Monday November 20, 2006
|
| iTunes vs Musicmatch Jukebox | Computers |

A while back I blogged about incompatibilities between iTunes and Yahoo's Musicmatch Jukebox. That issue is still unresolved, but there were some comments about which interface is better. In the spirit of fair play, I decided to give iTunes a try. Note that I an not comparing the online music stores, just the players.
Summary: iTunes has more player options, but Musicmatch is a better ripper and organizer. Musicmatch still wins, in my opinion.
Many features are available with both players and comparing those features is not really valuable, so I'll try to just focus on the differences. I'm not claiming to be an expert with either program so if you know how to do something that I don't, let me know.
iTunes Pros:
- Lots of statistics. iTunes keeps track of how often songs are played and can use that information to generate a playlist. It's also easier to add your own personal ratings with iTunes since you can also do so via your iPod.
- Better "between song" features. iTunes realizes that some songs need to be played right after other songs with no gaps. It also has the cross fader feature that blends songs together like a DJ.
- "Endless" random play. iTunes' "Party Shuffle" is slightly better the MM's "auto DJ" since it's open ended. MM requires that you enter a total time and then generates a fixed playlist.
- iTunes' search is better and faster. MM is a little clunky.
iTunes Cons:
- Doesn't play all mp3 files well! This surprised me. I have some older mp3s, ripped in the old days, and when iTunes plays them there is digital static for the first few seconds. It's very annoying.
Musicmatch Pros:
- Tagging and super tagging. Musicmatch absolutely blows away iTunes in this area.
iTunes only allows you to edit one song at a time. iTunes can edit more than file at a time, but in a very limited fashion [see comments]. Musicmatch can edit multiple songs at one time, use one song to tag other songs, tag files based on the filename, and even rename the files based on the tags. But the best feature is access to the online database of tags, and album art, that allow you to tag an entire album based on some search criteria. - Mini player is better. It's more mini.
- Fast ripping. Very fast.
Musicmatch Cons:
- Can't update my iPod. 'nuff said.
It seems to me that iTunes is really geared towards Apple's iTunes store and playing music that has already been tagged and downloaded. Musicmatch, while it also has a large online music store (Yahoo Music now), was written for the old school crowd (like me), who rip their own CDs and like to manage the meta data themselves.
For me, may of iTunes' "pros" aren't as important to me, so I'd like to stick with Musicmatch. Now only if someone would fix this incompatibility problem.
Tags: itunes, music, musicmatch, apple, yahoo
Tags: apple itunes music musicmatch yahoo
November 20, 2006 09:51 AM PST Permalink | Comments [11] |
Posted by Pete on November 20, 2006 at 01:03 PM PST #
Posted by VHF on November 20, 2006 at 02:45 PM PST #
Posted by Brian Utterback on November 21, 2006 at 09:58 AM PST #
Thanks for the info. I tried that but it only "sort of" worked. Yes, it allowed me to select multiple songs and then displayed the editing window. However, not all of the fields were filled in using the data from the songs. There was also no way of selecting one song from the list to use as a "master".
Point: Still Musicmatch
Posted by Sunqueen on March 06, 2007 at 09:56 PM PST #
Posted by Chris Guarente on March 25, 2007 at 06:28 AM PDT #
Posted by Steve M on April 08, 2007 at 03:52 PM PDT #
Posted by Michael Dahnke on July 08, 2007 at 12:46 PM PDT #
Im looking for a Jukebox now that we lost Musicmatch( I didnt like yahoo Jukebox) Any recomendations??
Posted by Beto on September 20, 2007 at 10:05 PM PDT #
I'm very late in this but totally agree with the criticism of yahoo. It will not play my WAV files ripped in Musicmatch. It will record in wav format and won't play the song. It is totally unstable. an omega version at the moment.
"They" are progressively dismantling Musicmatch services.
I still use it to rip songs but they now come in labelled track 1,2 etc. I then edit the track, put in album and singer info. I then do a lookup and select from the range of suggested titles. It works most times. Last week it used to pull up the album art but its stopped doing that. It reminds me of "mad max' or 'Waterworld"; it's decaying. The bad thing is that I can't find another ripper that does it the same way as muma and recognises the format of the songs I've already ripped.
Posted by dave on November 13, 2007 at 02:34 AM PST #
My fiancee & I joined MusicMatch this morning, April 28, 2008. It took his credit card & charged him 50 some dollars for MusicMatch. There was nowhere else to go from there, so we X'd out & figured the icon would appear on his screen after that. Well, NOTHING! Nothing in his e-mail about it, NOTHING! I call Yahoo support music center, at:1-800-318-0631 & the guy tells me that there is no longer a MusicMatch. Why in the hell are they still advertising it & stealing people's money? Shouldn't there be something we can do about this? Renee in Cumberland, Maryland
Posted by Renee on April 29, 2008 at 12:03 PM PDT #
Comments are closed for this entry.
©
Kevin Chu, Some Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Sun Microsystems Trademarks are in effect.
All opinons are mine! Mine! Mine! Mine! Sun Microsystems has nothing to do with them.
