Interviews, Updates, etc.
I got to speak with David Brancaccio a few days ago - whose public television show NOW is definitely worth watching. If you're a long time listener of the US's National Public Radio, you'll recognize David's voice. To me, he'll always be the voice of the bubble - the business journalist who reported on the economy as the stock market went through the roof in the late 90's. Just hearing him speak puts me in a (cautiously) good mood...
The interview aired last night. For those interested in my views on the business motivations behind bridging the digital divide (and Vinod Khosla's views on a potential remedy to the global oil crisis), you can watch or listen here.
While you're there, please take the time to visit this page.

Last week was full of real news, too - we broadened our flagship Java developer tool, NetBeans, to better support web developers with its simplified Visual Development Pack. And although it's not earth shattering, the rumors are true: we're now shipping a power meter with our Try and Buy Niagara systems - folks didn't believe the power savings (even with PG&E standing behind us), so we thought we'd simplify the analysis for potential customers.
The Postgres community also pushed a new version of their open source database out the door. I'm starting to see a major uptick in the commercial adoption of open source databases. Greenplum's a great example - a business intelligence/data warehousing solution based on Postgres, and general purpose infrastructure (Thumper and Solaris 10). See page 14 of this document for an interesting comparison of how those two products perform together against their peers.
I finally had a positive meeting with an investor related to our open source strategy (developers get it, investors have had a harder time). The key? I had the perfect picture with me - actually a mashup. Stay tuned, I'll show it here next week.
In the interim, I just saw this yesterday - great to see the OpenSolaris community making headlines (and congratulations, Anil!): (Click here if you can't see the video below.)
Finally, given the flood of emails my last post generated, along the lines of "did you read the comments about how hard it is to do business with Sun as a small company?" let me just say this: I and portions of my staff spent a good amount of time talking about those comments last week. And minimally, if you take a look at the new sun.com site, you'll see we are committed to improving the experience - for startups and titans, alike. We know we have work to do beyond the web site, and we will do so. (And to address one issue - given US export laws, and widely varying non-US commercial restrictions, there's unfortunately no way we can coordinate the availability of programs like Startup Essentials globally - we do try...)
So thank you for the comments. I do read them all.
Posted on 11:10PM Dec 09, 2006 | Comments[26]




















Posted by Switzerland on December 10, 2006 at 01:43 AM PST #
Posted by William R. Walling on December 10, 2006 at 08:53 AM PST #
Posted by Kevin Hutchinson on December 10, 2006 at 09:55 AM PST #
Posted by L. Ruday on December 10, 2006 at 03:48 PM PST #
Posted by Moinak Ghosh on December 10, 2006 at 10:36 PM PST #
I am back in time to Hong Kong for the ITU show
As Thumper could prove to be useful to one of the company's project, I looked for Sun Microsystem's booth for 30 minutes inside the exhibition centre.
End Result 1: I found it at the odd corner of the pretty dull tempo-office-looking maze (which I don't think is much of a problem since Intel and BEA are around as well).
End Result 2: I am blocked from even entering the door by a sufficient bulky chinese figure which keeps staring through me and does not even look as if he is interested in talking with me at all.
As for comparison, I had much better (enabled) experiences with all other booths, relevant businesses included. Am I supposed to stick a cheque on my forehead in order to start any conversations with any Sun representatives (in HK)?
Posted by Alex Lam on December 11, 2006 at 12:34 AM PST #
Posted by evanx on December 11, 2006 at 12:59 AM PST #
Posted by HC on December 11, 2006 at 07:36 AM PST #
Posted by mj on December 11, 2006 at 08:35 AM PST #
Posted by Ravi Boddapati on December 11, 2006 at 09:19 AM PST #
Posted by SomeJavaEEguy on December 11, 2006 at 09:32 AM PST #
Posted by Bill on December 11, 2006 at 12:49 PM PST #
Posted by Bill Walker on December 11, 2006 at 02:55 PM PST #
Posted by Thanh Doan on December 11, 2006 at 11:41 PM PST #
Posted by Partha on December 12, 2006 at 04:12 AM PST #
Posted by Todd on December 12, 2006 at 10:22 AM PST #
Posted by Arjun Rathore on December 12, 2006 at 01:54 PM PST #
Posted by dean on December 12, 2006 at 03:44 PM PST #
Posted by just curious on December 13, 2006 at 07:22 AM PST #
Posted by Andrew on December 13, 2006 at 08:12 AM PST #
Posted by Kemp Watson on December 13, 2006 at 11:26 AM PST #
Posted by Scott Feamster on December 13, 2006 at 07:28 PM PST #
Feedback about Thumper.
Its great for I/O throughput but how about designing for a bit more CPU (4-8 sockets i.e 2218/8218)? If you use it for a database, you should be able to use more RAM. So 8-16 GB addressable RAM per socket would then make real good sense, giving a total of 32-128 GB RAM.
A Opteron database server with 32GB+ RAM and huge number of spindles takes care of everything: CPU, I/O, and memory caching. Just putting memcached in front and you could drive a lot of things with just One General Purpose Machine.
Posted by Amit Kulkarni on December 13, 2006 at 09:50 PM PST #
Posted by AC on December 13, 2006 at 09:53 PM PST #
Posted by Steve on December 14, 2006 at 09:59 PM PST #
Posted by mick on December 15, 2006 at 08:00 AM PST #