My Family Photos - and ODF
I was staying with my parents a few years ago, and looking through a shoe box of old family photos. It was great, I was really enjoying them - until it occurred to me most of the photos were singletons. That is, they were the only copies. On earth. And of at least one individual from my family's past, there were only two or three photographs in existence. Yipes.
A shoe box, I thought. How archaic, right? What if there were a flood, or heaven forbid, a fire? These are photographs I want to share with my family, and to pass along for generations. I want my children to know their history. And their children and their children.
So I did what any good son would do, I convinced my parents to let me abscond with the box, I returned home, and I scanned the photos (and returned the box).
And then the scanned photos were sitting on my hard drive. On my laptop. In my kitchen (that's where my laptop lives).
Given what daily happens in my kitchen, that was probably less safe than a shoebox. So much for archaic. Strike one.
So I made a few DVD's. And distributed them around my house, and gave some to other family members. Suffice it to say, most non-professional system administrators are non-professional for a reason - most of the DVD's were lost. Strike two.
But good news, someone bright once said the network is the computer - I decided a while back to upload them to my on-line photo service. If you're going to watch a shoe box, you may as well hire someone who's watching other people's shoe boxes, and may in fact be the best in the world at such a task.
And then I thought...
How do I guarantee the service will be around, or that I'll be able to render the images I've stored there - not just in a year, but in five or fifty? What if the images outlive the technology?
And with that as a backdrop, now you understand at least one real world motivation behind something called the Open Document Format.
Imagine you're a legislator that writes a law, or a doctor that drafts a patient's record, or a student that writes a novel. And that five years or fifty years from now, you want to return to review your documents. Except the vendor that created the application used to draft those documents, the company that created the word processor, has either gone out of business, or decided to charge you $10,000 for a version capable of reading old file formats. Either scenario makes the point: Information always outlives technology.
What do you do?
First, you grumble. After all, the information you created is your information - not the vendor's. Just like your family photos, the last thing you'd want is a camera company demanding payment before you could see your photos. And that's the danger created by applications without open file formats. Remember, information outlives technology.
That's why we, alongside some of the industry's most important technology companies, and a bevy of governments and agencies around the world, created something called the Open Document Format (known affectionately as 'ODF'). ODF defines an open format for document based information that's independent of the applications used to create documents stored in ODF.
Which is a fancy way of saying if you write a law or a medical history or a regulatory filing in a word processor that supports ODF today, and need to gain access to it at any point in the future, you'll have the freedom to do so on your terms. Without being held up by an application provider. ODF is a true open standard, adopted and implemented by a diversity of vendors (from IBM and Sun, to Google, Red Hat and now even Microsoft), and embraced by an amazing spectrum of the planet. And it's royalty free.
Durability of information and file formats is exceptionally important to institutions or businesses with document retention policies that extend beyond the useful life of the software (and employees) creating the documents - and ensures the availability of information well into the future. The same applies to the photographs in the shoebox - as the CIO of my home, I want the images to outlive me.
And just in case you missed the menu item, we're working with Google to ensure interoperability between Google's office documents and OpenOffice documents - leveraging ODF as an exchange mechanism. Any document created in Google's office can be trivially exported to (and soon imported from) OpenOffice (see the screenshot). Together, the two products allow businesses and individuals to preserve access, across the globe and across generations, for laws, legal contracts, patient records, diaries and strategic plans. Along with spreadsheets and presentations.
Finally, for those new to OpenOffice, it's a free office productivity suite that will forever be free - to corporations and end users alike. As best we can count, we've distributed hundreds of millions of copies across the world (download here). And now that Microsoft has announced support for the Open Document Format, users can feel comfortable that OpenOffice can be added to any environment, home or office, not just across the developing world, but the developed. In a few weeks, you'll be able to download an ODF plug-in here, which will enable Microsoft Word, by default, to save to/read from ODF. Once installed, you'll see this in Word's Options panel:
(I'll provide a pointer when the plug-in is ready.)
From then on, ODF becomes your default format. Whether you're an oil company or a high school student - ODF will enable seamless interoperability between open source and closed source environments - for as long as the standard, not the technology or product, exists.
From a corporate perspective, this also allows a very natural migration to occur across large institutions - front office staff might stay on Microsoft Word, but the rest of the organization can move to an interoperable alternative (say, Google's word processor or OpenOffice - or both). Affordability and interoperability are a good thing for the internet - and for the successive generations we expect to use it.
Posted on 09:54PM Feb 12, 2007 | Comments[35]

























Posted by AL on February 12, 2007 at 10:29 PM PST #
Posted by Dave Pawson on February 13, 2007 at 12:37 AM PST #
Posted by Krish on February 13, 2007 at 01:19 AM PST #
Posted by Alex on February 13, 2007 at 01:28 AM PST #
Posted by Jonathan David on February 13, 2007 at 01:49 AM PST #
Posted by Peter Firmstone on February 13, 2007 at 03:20 AM PST #
Posted by Petri T. Koistinen on February 13, 2007 at 03:56 AM PST #
Posted by Anantha on February 13, 2007 at 05:21 AM PST #
Posted by Fionn on February 13, 2007 at 05:26 AM PST #
One day, when the only thing that you don't have free and open control over is your desktop operating system, it'll become obvious that it's time to knock over that last big obstacle.
