I Don't Believe in Walled Gardens
For those interested in Sun's organization charts (which are, in effect, an expression of my priorities), what's below is the message I sent to all of Sun earlier today. Keeping everyone up to speed on where we're headed is a big part of my job (I'd argue, one of my biggest) - so if you're interested in such things, read on. (And yes, I thought about simply posting this on my blog this morning - but I didn't want folks inside Sun finding out about an organizational change via an external source - thus, the courtesy of an internal email first.)
______________________________________
To: All of Sun
From: Jonathan Schwartz
Subject: Announcing a new business, and a new leader (or two)
I announced a few organizational changes this morning, and I want to be sure everyone hears directly from me about my motivations and expectations.
As you know, we've opened a world of opportunity by ensuring Solaris is available on Dell, HP and IBM hardware. We can now talk to what were traditionally non-Sun customers. Similarly, our moves to build an x64 systems business, and bring Linux to the SPARC platform, have made us relevant to non-Solaris customers. As of today, I'm seeking to repeat that effect with our Microelectronics, or silicon investments. I'd like to see our chip business grow beyond Sun's own systems, and more broadly in the marketplace.
So I've formed a Microelectronics group, which will be led by Dr. David Yen (yes, that David Yen). David and team will focus on building Sun's Microelectronics business - embedded within, and beyond, Sun's systems.
Why now?
Because we have innovations (in platforms like Niagara, Rock and our Neptune project) that companies beyond Sun are interested in embedding in their devices. And I want to have a focused, independent team driving those opportunities and monetizing Sun's innovation - from networking and cryptography, to the future of power management and high performance computing. Our Niagara platforms, on their way to delivering their first billion dollars to Sun, prove silicon investments deliver competetive advantage. This change puts more fuel in that engine.
What happens to the Storage business? Two things.
First, I'm elevating Jon Benson to my staff to run our Storage group. He'll be responsible for all products and solutions purpose built for the Storage marketplace. These include our SAN, Tape, Archive and OEM products and partnerships. Having worked alongside Jon for the past year, I have every faith he's got the energy and innovative insights to bring new value to all of Sun. So congratulations, Jon, and welcome to the Executive Leadership Team.
Now, looking to products like Thumper (aka, the x4500) and Solaris/ZFS, it's clear the rise of general purpose systems running open source software open a new opportunity in the network attached storage (or NAS) market. NAS vendors who aren't joined up with a Systems (read, Server) company are finding it difficult to differentiate in hardware - via power efficiency, systems management or packaging. Still other storage vendors, unable to leverage a volume open source operating system, are feeling the strain of using proprietary OS's - which can't attract developer communities.
So with this shift, I'm also transferring ownership and resources for our NAS hardware offerings to the Systems group. I expect the teams to collaborate, and compete based on different approaches. And I expect us to have the kinds of insights the market wants, as customers use our offerings and innovation to manage their own information lifecycle.
Although transferring the NAS hardware team to Systems is a very small move in terms of people, it's a substantive one strategically, which I wanted to highlight. We're doubling our focus on storage - by broadening the teams with a stake in our Storage success.
We continue to see our customers's storage environments as loosely coupled, but highly aligned - those within a bank responsible for archiving teller surveillance videos have little in common with those running real-time trading systems. But they both buy and manage storage, they both worry about security and economics, and they both expect value from Sun. In recognizing the distinction and synergies, in every industry we serve, we're hoping to build an even stronger world class storage business.
So in summary - I'm creating a new Microelectronics Group, headed by David Yen. I'm elevating Jon Benson to lead our Storage Group. And I'm asking John Fowler and the Systems team to drive our NAS roadmap, leveraging Solaris and our Systems expertise.
With that, here are some of my favorite internal questions:
When is this effective?
Immediately. There are still some small organizational issues to be resolved, but the substantive transitions are effective immediately - and we're talking to new Microelectronics opportunities as I type this! Stay tuned for "interesting news."
Does this mean you're setting these businesses up to spin them out?
No, we're not setting them up to spin them out. Let me say that again, just in case you're asked - or a competitor suggests as much to our customers. No, we're not setting them up to spin them out. We're setting them up to focus their energy and attention.
