Will We Make a Dent?
From a few weeks ago, my interview with Pat Mitchell on the convergence of traditional and new media is below (with a spirited but well meaning exchange with the general counsel of Viacom toward the end):
And for one of the most compelling perspectives I've heard on how technology is changing the developing world, try listening to Allen Hammond's response to David Kirkpatrick's question (about 4:50 in), "Will [technology] make a significant dent on global poverty by the year 2027?"
Posted on 08:52AM Jul 11, 2007 | Comments[22]



















Posted by Chris Melissinos on July 11, 2007 at 10:22 AM PDT #
Posted by Ed Gordon on July 11, 2007 at 10:26 AM PDT #
Posted by Musings from the Peanut Gallery on July 11, 2007 at 11:53 AM PDT #
Posted by Paul Diamond on July 11, 2007 at 12:33 PM PDT #
Posted by Gumby on July 11, 2007 at 01:10 PM PDT #
Posted by Virtual Steve on July 11, 2007 at 09:14 PM PDT #
Posted by Tobias on July 12, 2007 at 01:27 AM PDT #
Posted by Mike Mastrilli on July 12, 2007 at 03:02 AM PDT #
Posted by stateofVA on July 12, 2007 at 04:41 AM PDT #
Posted by Chris Melissinos on July 12, 2007 at 10:52 AM PDT #
I look forward to your thoughts on this blog and even though I may not agree with all you have to say I think your thoughts and vision are genuine and not just a way to generate buzz and more eyeballs for Sun. Not that there is anything wrong with marketing but if the intentions are perceived to be disingenuous or calculated that can be more disaffecting not less.
On a final note I thought that there was good, frank exchange between you and your potential customers (I think 'spirited' is how you may have put it). Prannoy Roy for instance is one of the pioneers of modern news reporting in India and has helped introduce transparency into the election process and set new standards in open political debate and dialog there. His question may not have been directed at the right audience but I hope that the exchange was taken in the right spirit and may be the beginning of a fruitful relationship for Sun.
Posted by smathew on July 12, 2007 at 12:18 PM PDT #
Posted by Ashlee Vance on July 12, 2007 at 05:34 PM PDT #
Posted by Rafael Vanoni on July 12, 2007 at 10:18 PM PDT #
Posted by Edward on July 12, 2007 at 11:58 PM PDT #
Posted by Chris Melissinos on July 13, 2007 at 10:51 AM PDT #
Posted by Edward O'Callaghan on July 14, 2007 at 10:37 AM PDT #
I think your OpenSPARC venture is great. So far, I do not think that any South Asian (from where i am) company has actually used these specs and stuff to produce a full PC/workstation. Clearly, you are once again doing the right thing, but without good marketing. SUN is reinventing itself, seeing clearly that as you say, there is great value in volume. So, when are you announcing the next SUN-[SouthAsiaFabCorp] venture which helps make PCs without the "well-designed" crap that other market loaders(sic) produce?
The problem so far was that the popular OS ran only on the popular hardware. Popular has now become very unpopular and will continue to do so. With GNU/Linux and (Open)Solaris, PPC and Sparc *exist* as options.
The important thing is (examples only, for the sake of illustration ):
$1,000,000 x 100 = $100,000,000 // present, big corp, N.America
$1,000,000 x 100 = $100,000,000 // future, big corp - S.Asia - not stuck in PER*, first time buyer, booming economy
plus
$10,000 x 10,000 = $100,000,000 // future, small corp, S.Asia - not stuck in PER*, first time buyer, booming economy
plus
$1,000 x 100,000 = $100,000,000 // workstations for software dev. - PER*-tortured/harassed, happy to switch
plus
$200 (upto $500) x [see encyclopedia] = $[very big number] // PCs, laptops, smartphones, cameras, gadget-mashups
*PER: I deal directly and daily with the channel here. They hate direct retailers because they see no future for their business if they cannot earn from fixing broken hardware. Any correlation between quality of "popular products" and this?(sic) Which points to a massive, endemic, "perennial extortion racket"(PER).
The numbers are possibly more if South Asians are allowed to earn some more income and allowed some more spending power. You know all those far better than I can elucidate here. South Asia has the numbers. Real big numbers.
A certain famous(sic) dropout realised that much before everyone else.
But these PER pawns aren't monopolists. They have been puppets of the monopolist masters. They can't bite. No teeth. Show them decent cash and they'll switch. Everyone will switch. So, if you work with the channel, your UltraSPARC + h/w kit is new. Which means learning, training, support. All that means daily business and income to the channel. And to FLOSS startups. But everyone should work for it, unlike license sales and commissions which are no-brainers. So, you need to give them training, this, that........ Keep it cheap and they'll all switch.
IMO, the only big danger, which needs to be stated for completeness, is that doing too much of this will make *you* like them. Subject to SUN having that integrity over the next decade, you stand to win or lose in the game of numbers.
To circumvent that danger - a monopolistic SUN Microsystems(!) - a simple solution to that is allow opensource support to grow - GNU/Solaris would be the best. SUN hardware can play a huge part. Most likely, you won't get a local fab company here to trouble your chip market share. But, of course, I can't say a thing about global players. Just make the chips available cheaply. The rest should take care of itself. Or you could.
And Java is not about only desktop/application programming - Jini. Post-opensource, licensing is not a source of revenue. Post-internet, basic services get you little.
The idea is to avoid anyone, including you, from getting into the easy-money PER habit - that's why it is called *earning* an income. Make good money, by all means, travel in limousines, no problem, but let us at least travel in buses and trains.
So, we all have a *huge* task ahead. But, it is better than the PER. To be able to trust the success of all these rosy thoughts, we (and i) need to have OpenSolaris GPLed, v3. OR at least 'v2 or *at your option* any later version'.
v3 obviously, isn't it? Take your time, but do it. It will really be good for everyone.
And let us here, make hey!!! while the SUN shines.
-A
Posted by arvind on July 15, 2007 at 05:32 AM PDT #
Posted by Carolyn A. Colborn on July 15, 2007 at 08:46 AM PDT #
Posted by hajma on July 15, 2007 at 02:27 PM PDT #
Posted by Ashlee Vance on July 16, 2007 at 11:31 AM PDT #
Posted by Thorbiörn Fritzon on July 16, 2007 at 06:49 PM PDT #
Posted by Chris Melissinos on July 18, 2007 at 07:41 AM PDT #