Posted by ig on February 13, 2007 at 06:34 AM PST #
Posted by Jeff 'SKI' Kinsey on February 13, 2007 at 07:22 AM PST #
Posted by Lior on February 13, 2007 at 07:59 AM PST #
Posted by Paul Kasper on February 13, 2007 at 08:07 AM PST #
Jonathan, when talking with colleagues about ODF, there's a perception that the format is done solely by Sun Microsystems. Not true as we know. But it's something for your marketeers to make more obvious to the uneducated masses.
"OpenDocument or ODF, short for the OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications" is maintained by the ODF Alliance @ http://www.odfalliance.org
Sun is monetizing by selling StarOffice, the commercial version of OpenOffice.org. As a shareholder and end user, I'm very glad to see Sun continue their efforts there. (Obviously, that software doesn't generate revenue akin to Sun's hardware sales, but it's still highly relevant to your overall business strategies.) I love that Sun is leading the pack among M$ Office competitors, including Corel and IBM whom are now adopting ODF in their own products. That is impressive. Sun is a leader... not a follower. And that will continue to transform Sun into $un. :-)
The fact that Sun is backing numerous open standards and has more open source code in the public domain than any other company in history is impressive and appreciated*. Thank you Jonathan (and Sun)! With an emerging global market, NOW is the time to break closed formats and continue innovation (via open source/open formats) with the end users/developers/communities. ODF has been long overdue. (IMHO, I believe it's better than M$'s OpenXML format. See Office Open XML Fact Sheet via the ODF Alliance site. ODF and OpenXML does beg a Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD comparison, tho.)
*Yeah, I'm passionate about this.
Posted by Justy on February 13, 2007 at 10:58 AM PST #
Posted by Gil on February 13, 2007 at 11:26 AM PST #
Can one be willing to have such documents stored with a third party ?
Just being curious ;-)
Posted by Sean on February 13, 2007 at 02:14 PM PST #
Bell states: "The most serious impediment to a lasting archive is the evolution of media, platforms, formats, and the applications that create them. Unique, proprietary, and constantly evolving data formats such as Acrobat-4, MPEG-4, Oracle 8, Quicken 2001, Real G2, and Word 2000 suggest or even guarantee obsolescence."
Open formats are definitely a way to guard against data being orphaned with age.
PS: The plug-in sounds like a great idea
Posted by Savio Rodrigues on February 13, 2007 at 02:47 PM PST #
Posted by Tom on February 13, 2007 at 05:13 PM PST #
Posted by Tom on February 13, 2007 at 05:14 PM PST #
Posted by m nassal on February 13, 2007 at 06:07 PM PST #
Posted by Jon Arbuckle on February 13, 2007 at 10:00 PM PST #
Posted by Anonymous User on February 14, 2007 at 03:42 AM PST #
Posted by Blake Landau on February 14, 2007 at 02:50 PM PST #
Posted by Casey Farrell on February 14, 2007 at 08:59 PM PST #
Posted by Simon on February 15, 2007 at 01:17 AM PST #
Posted by Mark Begemann on February 15, 2007 at 10:08 AM PST #
Posted by Jonathan Gershater on February 15, 2007 at 12:32 PM PST #
Posted by Kevin Hutchinson on February 15, 2007 at 07:52 PM PST #
I disagree Kevin - Sun will make cash from ODF when it becomes the standard and Sun becomes the first place everyone looks to for custom implementation work and consultancy.
Did you complain when Sun gave Java away for free? What about the millions Sun now makes from developing JRE's for mobile phones, mobile devices, and all the other high-margin work Java brings in?
If Sun hadn't given Java away, the mass-market for it would never have formed, so Java wouldn't be making the money it is today.
This is long-term thinking - a dollar tomorrow, rather than a cent today.
Posted by Gareth Randall on February 16, 2007 at 02:06 AM PST #
Posted by Mihai on February 16, 2007 at 08:06 AM PST #
I have two questions in addition to a comment.
First the comment: I think Sun's commitment to open standards for data types, and recognition of the document as the fundamental data type of business, is admirable.
Now for the questions:
1) If Sun is so commited to open standards, why does Jonathan post company video to a site where sharing (and especially embedding, but also downloading) that video in other locations on the internet is impossible? and
2) Does Sun at least recognize audio and video as datatypes that are driving a significant evolution of applications for ICT?
Posted by Stephen Smith on February 16, 2007 at 10:00 AM PST #
Sun StorageTek has a big hole in its offerings, no product which goes head to head against RamSan's SSD offerings. Wouldn't some customers like to store some of their hot files in battery backed RAM or go completely flash with BitMicro's offerings?
Posted by Amit Kulkarni on February 16, 2007 at 10:48 AM PST #
Posted by Mike Fedyk on February 16, 2007 at 05:08 PM PST #
Posted by Kevin Hutchinson on February 16, 2007 at 05:59 PM PST #
Posted by Isriya Paireepairit on February 17, 2007 at 07:29 AM PST #