By combining NAS Storage with your Systems team, aren't you defocusing them?
No, we're actually focusing them. Do customers want storage blades? NAS platforms built and managed via a common operating system and provisioning environment? A virtualization approach that spans data and apps (and the network)? The answer's yes to all the questions - and we're uniquely positioned to deliver all the answers.
Does this imply the decline of Tape or SAN storage? The dominance of NAS?
Quite the opposite - growth in storage won't decline for as long as we're on this earth. Our ability to innovate across primary and secondary storage, across SANs and NAS (and DAS), positions us to grow, not shrink. We run businesses to grow them.
Will there be any changes in Sun's field organization - in Sales, Service or Support?
Nope. Changing how we build something has no bearing on how customers buy it.
I want everyone to know I take reorgs very seriously - I know they absorb time and energy, and run the risk of defocusing teams. I also know they're necessary if we want to lead the market, vs. follow it. Now's the time to lead, in Microelectronics, Systems, Storage, Software and Services.
In closing, there's one message I'd like to convey to those involved in this shift: we are a business driven by innovation, and our ability to deliver it faster than the competition. A time to market advantage is among our most important - please work with your managers and their management to ensure we stay focused on the deliverables at hand. Your peers, our shareholders, and our customers depend upon it. Pace matters.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Posted on 10:21PM Mar 27, 2007 | Comments[30]

























Posted by Pat Patterson on March 27, 2007 at 11:39 PM PDT #
Posted by Mike Riversdale on March 28, 2007 at 12:45 AM PDT #
Posted by Nicholas Lee on March 28, 2007 at 01:04 AM PDT #
Posted by Ewen Chan on March 28, 2007 at 03:39 AM PDT #
Posted by James McPherson on March 28, 2007 at 06:11 AM PDT #
Posted by D Lewis on March 28, 2007 at 07:11 AM PDT #
Posted by Anantha on March 28, 2007 at 10:32 AM PDT #
Posted by gil on March 28, 2007 at 10:50 AM PDT #
Posted by Steven Loi on March 28, 2007 at 11:43 AM PDT #
Posted by WhatNeedsToBeDone on March 28, 2007 at 03:33 PM PDT #
Posted by SKI on March 28, 2007 at 04:44 PM PDT #
Posted by Anonymous on March 29, 2007 at 08:08 AM PDT #
Posted by William R. Walling on March 29, 2007 at 09:55 AM PDT #
It's really pleasure to see how Sun as a company and You as CEO are open in communications with customers, partners, the market. Announced hardware moves are logical on the current stage of business development and you are on time with making that. Congratulations!
At the same time Sun's software business seems being in the crisis and on the dangerous intersection.
The first direction - it could be transformed just to appendix for the hardware business as a most probable scenarious, unfortunately. Why unfortunately? Because it's about loss of business. On the Analysts Summit it was pushed a statement of monetizing software. But where is the major release of JCAPS? Why you invest into the open source competitors for your commercial products like Open ESB? And there are a lots of questions in the set...
The second way is to build the real business around software. It's just about focus on business value instead of the technical evangelism, and execution of course.
Being "just" hardware company in the times of solutions and platforms is not for Sun as The Innovation Company. Hope to see next big move for the software practice as well.
You are the best-of-breed CEO with a strong Vision and unique Team. Please, listen to market and be first as many times before. Don't forget that software as a platform is a brilliant piece in the corona of Sun. And SW could be a key for SunW for the long shining on the market.
Sincerely yours,"Software Guy"
[Within my 15+ years in IT I haven't been and I'm not Sun's employee or partner, but like to see what Sun is doing for innovations.]
Posted by Software Guy on March 29, 2007 at 12:49 PM PDT #
Posted by Jimbo on March 29, 2007 at 08:31 PM PDT #
Posted by NN on March 30, 2007 at 12:36 AM PDT #
In response to Jimbo - very salient point, and a good part of the reason that neither my current company nor last one will touch Java. It appears that only _some_ of Sun is on the 64-bit track. Note that the bug report seems to indicate that the issue will be addressed soon, though.
