going to let other people look at their source code. Because, by and large, the only people interested in a proprietary product are the existing people who work with it. And even then, the product wasn't designed to be worked on by people outside of the company.

So it's difficult to look at that. That's a long way of saying I don't see the Solaris move as coming anywhere near to the community that Linux has built up. It'll probably be of value to some parts of the Solaris ecosystem, so it's probably a good step for Sun, but I honestly doubt that you'll see the large numbers of smart people in other companies and universities help build this offering like they do with grid, Apache and Linux.

Some really nice comments in that first paragraph of Irving's respond about communities and the high quality of people that gather around great source code. We're doing just that with OpenSolaris -- building a community of really talented developers and evangelists who love this code base. So, I agree. With that part, anyway.
Scott in the Wall Street Journal today -- The 'Open Inbox':

Sun Microsystems Inc. co-founder and CEO Scott McNealy, 50, receives about 150 employee emails a day, some of them keeping him updated about what competitors are doing and about evolving industry standards for high-tech products. He says many of his responses are "pretty brief." How brief? As in one word: "Thanks."

Of course Scott answers our emails. Absolutely. And one word is more than enough. :)

This blog copyright 2009 by jimgris