Ok, I'm at it again. Trying to figure out the best way to recognize contributors and participants within the OpenSolaris community. I feel like a lot of people out there are doing a lot of work but are not getting enough credit. This is not intentional, of course, but I think it should be addressed now that we are open. Besides, I want to explore this more deeply myself and see where it goes. I've been reading and talking to people and taking notes. I've also touched on the issue indirectly here and here (and I especially like Chris's comments), but I've never really directly brought it up with the OpenSolaris community on the discuss list. So we'll see what happens. If you feel like commenting, please feel to chime in. All are welcome.
Comments:

how about a special edition server, created specially for major contributors? Pimp the ride, and then have an event where you give the awards out. and more t-shirt marketing is always good. You could also commision a mini-book. The Open Solaris Primer, which would lay out some of the successes you have had, technically and in the community. Get it signed by all the leaders and so on.

Posted by james governor on January 06, 2006 at 09:29 PM JST #

Thanks, James. Excellent suggestions. I'll tell the guys. Several people have mentioned servers (a difficult one) but I love the mini book idea and the others. Sorry, I don't know what "pimp the ride" means. :)

Posted by Jim Grisanzio on January 07, 2006 at 02:59 AM JST #

Jim, how about giving them a @opensolaris.org email address? I know some people that treasure their @apache.org addy.

The other thing is that you want to remember to keep the rules to an absolute minimum. You want the Very Best hackers out there to work on the code. These people are traditionally staunch non-conformists and generally dislike doing anything they see as pointless. For example: if you had a rule that said: "no email address in the code" then the hacker will think: "They had to make a rule for that? Silly people."

Instead, encourage very strong collaboration.


For the non-coders, their name and email, and/or web address on the documents they work on. For example, if there is a web page on the sun website, have a contact. See http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/, at the bottom, in contact. The guy's name links to http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/, a page which has his email, and which he quite obviously authored himself.


Now, the w3 is not some fly-by-night group. Note the guy's email addy: "mimasa@w3.org" That's gotta have street cred. And the fact that his name appears on one of the principal pages for the HTML standard body for the Entire World has got to have some street cred too.

Also, in communications, use their full name. It really helps down the road when connecting the dots. If you say Matt worked on this function, it's not quite as effective as saying "Matthew Yardley wrote a function, it was great, Thanks Matt!!!"
It just seems a little bit more formal, a little bit more respectful, a bit less familiar, but I think in that sense formal is good too.

Posted by Christopher Mahan on January 07, 2006 at 12:14 PM JST #

Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.

This blog copyright 2009 by jimgris