More topically, I've seen a number of posts here, supported to some extent by Jonathan's email today, that Sun should get into 'this' or 'that' to cover more ground. As with the issue above, and my previous comments re the (incredible) disconnect between the ZFS filesystem and Sun's storage offerings, I think Sun really should consider pausing to get its ducks in a row before tackling any more opportunities. The company is making superb progress in some areas, but the rest doesn't seem to be pulling along. My guess is internal politics and inertia. Somebody ought to get nasty and trim some fat... :~
Posted by Kemp Watson on March 30, 2007 at 06:33 AM PDT #
Posted by Anonymous on March 30, 2007 at 09:11 AM PDT #
Posted by Prince on March 30, 2007 at 02:29 PM PDT #
another great blog post. and a perfect example of being transparent in the way this article (in which you are referenced) describes:
The See-Through CEO
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/wired40_ceo_pr.html
Posted by David M. Besonen on March 31, 2007 at 01:15 PM PDT #
Posted by thomas laviano on March 31, 2007 at 07:29 PM PDT #
Posted by osproponent on April 01, 2007 at 10:14 PM PDT #
Posted by Paul O'Kelly on April 02, 2007 at 01:33 AM PDT #
Only those who have studied a companies customers, culture and workings, analysed its problems and understood whats really going on can iniate long term positive change. There are many of us who cannot gauge the outcome of your decisions yet. Some will criticise based on their observations of other turnarounds. Some will criticise based on a fear of change, some will just criticise.
It's easy to criticise, much harder to do, but you know your doing something right when people are happy working with you.
There are three types of people in this world:
So from where I'm standing, it looks like your making it happen.
Posted by Peter on April 02, 2007 at 11:00 PM PDT #
Posted by Hussein Dharsi on April 03, 2007 at 07:18 AM PDT #
Posted by An Old Friend on April 03, 2007 at 01:12 PM PDT #
Posted by Mark on April 03, 2007 at 09:48 PM PDT #
Posted by Happy Tobuy on April 04, 2007 at 05:24 PM PDT #
Posted by Happy Tobuy on April 04, 2007 at 10:15 PM PDT #
Since OpenBSD can manipulate data in a Sparc processor, is it not too much to ask to get the data from the processor out across the host adaptors/PCI interfaces to the network/storage?
Hear: http://www.fetissov.org/public/nycbsdcon06/2.1.mp3
See: http://www.thought.net/jason/sparc64-nycbsdcon06/
Sun's sales could be increased by opening up chipset docs to permit the world's most secure OS (OpenBSD) to be deployed reliably in more data centres. In roles such as load balancing, packet filtering, DNS serving, spam rejection, mail processing, web serving,..... Services that tend to be risky due to the fact that they are facing the hostile Internet. Exactly the sort of environment that OpenBSD is designed for.
Some additional relevant links are:
...schizo(4), the host bridge, appears to be fairly buggy as evidenced by the Linux/OpenSolaris workarounds. Unlike Linux and Solaris, the only documentation or errata we have for these chips is the Linux/OpenSolaris source code. This is NOT documentation and has slowed progress. We tried getting documentation from Sun; might as well have been yelling at a wall, so we do the best with what we have.
Docs reqd incl:
Under previous generations of Sun management, an overtly hostile relationship was generated by Sun. As Jonathan stated: "For years we were called proprietary - a moniker that did more damage to Sun than any market downturn"
Thus: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=113398111624138&w=2
Compare: http://www.openbsd.org/sparc64.html
History: "....Sun refused access to the necessary documentation for the (very bizzare) host bridge in the UltraSPARC III machines, so a few years were lost before some reverse engineering figured out the changes in these machines. OpenBSD 4.0 is thus the first release to ship with support for the UltraSPARC III based machines."
In an exchange of private emails, a senior OpenBSD developer wrote:
Jonathan and David, the ball is in your court. The community is calling on Sun to stand up like men and become more open. The alternative is to behave like other companies that continue to cower, emasculated, behind legal teams.
Posted by Craig Skinner on April 05, 2007 at 04:05 AM PDT #