Joe Hartley

Modern Towers of Babel.

Monday Feb 25, 2008

 
 

In the original Tower of Babel story, all the humans on earth spoke a single language and lived in a single place. They decided to build a structure that would reach into the heavens and implicitly show that humans were as powerful as God. Well, God had other plans. He invented a multitude of languages and scattered the people across the world. The Tower of Babel project was abandoned.

In the 21st century remake of this story, humans accidentally invented social network sites. Millions of people, primarily college-aged adults, join the communities. They start engaging in the communities in an attempt to build as large a “Friends” list as possible. Well, it's hard to interact with millions of people, so members create groups within these larger communities. (Facebook now hosts thousands of groups appealing to every interest conceivable, from Burritos in Oxford to Friends of the Sun Microsystems Foundation.) Sometimes they create separate communities altogether, such as LinkedIn (for professional networking). In fact, many people lose confidence in these new "Towers of Babel" and try to leave them, only to discover that leaving isn't as easy as joining.

Yet social networking as a technology is a powerful extension of the quintessential human strategy of banding together for a common interest. Think of the cavemen, who had to work as a team to take down the larger and more powerful wooly mammoths. How can organizations—be they corporate or academic—use this technology without losing the trust of their members? As Facebook and MySpace attempt to become a platform upon which others build their communities, what assurances do we need that our members won't be exploited beyond their willingness to be exploited? Should we instead build our own communities on stand-alone technology platforms where we can assure our members are protected?

Answering these questions is one of the key objects of our annual Worldwide Education & Research Conference this week in San Francisco . We've got an incredible array of speakers on the power and limits of communities. We're streaming the main presentations over the Web if you want to watch in real time (the link will be live on February 27), and we'll make them available asynchronously for later playback as well.

The first Tower of Babel didn't work out so well because of divine intervention. Perhaps these modern-day Towers can be effectively harnessed for productive use, but not without changing the fundamental compact that exists between a community and its members. Because unlike the real world, it's much easier to scatter on the Web if the Tower starts to crumble.

By the way, here's the original story from the Book of Genesis:

And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there. And they said one to another, Come, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar. And they said, Come, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children builded. And the Lord said, "If as one people speaking the same language they have begun to do this, then nothing they plan to do will be impossible for them." Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand  one another's speech. So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the Lord did there  confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the Lord scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth.

 (Image: The Tower of Babel by Pieter Brueghel the Elder (1563), courtesy of Wikipedia.)

[1] Comments
Like this post? del.icio.us | furl | slashdot | technorati | digg